Validating Left Ventricular Filling Pressure Measurements in Patients with Congestive Heart Failure: CardioMEMS™ Pulmonary Arterial Diastolic Pressure versus Left Atrial Pressure Measurement by Transthoracic Echocardiography

Background. Routine ambulatory echocardiographic estimates of left ventricular (LV) filling pressures are not cost-effective and are occasionally fraught with anatomic, physiologic as well as logistical limitations. The use of implantable hemodynamic devices such as CardioMEMS Heart Failure (HF) Sys...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sunit Tolia, Zubair Khan, Gunjan Gholkar, Marcel Zughaib
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2018-01-01
Series:Cardiology Research and Practice
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8568356
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850221720731910144
author Sunit Tolia
Zubair Khan
Gunjan Gholkar
Marcel Zughaib
author_facet Sunit Tolia
Zubair Khan
Gunjan Gholkar
Marcel Zughaib
author_sort Sunit Tolia
collection DOAJ
description Background. Routine ambulatory echocardiographic estimates of left ventricular (LV) filling pressures are not cost-effective and are occasionally fraught with anatomic, physiologic as well as logistical limitations. The use of implantable hemodynamic devices such as CardioMEMS Heart Failure (HF) System has been shown to reduce HF-related readmission rates by remote monitoring of LV filling pressures. Little is known about the correlation between CardioMEMS and echocardiography-derived estimates of central hemodynamics. Methods. We performed a prospective, single-center study enrolling seventeen participants with New York Heart Association functional class II-III HF and preimplanted CardioMEMS sensor. Simultaneous CardioMEMS readings and a limited echocardiogram were performed at individual clinic visits. Estimated left atrial pressure (LAP) by echocardiogram was calculated by the Nagueh formula. Linear regression was used as a measure of agreement. Variability between methods was evaluated by Bland–Altman analysis. Results. Mean age was 74 ± 9 years; 59% (10/17) were males. LV systolic dysfunction was present in 76% (13/17) of subjects. Mean PAdP was 18 ± 4 mmHg and 19 ± 5 mmHg for CardioMEMS and echocardiographic-derived estimates, respectively, with a significant correlation between both methods (r2=0.798,  p≤0.001). Conclusions. Our study illustrates a direct linear correlation between PAdP measured by CardioMEMS and simultaneous measurement of LV filling pressures derived by echocardiography.
format Article
id doaj-art-6533c92ea9ce419e812de883afbf6154
institution OA Journals
issn 2090-8016
2090-0597
language English
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Cardiology Research and Practice
spelling doaj-art-6533c92ea9ce419e812de883afbf61542025-08-20T02:06:39ZengWileyCardiology Research and Practice2090-80162090-05972018-01-01201810.1155/2018/85683568568356Validating Left Ventricular Filling Pressure Measurements in Patients with Congestive Heart Failure: CardioMEMS™ Pulmonary Arterial Diastolic Pressure versus Left Atrial Pressure Measurement by Transthoracic EchocardiographySunit Tolia0Zubair Khan1Gunjan Gholkar2Marcel Zughaib3Department of Cardiology, Providence-Providence Park Hospital, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, 16001 W. Nine Mile Road, Southfield, MI 48075, USADepartment of Cardiology, Providence-Providence Park Hospital, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, 16001 W. Nine Mile Road, Southfield, MI 48075, USADepartment of Cardiology, Providence-Providence Park Hospital, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, 16001 W. Nine Mile Road, Southfield, MI 48075, USADepartment of Cardiology, Providence-Providence Park Hospital, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, 16001 W. Nine Mile Road, Southfield, MI 48075, USABackground. Routine ambulatory echocardiographic estimates of left ventricular (LV) filling pressures are not cost-effective and are occasionally fraught with anatomic, physiologic