Impact of Charlson Comorbidity Index on clinical outcomes of patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: a propensity score matching method
Objective Patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS) admitted into emergency department are usually combined with a high number of comorbidities. Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) is the most commonly used measure to assess comorbidity in clinical practice. However, the...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2025-08-01
|
| Series: | BMJ Open |
| Online Access: | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/15/8/e097359.full |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849239374708867072 |
|---|---|
| author | Rui He Wenfeng Tang Qianhui Zhou Manping Gu |
| author_facet | Rui He Wenfeng Tang Qianhui Zhou Manping Gu |
| author_sort | Rui He |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Objective Patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS) admitted into emergency department are usually combined with a high number of comorbidities. Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) is the most commonly used measure to assess comorbidity in clinical practice. However, the impact of CCI on the clinical outcomes of patients with NSTEACS are still unclear.Design A multicenter retrospective cohort study.Setting We used data from the Chongqing Medical University Medical Data Science Academy in Chongqing, China, which contains data from seven tertiary hospitals.Participants Data from 3308 consecutive patients aged over 18 diagnosed with NSTEACS admitted to emergency departments of seven hospitals from August 2012 to March 2023 were retrospectively analysed.Methods Patients were divided into two groups based on CCI: CCI <3 as low CCI, and CCI ≥3 as high CCI. A propensity score matching (PSM) analysis using the 1:1 nearest neighbour matching method with a calliper value of 0.02 was adopted to control for differences between the comparison cohorts. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were carried out to produce ORs with 95% CIs to identify whether the CCI is a potential independent predictor of in-hospital outcomes in the matched cohort.Primary and secondary outcome measures In-hospital mortality rate, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), length of stay and readmission rate.Results 876 and 2432 patients belonged to the high CCI group (CCI ≥3) and the low CCI group (CCI <3). After PSM, 618 pairs were matched. There were significant differences in sociodemographic, clinical characteristics and laboratory tests between the two groups before PSM. The results were balanced and comparable after PSM (p>0.05). In patients with high CCI, in-hospital mortality, the incidence of MACEs, length of stay (LOS) and readmission rate were significantly higher compared with those with low CCI. Univariate analysis revealed that a higher CCI was associated with an increased incidence of MACEs, prolonged LOS and a higher readmission rate. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that even after adjusting for various confounding factors, a higher CCI remained an independent risk factor for an increased incidence of MACEs, prolonged LOS and higher readmission rate.Conclusion A high CCI not only increases the risk of in-hospital MACEs but also prolongs the length of stay and increases the readmission rate. We recommend that the CCI be used as a crucial risk indicator for clinical practitioners to identify and manage patients with a poor prognosis. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-6582a817fb3c4d0e8328187d888510c2 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2044-6055 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-08-01 |
| publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMJ Open |
| spelling | doaj-art-6582a817fb3c4d0e8328187d888510c22025-08-20T04:01:01ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552025-08-0115810.1136/bmjopen-2024-097359Impact of Charlson Comorbidity Index on clinical outcomes of patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: a propensity score matching methodRui He0Wenfeng Tang1Qianhui Zhou2Manping Gu3Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, ChinaDepartment of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, ChinaDepartment of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, ChinaDepartment of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, ChinaObjective Patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS) admitted into emergency department are usually combined with a high number of comorbidities. Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) is the most commonly used measure to assess comorbidity in clinical practice. However, the impact of CCI on the clinical outcomes of patients with NSTEACS are still unclear.Design A multicenter retrospective cohort study.Setting We used data from the Chongqing Medical University Medical Data Science Academy in Chongqing, China, which contains data from seven tertiary hospitals.Participants Data from 3308 consecutive patients aged over 18 diagnosed with NSTEACS admitted to emergency departments of seven hospitals from August 2012 to March 2023 were retrospectively analysed.Methods Patients were divided into two groups based on CCI: CCI <3 as low CCI, and CCI ≥3 as high CCI. A propensity score matching (PSM) analysis using the 1:1 nearest neighbour matching method with a calliper value of 0.02 was adopted to control for differences between the comparison cohorts. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were carried out to produce ORs with 95% CIs to identify whether the CCI is a potential independent predictor of in-hospital outcomes in the matched cohort.Primary and secondary outcome measures In-hospital mortality rate, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), length of stay and readmission rate.Results 876 and 2432 patients belonged to the high CCI group (CCI ≥3) and the low CCI group (CCI <3). After PSM, 618 pairs were matched. There were significant differences in sociodemographic, clinical characteristics and laboratory tests between the two groups before PSM. The results were balanced and comparable after PSM (p>0.05). In patients with high CCI, in-hospital mortality, the incidence of MACEs, length of stay (LOS) and readmission rate were significantly higher compared with those with low CCI. Univariate analysis revealed that a higher CCI was associated with an increased incidence of MACEs, prolonged LOS and a higher readmission rate. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that even after adjusting for various confounding factors, a higher CCI remained an independent risk factor for an increased incidence of MACEs, prolonged LOS and higher readmission rate.Conclusion A high CCI not only increases the risk of in-hospital MACEs but also prolongs the length of stay and increases the readmission rate. We recommend that the CCI be used as a crucial risk indicator for clinical practitioners to identify and manage patients with a poor prognosis.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/15/8/e097359.full |
| spellingShingle | Rui He Wenfeng Tang Qianhui Zhou Manping Gu Impact of Charlson Comorbidity Index on clinical outcomes of patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: a propensity score matching method BMJ Open |
| title | Impact of Charlson Comorbidity Index on clinical outcomes of patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: a propensity score matching method |
| title_full | Impact of Charlson Comorbidity Index on clinical outcomes of patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: a propensity score matching method |
| title_fullStr | Impact of Charlson Comorbidity Index on clinical outcomes of patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: a propensity score matching method |
| title_full_unstemmed | Impact of Charlson Comorbidity Index on clinical outcomes of patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: a propensity score matching method |
| title_short | Impact of Charlson Comorbidity Index on clinical outcomes of patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: a propensity score matching method |
| title_sort | impact of charlson comorbidity index on clinical outcomes of patients with non st segment elevation acute coronary syndrome a propensity score matching method |
| url | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/15/8/e097359.full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ruihe impactofcharlsoncomorbidityindexonclinicaloutcomesofpatientswithnonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndromeapropensityscorematchingmethod AT wenfengtang impactofcharlsoncomorbidityindexonclinicaloutcomesofpatientswithnonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndromeapropensityscorematchingmethod AT qianhuizhou impactofcharlsoncomorbidityindexonclinicaloutcomesofpatientswithnonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndromeapropensityscorematchingmethod AT manpinggu impactofcharlsoncomorbidityindexonclinicaloutcomesofpatientswithnonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndromeapropensityscorematchingmethod |