Conceptualizing the public good for genomics in the global South: a cross-disciplinary roundtable dialogue

Since the Human Genome Project, initiatives to genetically sequence and profile populations around the world have expanded rapidly. The rationales guiding this expansion are diverse: on the one hand, the concentration of genetic technologies in the global North threatens to widen the yawning gaps in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tayyaba Jiwani, Adjua Akinwumi, Jocelyn Cheé-Santiago, Yulia Egorova, Gabriel Frassetto, Ricardo di Lazzaro Filho, Iscia Lopes-Cendes, Mercedes Okumura, José Antonio Alonso Pavón, Alice B. Popejoy, David Skinner, Peter Wade, Matthias Wienroth, Ernesto Schwartz-Marin, Michel Satya Naslavsky
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Genetics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2025.1523396/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849428550076071936
author Tayyaba Jiwani
Adjua Akinwumi
Jocelyn Cheé-Santiago
Yulia Egorova
Gabriel Frassetto
Ricardo di Lazzaro Filho
Iscia Lopes-Cendes
Mercedes Okumura
José Antonio Alonso Pavón
Alice B. Popejoy
David Skinner
Peter Wade
Matthias Wienroth
Ernesto Schwartz-Marin
Michel Satya Naslavsky
Michel Satya Naslavsky
author_facet Tayyaba Jiwani
Adjua Akinwumi
Jocelyn Cheé-Santiago
Yulia Egorova
Gabriel Frassetto
Ricardo di Lazzaro Filho
Iscia Lopes-Cendes
Mercedes Okumura
José Antonio Alonso Pavón
Alice B. Popejoy
David Skinner
Peter Wade
Matthias Wienroth
Ernesto Schwartz-Marin
Michel Satya Naslavsky
Michel Satya Naslavsky
author_sort Tayyaba Jiwani
collection DOAJ
description Since the Human Genome Project, initiatives to genetically sequence and profile populations around the world have expanded rapidly. The rationales guiding this expansion are diverse: on the one hand, the concentration of genetic technologies in the global North threatens to widen the yawning gaps in healthcare available in advanced versus developing nations. On the other, more ‘genetic diversity’ in global databases can reveal new points of genetic variation associated with health or disease. This promises to pave the way to a more personalized medicine of the future—more powerful and prosperous, with tailored prevention regimens and genetic treatments targeted to every individual’s specific genetic vulnerabilities. These rationales are advanced to claim a public good case for genomics. However, the expansion of genomics to underserved populations in the global South has provoked many sociopolitical and ethical challenges. Critics have pointed to the inevitable entanglement of genomics with private commercial interests. These concerns are overlaid on deeper anxieties stemming from global asymmetries in scientific and technological power, and historical patterns of value extraction from colonized and marginalized populations. How then do we disentangle the public good? How do we build a genomics science that is just and equitable for the vast majority of the world? This conversation convenes leading genomics practitioners and critical science studies scholars to address these questions. We draw on an ongoing transdisciplinary dialogue, integrating the natural and social sciences, and bring together perspectives and scholars from the global North and South. Our aim is to cultivate a more holistic and grounded engagement with the scientific and political challenges we face, to truly understand the requirements of a genomics that centers the question of justice.
format Article
id doaj-art-6585e0cebfa34990ba8a8752ccf0cd8f
institution Kabale University
issn 1664-8021
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Genetics
spelling doaj-art-6585e0cebfa34990ba8a8752ccf0cd8f2025-08-20T03:28:40ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Genetics1664-80212025-07-011610.3389/fgene.2025.15233961523396Conceptualizing the public good for genomics in the global South: a cross-disciplinary roundtable dialogueTayyaba Jiwani0Adjua Akinwumi1Jocelyn Cheé-Santiago2Yulia Egorova3Gabriel Frassetto4Ricardo di Lazzaro Filho5Iscia Lopes-Cendes6Mercedes Okumura7José Antonio Alonso Pavón8Alice B. Popejoy9David Skinner10Peter Wade11Matthias Wienroth12Ernesto Schwartz-Marin13Michel Satya Naslavsky14Michel Satya Naslavsky15Department of Sociology, Philosophy, and Anthropology, University of Exeter, Exeter, United KingdomSchool of Communication, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, CanadaSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United StatesDepartment of Anthropology, University of Durham, Durham, United KingdomDepartment of Genetics and Evolutionary Biology, Biosciences Institute, University of São Paulo, SãoPaulo, BrazilDasa Genômica/Genera, Genômica, SãoPaulo, BrazilDepartment of Medical Genetics and Genomic Medicine, School of Medical Sciences; and Brazilian Institute of Neuroscience and Neurotechnology (BRAINN), University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, São Paulo, BrazilDepartment of Genetics and Evolutionary Biology, Biosciences Institute, University of São Paulo, SãoPaulo, BrazilFaculty of Sciences, National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), México City, MexicoDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, United States0School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom1Department of Social Anthropology, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom2School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United