Targeted Prostate Biopsies Overestimate International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Group, Particularly in Smaller Tumors

Compared with systematic biopsy of the prostate, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted biopsies are associated with lower rates of upgrading and higher rates of downgrading between biopsy tissue and radical prostatectomy (RP) specimen International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade gr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lisa J. Kroon, Ivo I. de Vos, Charlotte F. Kweldam, Monique J. Roobol, Geert J.L.H. van Leenders, Roderick C.N. van den Bergh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-05-01
Series:European Urology Open Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666168325000850
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849713083618951168
author Lisa J. Kroon
Ivo I. de Vos
Charlotte F. Kweldam
Monique J. Roobol
Geert J.L.H. van Leenders
Roderick C.N. van den Bergh
author_facet Lisa J. Kroon
Ivo I. de Vos
Charlotte F. Kweldam
Monique J. Roobol
Geert J.L.H. van Leenders
Roderick C.N. van den Bergh
author_sort Lisa J. Kroon
collection DOAJ
description Compared with systematic biopsy of the prostate, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted biopsies are associated with lower rates of upgrading and higher rates of downgrading between biopsy tissue and radical prostatectomy (RP) specimen International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade group (GG). Higher rates of downgrading could indicate overtreatment for some patients. We hypothesized that concordance rates between biopsy and RP are different per MRI tumor volume. We conducted an explorative retrospective study to identify the risk factors for downgrading, using RP specimens as the reference standard, in a large regional prostate collaboration. Among 616 patients, pathological concordance was seen in 58% and downgrading in 15%. The risk of downgrading was 18% for tumors of 0–10 mm, 14% for 10–20 mm, and 14% for >20 mm. In a multivariable analysis among patients with targeted biopsy GG ≥2, with covariates including clinical tumor stage, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), maximal MRI index lesion diameter, number of positive target biopsies, and GG at targeted biopsy, the statistically significant predictors for downgrading were PSA, maximum MRI index lesion diameter, and target biopsy GG. A lower risk of downgrading was seen in larger tumors (odds ratio per millimeter 0.95, 95% confidence interval 0.91–1.00, p = 0.033). This study suggests that an overestimation of GG on biopsy is most common in smaller MRI lesions. This information is important in clinical decision-making, mainly in deciding on active surveillance versus active therapy or the indication for additional imaging for cancer staging. Patient summary: In this report, we examined risk factors that could explain why some patients have higher pathological grading at prostate biopsy than on the whole prostate specimen after surgical removal. We found that patients with prostate biopsies that are targeted at small lesions on magnetic resonance imaging and patients who had high biopsy grading had a higher risk of having lower grading of their surgical specimens.
format Article
id doaj-art-649ffbdc96a44a00988de4a2bdc5a1b4
institution DOAJ
issn 2666-1683
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series European Urology Open Science
spelling doaj-art-649ffbdc96a44a00988de4a2bdc5a1b42025-08-20T03:14:03ZengElsevierEuropean Urology Open Science2666-16832025-05-017571010.1016/j.euros.2025.02.008Targeted Prostate Biopsies Overestimate International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Group, Particularly in Smaller TumorsLisa J. Kroon0Ivo I. de Vos1Charlotte F. Kweldam2Monique J. Roobol3Geert J.L.H. van Leenders4Roderick C.N. van den Bergh5Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Corresponding author. Department of Pathology and Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Tel. +31107040704.Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The NetherlandsDepartment of Pathology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The NetherlandsDepartment of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The NetherlandsDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The NetherlandsDepartment of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The NetherlandsCompared with systematic biopsy of the prostate, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted biopsies are associated with lower rates of upgrading and higher rates of downgrading between biopsy tissue and radical prostatectomy (RP) specimen International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade group (GG). Higher rates of downgrading could indicate overtreatment for some patients. We hypothesized that concordance rates between biopsy and RP are different per MRI tumor volume. We conducted an explorative retrospective study to identify the risk factors for downgrading, using RP specimens as the reference standard, in a large regional prostate collaboration. Among 616 patients, pathological concordance was seen in 58% and downgrading in 15%. The risk of downgrading was 18% for tumors of 0–10 mm, 14% for 10–20 mm, and 14% for >20 mm. In a multivariable analysis among patients with targeted biopsy GG ≥2, with covariates including clinical tumor stage, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), maximal MRI index lesion diameter, number of positive target biopsies, and GG at targeted biopsy, the statistically significant predictors for downgrading were PSA, maximum MRI index lesion diameter, and target biopsy GG. A lower risk of downgrading was seen in larger tumors (odds ratio per millimeter 0.95, 95% confidence interval 0.91–1.00, p = 0.033). This study suggests that an overestimation of GG on biopsy is most common in smaller MRI lesions. This information is important in clinical decision-making, mainly in deciding on active surveillance versus active therapy or the indication for additional imaging for cancer staging. Patient summary: In this report, we examined risk factors that could explain why some patients have higher pathological grading at prostate biopsy than on the whole prostate specimen after surgical removal. We found that patients with prostate biopsies that are targeted at small lesions on magnetic resonance imaging and patients who had high biopsy grading had a higher risk of having lower grading of their surgical specimens.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666168325000850DowngradingGleason gradeProstate cancerRadical prostatectomyTargeted biopsy
spellingShingle Lisa J. Kroon
Ivo I. de Vos
Charlotte F. Kweldam
Monique J. Roobol
Geert J.L.H. van Leenders
Roderick C.N. van den Bergh
Targeted Prostate Biopsies Overestimate International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Group, Particularly in Smaller Tumors
European Urology Open Science
Downgrading
Gleason grade
Prostate cancer
Radical prostatectomy
Targeted biopsy
title Targeted Prostate Biopsies Overestimate International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Group, Particularly in Smaller Tumors
title_full Targeted Prostate Biopsies Overestimate International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Group, Particularly in Smaller Tumors
title_fullStr Targeted Prostate Biopsies Overestimate International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Group, Particularly in Smaller Tumors
title_full_unstemmed Targeted Prostate Biopsies Overestimate International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Group, Particularly in Smaller Tumors
title_short Targeted Prostate Biopsies Overestimate International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Group, Particularly in Smaller Tumors
title_sort targeted prostate biopsies overestimate international society of urological pathology grade group particularly in smaller tumors
topic Downgrading
Gleason grade
Prostate cancer
Radical prostatectomy
Targeted biopsy
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666168325000850
work_keys_str_mv AT lisajkroon targetedprostatebiopsiesoverestimateinternationalsocietyofurologicalpathologygradegroupparticularlyinsmallertumors
AT ivoidevos targetedprostatebiopsiesoverestimateinternationalsocietyofurologicalpathologygradegroupparticularlyinsmallertumors
AT charlottefkweldam targetedprostatebiopsiesoverestimateinternationalsocietyofurologicalpathologygradegroupparticularlyinsmallertumors
AT moniquejroobol targetedprostatebiopsiesoverestimateinternationalsocietyofurologicalpathologygradegroupparticularlyinsmallertumors
AT geertjlhvanleenders targetedprostatebiopsiesoverestimateinternationalsocietyofurologicalpathologygradegroupparticularlyinsmallertumors
AT roderickcnvandenbergh targetedprostatebiopsiesoverestimateinternationalsocietyofurologicalpathologygradegroupparticularlyinsmallertumors