Relationships between state-level general population alcohol policies and birth outcomes: Results from 1972-2019 vital statistics.

<h4>Background</h4>Research has found that policies that single out pregnant people's alcohol consumption are mostly ineffective. Identifying alternative approaches - for example, general population alcohol policies - that can reduce adverse effects of pregnant people's alcohol...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Meenakshi S Subbaraman, Nancy F Berglas, William C Kerr, Sarah C M Roberts
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2025-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0327559
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849391025390354432
author Meenakshi S Subbaraman
Nancy F Berglas
William C Kerr
Sarah C M Roberts
author_facet Meenakshi S Subbaraman
Nancy F Berglas
William C Kerr
Sarah C M Roberts
author_sort Meenakshi S Subbaraman
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Background</h4>Research has found that policies that single out pregnant people's alcohol consumption are mostly ineffective. Identifying alternative approaches - for example, general population alcohol policies - that can reduce adverse effects of pregnant people's alcohol consumption is essential. Here, we examine how U.S. state-level alcohol policies regarding grocery store and gas station sales, Sunday sales, Blood Alcohol Concentration limits for driving, and government monopolies relate to birth outcomes.<h4>Methods</h4>Outcome data came from the 1972-2019 U.S. Vital Statistics System birth certificates (N = 160,538,939 live singleton births). Primary outcomes were low birthweight (<2,500 grams) and preterm birth (<37 weeks). Fully adjusted models included state and year fixed effects, state-specific time trends, and maternal- and state-level covariates with standard errors clustered by state.<h4>Results</h4>The only significant, robust associations between policies and outcomes were for government monopolies. In fully adjusted models, having a government monopoly on spirits or on both spirits and wine retail sales (vs. none) were each related to lower odds of low birthweight births (aOR=0.94, 95% CI: 0.93, 0.95; aOR=0.95, 95% CI: 0.92, 0.98 respectively). Having a government monopoly on spirits sales was also significantly related to lower odds of preterm births (aOR=0.97, 95% CI: 0.95, 1.00).<h4>Conclusions</h4>Government monopolies on spirits and wine relate to better birth outcomes. Findings underscore the importance of maintaining state government monopolies on spirits and wine as a strategy for protecting against adverse effects of pregnant people's drinking.
format Article
id doaj-art-641ba27dc22d4e5a97b711019966a99f
institution Kabale University
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-641ba27dc22d4e5a97b711019966a99f2025-08-20T03:41:14ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032025-01-01208e032755910.1371/journal.pone.0327559Relationships between state-level general population alcohol policies and birth outcomes: Results from 1972-2019 vital statistics.Meenakshi S SubbaramanNancy F BerglasWilliam C KerrSarah C M Roberts<h4>Background</h4>Research has found that policies that single out pregnant people's alcohol consumption are mostly ineffective. Identifying alternative approaches - for example, general population alcohol policies - that can reduce adverse effects of pregnant people's alcohol consumption is essential. Here, we examine how U.S. state-level alcohol policies regarding grocery store and gas station sales, Sunday sales, Blood Alcohol Concentration limits for driving, and government monopolies relate to birth outcomes.<h4>Methods</h4>Outcome data came from the 1972-2019 U.S. Vital Statistics System birth certificates (N = 160,538,939 live singleton births). Primary outcomes were low birthweight (<2,500 grams) and preterm birth (<37 weeks). Fully adjusted models included state and year fixed effects, state-specific time trends, and maternal- and state-level covariates with standard errors clustered by state.<h4>Results</h4>The only significant, robust associations between policies and outcomes were for government monopolies. In fully adjusted models, having a government monopoly on spirits or on both spirits and wine retail sales (vs. none) were each related to lower odds of low birthweight births (aOR=0.94, 95% CI: 0.93, 0.95; aOR=0.95, 95% CI: 0.92, 0.98 respectively). Having a government monopoly on spirits sales was also significantly related to lower odds of preterm births (aOR=0.97, 95% CI: 0.95, 1.00).<h4>Conclusions</h4>Government monopolies on spirits and wine relate to better birth outcomes. Findings underscore the importance of maintaining state government monopolies on spirits and wine as a strategy for protecting against adverse effects of pregnant people's drinking.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0327559
spellingShingle Meenakshi S Subbaraman
Nancy F Berglas
William C Kerr
Sarah C M Roberts
Relationships between state-level general population alcohol policies and birth outcomes: Results from 1972-2019 vital statistics.
PLoS ONE
title Relationships between state-level general population alcohol policies and birth outcomes: Results from 1972-2019 vital statistics.
title_full Relationships between state-level general population alcohol policies and birth outcomes: Results from 1972-2019 vital statistics.
title_fullStr Relationships between state-level general population alcohol policies and birth outcomes: Results from 1972-2019 vital statistics.
title_full_unstemmed Relationships between state-level general population alcohol policies and birth outcomes: Results from 1972-2019 vital statistics.
title_short Relationships between state-level general population alcohol policies and birth outcomes: Results from 1972-2019 vital statistics.
title_sort relationships between state level general population alcohol policies and birth outcomes results from 1972 2019 vital statistics
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0327559
work_keys_str_mv AT meenakshissubbaraman relationshipsbetweenstatelevelgeneralpopulationalcoholpoliciesandbirthoutcomesresultsfrom19722019vitalstatistics
AT nancyfberglas relationshipsbetweenstatelevelgeneralpopulationalcoholpoliciesandbirthoutcomesresultsfrom19722019vitalstatistics
AT williamckerr relationshipsbetweenstatelevelgeneralpopulationalcoholpoliciesandbirthoutcomesresultsfrom19722019vitalstatistics
AT sarahcmroberts relationshipsbetweenstatelevelgeneralpopulationalcoholpoliciesandbirthoutcomesresultsfrom19722019vitalstatistics