as well as logistical limitations. The use of implantable hemodynamic devices such as CardioMEMS Heart Failure (HF) System has been shown to reduce HF-related readmission rates by remote monitoring of LV filling pressures. Little is known about the correlation between CardioMEMS and echocardiography-derived estimates of central hemodynamics. Methods. We performed a prospective, single-center study enrolling seventeen participants with New York Heart Association functional class II-III HF and preimplanted CardioMEMS sensor. Simultaneous CardioMEMS readings and a limited echocardiogram were performed at individual clinic visits. Estimated left atrial pressure (LAP) by echocardiogram was calculated by the Nagueh formula. Linear regression was used as a measure of agreement. Variability between methods was evaluated by Bland–Altman analysis. Results. Mean age was 74 ± 9 years; 59% (10/17) were males. LV systolic dysfunction was present in 76% (13/17) of subjects. Mean PAdP was 18 ± 4 mmHg and 19 ± 5 mmHg for CardioMEMS and echocardiographic-derived estimates, respectively, with a significant correlation between both methods (r2=0.798,  p≤0.001). Conclusions. Our study illustrates a direct linear correlation between PAdP measured by CardioMEMS and simultaneous measurement of LV filling pressures derived by echocardiography.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8568356
spellingShingle Sunit Tolia
Zubair Khan
Gunjan Gholkar
Marcel Zughaib
Validating Left Ventricular Filling Pressure Measurements in Patients with Congestive Heart Failure: CardioMEMS™ Pulmonary Arterial Diastolic Pressure versus Left Atrial Pressure Measurement by Transthoracic Echocardiography
Cardiology Research and Practice
title Validating Left Ventricular Filling Pressure Measurements in Patients with Congestive Heart Failure: CardioMEMS™ Pulmonary Arterial Diastolic Pressure versus Left Atrial Pressure Measurement by Transthoracic Echocardiography
title_full Validating Left Ventricular Filling Pressure Measurements in Patients with Congestive Heart Failure: CardioMEMS™ Pulmonary Arterial Diastolic Pressure versus Left Atrial Pressure Measurement by Transthoracic Echocardiography
title_fullStr Validating Left Ventricular Filling Pressure Measurements in Patients with Congestive Heart Failure: CardioMEMS™ Pulmonary Arterial Diastolic Pressure versus Left Atrial Pressure Measurement by Transthoracic Echocardiography
title_full_unstemmed Validating Left Ventricular Filling Pressure Measurements in Patients with Congestive Heart Failure: CardioMEMS™ Pulmonary Arterial Diastolic Pressure versus Left Atrial Pressure Measurement by Transthoracic Echocardiography
title_short Validating Left Ventricular Filling Pressure Measurements in Patients with Congestive Heart Failure: CardioMEMS™ Pulmonary Arterial Diastolic Pressure versus Left Atrial Pressure Measurement by Transthoracic Echocardiography
title_sort validating left ventricular filling pressure measurements in patients with congestive heart failure cardiomems™ pulmonary arterial diastolic pressure versus left atrial pressure measurement by transthoracic echocardiography
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8568356
work_keys_str_mv AT sunittolia validatingleftventricularfillingpressuremeasurementsinpatientswithcongestiveheartfailurecardiomemspulmonaryarterialdiastolicpressureversusleftatrialpressuremeasurementbytransthoracicechocardiography
AT zubairkhan validatingleftventricularfillingpressuremeasurementsinpatientswithcongestiveheartfailurecardiomemspulmonaryarterialdiastolicpressureversusleftatrialpressuremeasurementbytransthoracicechocardiography
AT gunjangholkar validatingleftventricularfillingpressuremeasurementsinpatientswithcongestiveheartfailurecardiomemspulmonaryarterialdiastolicpressureversusleftatrialpressuremeasurementbytransthoracicechocardiography
AT marcelzughaib validatingleftventricularfillingpressuremeasurementsinpatientswithcongestiveheartfailurecardiomemspulmonaryarterialdiastolicpressureversusleftatrialpressuremeasurementbytransthoracicechocardiography