Long-term Results of Two Different Surgical Techniques Used in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Objective Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), the compression of the median nerve under the carpal ligament, is the most common peripheral nerve entrapment of the upper extremity. While conservative treatment is used for patients with mild and moderate symptoms, surgical treatment is preferred for severe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Serdar Ercan, Zeki Serdar Ataizi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. 2021-03-01
Series:Indian Journal of Neurosurgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0041-1725209
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849412018479562752
author Serdar Ercan
Zeki Serdar Ataizi
author_facet Serdar Ercan
Zeki Serdar Ataizi
author_sort Serdar Ercan
collection DOAJ
description Objective Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), the compression of the median nerve under the carpal ligament, is the most common peripheral nerve entrapment of the upper extremity. While conservative treatment is used for patients with mild and moderate symptoms, surgical treatment is preferred for severe symptoms. The aim of the study is to evaluate the difference between transverse and longitudinal incision by comparing postoperative pain and recurrence rates. Methods The patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical incision type. Surgical intervention was applied to patients in group T (transverse incision) and group L (longitudinal incision) by the same two surgeons in each group. All patients were followed-up with electromyography (EMG) and performance scale before and after surgical treatment. If the postoperative EMG result was similar to the preoperative EMG result, it was accepted as recurrent CTS. Results A total of 418 patients were included to the study. Six patients in the group T with transverse incision, and 18 patients in the group L with longitudinal incision, were reoperated for an average of 6 ± 2 months after the primary surgery. Conclusion Complications are less, and recurrent nerve compression is less in longitudinal approach, since surgical intervention is performed by seeing the median nerve directly.
format Article
id doaj-art-651c9fef36f645adb453a5edf2ea5450
institution Kabale University
issn 2277-954X
2277-9167
language English
publishDate 2021-03-01
publisher Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
record_format Article
series Indian Journal of Neurosurgery
spelling doaj-art-651c9fef36f645adb453a5edf2ea54502025-08-20T03:34:35ZengThieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.Indian Journal of Neurosurgery2277-954X2277-91672021-03-01100106506810.1055/s-0041-1725209Long-term Results of Two Different Surgical Techniques Used in Carpal Tunnel SyndromeSerdar Ercan0Zeki Serdar Ataizi1Department of Neurosurgery, Eskisehir City Hospital, Eskisehir, TurkeyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Yunus Emre State Hospital, Eskisehir, TurkeyObjective Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), the compression of the median nerve under the carpal ligament, is the most common peripheral nerve entrapment of the upper extremity. While conservative treatment is used for patients with mild and moderate symptoms, surgical treatment is preferred for severe symptoms. The aim of the study is to evaluate the difference between transverse and longitudinal incision by comparing postoperative pain and recurrence rates. Methods The patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical incision type. Surgical intervention was applied to patients in group T (transverse incision) and group L (longitudinal incision) by the same two surgeons in each group. All patients were followed-up with electromyography (EMG) and performance scale before and after surgical treatment. If the postoperative EMG result was similar to the preoperative EMG result, it was accepted as recurrent CTS. Results A total of 418 patients were included to the study. Six patients in the group T with transverse incision, and 18 patients in the group L with longitudinal incision, were reoperated for an average of 6 ± 2 months after the primary surgery. Conclusion Complications are less, and recurrent nerve compression is less in longitudinal approach, since surgical intervention is performed by seeing the median nerve directly.http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0041-1725209peripheral nervecarpal tunnelentrapmentsurgical approachrecurrence
spellingShingle Serdar Ercan
Zeki Serdar Ataizi
Long-term Results of Two Different Surgical Techniques Used in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Indian Journal of Neurosurgery
peripheral nerve
carpal tunnel
entrapment
surgical approach
recurrence
title Long-term Results of Two Different Surgical Techniques Used in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
title_full Long-term Results of Two Different Surgical Techniques Used in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
title_fullStr Long-term Results of Two Different Surgical Techniques Used in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
title_full_unstemmed Long-term Results of Two Different Surgical Techniques Used in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
title_short Long-term Results of Two Different Surgical Techniques Used in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
title_sort long term results of two different surgical techniques used in carpal tunnel syndrome
topic peripheral nerve
carpal tunnel
entrapment
surgical approach
recurrence
url http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0041-1725209
work_keys_str_mv AT serdarercan longtermresultsoftwodifferentsurgicaltechniquesusedincarpaltunnelsyndrome
AT zekiserdarataizi longtermresultsoftwodifferentsurgicaltechniquesusedincarpaltunnelsyndrome