De l’intention de l’artiste à l’effet de l’œuvre. Changer l’approche en conservation ?

Contemporary art is no longer about contemplation (where aesthetics and history are expressed together), but about life span, action and interaction. The artist uses technical means to fulfill the aesthetic function: they aim to have an “effect”. The material and functional analysis and the technica...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Muriel Verbeeck
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Association CeROArt 2019-01-01
Series:CeROArt : Conservation, Exposition, Restauration d'Objets d'Art
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/ceroart/6020
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832578105951125504
author Muriel Verbeeck
author_facet Muriel Verbeeck
author_sort Muriel Verbeeck
collection DOAJ
description Contemporary art is no longer about contemplation (where aesthetics and history are expressed together), but about life span, action and interaction. The artist uses technical means to fulfill the aesthetic function: they aim to have an “effect”. The material and functional analysis and the technical and analytical approach are not enough to explain this. The thought of the philosopher G. Genette could provide interesting leads. His definition of the work of art and the concept of attentionality are particularly fruitful for the conservator.
format Article
id doaj-art-64c1564f336e4e2dace467f62c374a69
institution Kabale University
issn 1784-5092
language English
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Association CeROArt
record_format Article
series CeROArt : Conservation, Exposition, Restauration d'Objets d'Art
spelling doaj-art-64c1564f336e4e2dace467f62c374a692025-01-30T14:14:14ZengAssociation CeROArtCeROArt : Conservation, Exposition, Restauration d'Objets d'Art1784-50922019-01-0110.4000/ceroart.6020De l’intention de l’artiste à l’effet de l’œuvre. Changer l’approche en conservation ?Muriel VerbeeckContemporary art is no longer about contemplation (where aesthetics and history are expressed together), but about life span, action and interaction. The artist uses technical means to fulfill the aesthetic function: they aim to have an “effect”. The material and functional analysis and the technical and analytical approach are not enough to explain this. The thought of the philosopher G. Genette could provide interesting leads. His definition of the work of art and the concept of attentionality are particularly fruitful for the conservator.https://journals.openedition.org/ceroart/6020contemporary arteffectGenetteontologyintentintention
spellingShingle Muriel Verbeeck
De l’intention de l’artiste à l’effet de l’œuvre. Changer l’approche en conservation ?
CeROArt : Conservation, Exposition, Restauration d'Objets d'Art
contemporary art
effect
Genette
ontology
intent
intention
title De l’intention de l’artiste à l’effet de l’œuvre. Changer l’approche en conservation ?
title_full De l’intention de l’artiste à l’effet de l’œuvre. Changer l’approche en conservation ?
title_fullStr De l’intention de l’artiste à l’effet de l’œuvre. Changer l’approche en conservation ?
title_full_unstemmed De l’intention de l’artiste à l’effet de l’œuvre. Changer l’approche en conservation ?
title_short De l’intention de l’artiste à l’effet de l’œuvre. Changer l’approche en conservation ?
title_sort de l intention de l artiste a l effet de l oeuvre changer l approche en conservation
topic contemporary art
effect
Genette
ontology
intent
intention
url https://journals.openedition.org/ceroart/6020
work_keys_str_mv AT murielverbeeck delintentiondelartistealeffetdelœuvrechangerlapprocheenconservation