Overcoming System Complexity using Models and Knowledge Structures. Editorial Introduction to Issue 36 of CSIMQ

Models allow us to simplify reality and give advantages to both decomposition and abstraction. Models can have various forms from textual, tabular, mathematical, and graphical to a combination of these formats. Formal models can be processed, or even executed, by machines. An engineering model must...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Erika Nazaruka, Tarmo Robal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Riga Technical University Press 2023-10-01
Series:Complex Systems Informatics and Modeling Quarterly
Subjects:
Online Access:https://csimq-journals.rtu.lv/article/view/7960
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832542957995032576
author Erika Nazaruka
Tarmo Robal
author_facet Erika Nazaruka
Tarmo Robal
author_sort Erika Nazaruka
collection DOAJ
description Models allow us to simplify reality and give advantages to both decomposition and abstraction. Models can have various forms from textual, tabular, mathematical, and graphical to a combination of these formats. Formal models can be processed, or even executed, by machines. An engineering model must satisfy such characteristics as abstraction, understandability, accuracy, predictiveness, and inexpensiveness. Models explicitly represent knowledge of the modeled domain in a form suitable for reasoning about them and learning. Knowledge may be descriptive, structural, procedural, meta-, or heuristic. Focus on one type of knowledge during the analysis may ignore the other one. Moreover, analysis and reasoning also rely on data representation forms which may lose accuracy due to simplification and different assumptions. Therefore, completeness, correctness, and adequacy of knowledge as well as particularities of the representing structure may affect the results of knowledge processing and decision making. Therefore, the capability of models (and other structures) to represent knowledge completely, adequately, and accurately is still a matter of various research activities. This issue of CSIMQ is devoted to this matter.
format Article
id doaj-art-6407f3d5a304418a883aec0ed36d9349
institution Kabale University
issn 2255-9922
language English
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher Riga Technical University Press
record_format Article
series Complex Systems Informatics and Modeling Quarterly
spelling doaj-art-6407f3d5a304418a883aec0ed36d93492025-02-03T12:03:20ZengRiga Technical University PressComplex Systems Informatics and Modeling Quarterly2255-99222023-10-0103610.7250/csimq.2023-36.003385Overcoming System Complexity using Models and Knowledge Structures. Editorial Introduction to Issue 36 of CSIMQErika Nazaruka0Tarmo Robal1Institute of Applied Computer Systems, Riga Technical University, 6A Kipsalas Street, Riga, LV-1048Tallinn University of Technology, 3, Ehitajate tee 5, 19086, TallinnModels allow us to simplify reality and give advantages to both decomposition and abstraction. Models can have various forms from textual, tabular, mathematical, and graphical to a combination of these formats. Formal models can be processed, or even executed, by machines. An engineering model must satisfy such characteristics as abstraction, understandability, accuracy, predictiveness, and inexpensiveness. Models explicitly represent knowledge of the modeled domain in a form suitable for reasoning about them and learning. Knowledge may be descriptive, structural, procedural, meta-, or heuristic. Focus on one type of knowledge during the analysis may ignore the other one. Moreover, analysis and reasoning also rely on data representation forms which may lose accuracy due to simplification and different assumptions. Therefore, completeness, correctness, and adequacy of knowledge as well as particularities of the representing structure may affect the results of knowledge processing and decision making. Therefore, the capability of models (and other structures) to represent knowledge completely, adequately, and accurately is still a matter of various research activities. This issue of CSIMQ is devoted to this matter.https://csimq-journals.rtu.lv/article/view/7960knowledge graphdesign science researchagent-based modelmetamodelland use modelingenterprise modelingfractal enterprise modelinginnovationcapabilitylow-code development
spellingShingle Erika Nazaruka
Tarmo Robal
Overcoming System Complexity using Models and Knowledge Structures. Editorial Introduction to Issue 36 of CSIMQ
Complex Systems Informatics and Modeling Quarterly
knowledge graph
design science research
agent-based model
metamodel
land use modeling
enterprise modeling
fractal enterprise modeling
innovation
capability
low-code development
title Overcoming System Complexity using Models and Knowledge Structures. Editorial Introduction to Issue 36 of CSIMQ
title_full Overcoming System Complexity using Models and Knowledge Structures. Editorial Introduction to Issue 36 of CSIMQ
title_fullStr Overcoming System Complexity using Models and Knowledge Structures. Editorial Introduction to Issue 36 of CSIMQ
title_full_unstemmed Overcoming System Complexity using Models and Knowledge Structures. Editorial Introduction to Issue 36 of CSIMQ
title_short Overcoming System Complexity using Models and Knowledge Structures. Editorial Introduction to Issue 36 of CSIMQ
title_sort overcoming system complexity using models and knowledge structures editorial introduction to issue 36 of csimq
topic knowledge graph
design science research
agent-based model
metamodel
land use modeling
enterprise modeling
fractal enterprise modeling
innovation
capability
low-code development
url https://csimq-journals.rtu.lv/article/view/7960
work_keys_str_mv AT erikanazaruka overcomingsystemcomplexityusingmodelsandknowledgestructureseditorialintroductiontoissue36ofcsimq
AT tarmorobal overcomingsystemcomplexityusingmodelsandknowledgestructureseditorialintroductiontoissue36ofcsimq