Comparison of Different Restoration Techniques for Endodontically Treated Teeth
The aim of the present study is to evaluate the physical properties of endodontically treated teeth restored with five different restorative techniques and materials. Hundred and forty extracted human molar teeth were used. In addition to five restoration groups, specimens with no restorations were...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2022-01-01
|
| Series: | International Journal of Biomaterials |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6643825 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850221624442224640 |
|---|---|
| author | Jusuf Lukarcanin İsmail Serhat Sadıkoğlu Bilal Yaşa Lezize Şebnem Türkün Murat Türkün |
| author_facet | Jusuf Lukarcanin İsmail Serhat Sadıkoğlu Bilal Yaşa Lezize Şebnem Türkün Murat Türkün |
| author_sort | Jusuf Lukarcanin |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The aim of the present study is to evaluate the physical properties of endodontically treated teeth restored with five different restorative techniques and materials. Hundred and forty extracted human molar teeth were used. In addition to five restoration groups, specimens with no restorations were used as the negative control, and intact molar teeth were used as the positive control. For flexural strength tests, material specimens were made from 5 different materials using a mould according to ISO 4049 standards. One-way ANOVA revealed that the fracture resistance was significantly affected by the restoration type. SFRC group showed the best fracture resistance values, while lowest values were seen in the GWF group. The test results of flexural strength showed values between 140 and 184 MPa and modulus of elasticity between 6.33 and 18.89 GPa (p<0.05). Under the limits of this study, results showed that SFRC can be used to increase the fracture resistance of ETT. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-655756056a124b8b97889751e6ee8cb6 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 1687-8795 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2022-01-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | International Journal of Biomaterials |
| spelling | doaj-art-655756056a124b8b97889751e6ee8cb62025-08-20T02:06:40ZengWileyInternational Journal of Biomaterials1687-87952022-01-01202210.1155/2022/6643825Comparison of Different Restoration Techniques for Endodontically Treated TeethJusuf Lukarcanin0İsmail Serhat Sadıkoğlu1Bilal Yaşa2Lezize Şebnem Türkün3Murat Türkün4Medicana International Izmir HospıtalEuropean University of LefkeIzmir Katip Celebi UniversityEge UniversityEge UniversityThe aim of the present study is to evaluate the physical properties of endodontically treated teeth restored with five different restorative techniques and materials. Hundred and forty extracted human molar teeth were used. In addition to five restoration groups, specimens with no restorations were used as the negative control, and intact molar teeth were used as the positive control. For flexural strength tests, material specimens were made from 5 different materials using a mould according to ISO 4049 standards. One-way ANOVA revealed that the fracture resistance was significantly affected by the restoration type. SFRC group showed the best fracture resistance values, while lowest values were seen in the GWF group. The test results of flexural strength showed values between 140 and 184 MPa and modulus of elasticity between 6.33 and 18.89 GPa (p<0.05). Under the limits of this study, results showed that SFRC can be used to increase the fracture resistance of ETT.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6643825 |
| spellingShingle | Jusuf Lukarcanin İsmail Serhat Sadıkoğlu Bilal Yaşa Lezize Şebnem Türkün Murat Türkün Comparison of Different Restoration Techniques for Endodontically Treated Teeth International Journal of Biomaterials |
| title | Comparison of Different Restoration Techniques for Endodontically Treated Teeth |
| title_full | Comparison of Different Restoration Techniques for Endodontically Treated Teeth |
| title_fullStr | Comparison of Different Restoration Techniques for Endodontically Treated Teeth |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Different Restoration Techniques for Endodontically Treated Teeth |
| title_short | Comparison of Different Restoration Techniques for Endodontically Treated Teeth |
| title_sort | comparison of different restoration techniques for endodontically treated teeth |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6643825 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT jusuflukarcanin comparisonofdifferentrestorationtechniquesforendodonticallytreatedteeth AT ismailserhatsadıkoglu comparisonofdifferentrestorationtechniquesforendodonticallytreatedteeth AT bilalyasa comparisonofdifferentrestorationtechniquesforendodonticallytreatedteeth AT lezizesebnemturkun comparisonofdifferentrestorationtechniquesforendodonticallytreatedteeth AT muratturkun comparisonofdifferentrestorationtechniquesforendodonticallytreatedteeth |