KingdomDepartment of Sociology, Philosophy, and Anthropology, University of Exeter, Exeter, United KingdomDepartment of Genetics and Evolutionary Biology, Biosciences Institute, University of São Paulo, SãoPaulo, Brazil3Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, SãoPaulo, BrazilSince the Human Genome Project, initiatives to genetically sequence and profile populations around the world have expanded rapidly. The rationales guiding this expansion are diverse: on the one hand, the concentration of genetic technologies in the global North threatens to widen the yawning gaps in healthcare available in advanced versus developing nations. On the other, more ‘genetic diversity’ in global databases can reveal new points of genetic variation associated with health or disease. This promises to pave the way to a more personalized medicine of the future—more powerful and prosperous, with tailored prevention regimens and genetic treatments targeted to every individual’s specific genetic vulnerabilities. These rationales are advanced to claim a public good case for genomics. However, the expansion of genomics to underserved populations in the global South has provoked many sociopolitical and ethical challenges. Critics have pointed to the inevitable entanglement of genomics with private commercial interests. These concerns are overlaid on deeper anxieties stemming from global asymmetries in scientific and technological power, and historical patterns of value extraction from colonized and marginalized populations. How then do we disentangle the public good? How do we build a genomics science that is just and equitable for the vast majority of the world? This conversation convenes leading genomics practitioners and critical science studies scholars to address these questions. We draw on an ongoing transdisciplinary dialogue, integrating the natural and social sciences, and bring together perspectives and scholars from the global North and South. Our aim is to cultivate a more holistic and grounded engagement with the scientific and political challenges we face, to truly understand the requirements of a genomics that centers the question of justice.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2025.1523396/fulljusticegenetic diversitysovereigntycapitalisminequalitygovernance
spellingShingle Tayyaba Jiwani
Adjua Akinwumi
Jocelyn Cheé-Santiago
Yulia Egorova
Gabriel Frassetto
Ricardo di Lazzaro Filho
Iscia Lopes-Cendes
Mercedes Okumura
José Antonio Alonso Pavón
Alice B. Popejoy
David Skinner
Peter Wade
Matthias Wienroth
Ernesto Schwartz-Marin
Michel Satya Naslavsky
Michel Satya Naslavsky
Conceptualizing the public good for genomics in the global South: a cross-disciplinary roundtable dialogue
Frontiers in Genetics
justice
genetic diversity
sovereignty
capitalism
inequality
governance
title Conceptualizing the public good for genomics in the global South: a cross-disciplinary roundtable dialogue
title_full Conceptualizing the public good for genomics in the global South: a cross-disciplinary roundtable dialogue
title_fullStr Conceptualizing the public good for genomics in the global South: a cross-disciplinary roundtable dialogue
title_full_unstemmed Conceptualizing the public good for genomics in the global South: a cross-disciplinary roundtable dialogue
title_short Conceptualizing the public good for genomics in the global South: a cross-disciplinary roundtable dialogue
title_sort conceptualizing the public good for genomics in the global south a cross disciplinary roundtable dialogue
topic justice
genetic diversity
sovereignty
capitalism
inequality
governance
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2025.1523396/full
work_keys_str_mv AT tayyabajiwani conceptualizingthepublicgoodforgenomicsintheglobalsouthacrossdisciplinaryroundtabledialogue
AT adjuaakinwumi conceptualizingthepublicgoodforgenomicsintheglobalsouthacrossdisciplinaryroundtabledialogue
AT jocelyncheesantiago conceptualizingthepublicgoodforgenomicsintheglobalsouthacrossdisciplinaryroundtabledialogue
AT yuliaegorova conceptualizingthepublicgoodforgenomicsintheglobalsouthacrossdisciplinaryroundtabledialogue
AT gabrielfrassetto conceptualizingthepublicgoodforgenomicsintheglobalsouthacrossdisciplinaryroundtabledialogue
AT ricardodilazzarofilho conceptualizingthepublicgoodforgenomicsintheglobalsouthacrossdisciplinaryroundtabledialogue
AT iscialopescendes conceptualizingthepublicgoodforgenomicsintheglobalsouthacrossdisciplinaryroundtabledialogue
AT mercedesokumura conceptualizingthepublicgoodforgenomicsintheglobalsouthacrossdisciplinaryroundtabledialogue
AT joseantonioalonsopavon conceptualizingthepublicgoodforgenomicsintheglobalsouthacrossdisciplinaryroundtabledialogue
AT alicebpopejoy conceptualizingthepublicgoodforgenomicsintheglobalsouthacrossdisciplinaryroundtabledialogue
AT davidskinner conceptualizingthepublicgoodforgenomicsintheglobalsouthacrossdisciplinaryroundtabledialogue
AT peterwade conceptualizingthepublicgoodforgenomicsintheglobalsouthacrossdisciplinaryroundtabledialogue
AT matthiaswienroth conceptualizingthepublicgoodforgenomicsintheglobalsouthacrossdisciplinaryroundtabledialogue
AT ernestoschwartzmarin conceptualizingthepublicgoodforgenomicsintheglobalsouthacrossdisciplinaryroundtabledialogue
AT michelsatyanaslavsky conceptualizingthepublicgoodforgenomicsintheglobalsouthacrossdisciplinaryroundtabledialogue
AT michelsatyanaslavsky conceptualizingthepublicgoodforgenomicsintheglobalsouthacrossdisciplinaryroundtabledialogue