Feedback quality and divided attention: exploring commentaries on alignment in task-oriented dialogue

While studies have shown the importance of listener feedback in dialogue, we still know little about the factors that impact its quality. Feedback can indicate either that the addressee is aligning with the speaker (i.e. ‘positive’ feedback) or that there is some communicative trouble (i.e. ‘negativ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ludivine Crible, Greta Gandolfi, Martin J. Pickering
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2024-12-01
Series:Language and Cognition
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1866980823000650/type/journal_article
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850117673106538496
author Ludivine Crible
Greta Gandolfi
Martin J. Pickering
author_facet Ludivine Crible
Greta Gandolfi
Martin J. Pickering
author_sort Ludivine Crible
collection DOAJ
description While studies have shown the importance of listener feedback in dialogue, we still know little about the factors that impact its quality. Feedback can indicate either that the addressee is aligning with the speaker (i.e. ‘positive’ feedback) or that there is some communicative trouble (i.e. ‘negative’ feedback). This study provides an in-depth account of listener feedback in task-oriented dialogue (a director–matcher game), where positive and negative feedback is produced, thus expressing both alignment and misalignment. By manipulating the listener’s cognitive load through a secondary mental task, we measure the effect of divided attention on the quantity and quality of feedback. Our quantitative analysis shows that performance and feedback quantity remain stable across cognitive load conditions, but that the timing and novelty of feedback vary: turns are produced after longer pauses when attention is divided between two speech-focused tasks, and they are more economical (i.e. include more other-repetitions) when unrelated words need to be retained in memory. These findings confirm that cognitive load impacts the quality of listener feedback. Finally, we found that positive feedback is more often generic and shorter than negative feedback and that its proportion increases over time.
format Article
id doaj-art-63d5d3ba25804cbe8461e4ad876f51ff
institution OA Journals
issn 1866-9808
1866-9859
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Language and Cognition
spelling doaj-art-63d5d3ba25804cbe8461e4ad876f51ff2025-08-20T02:36:03ZengCambridge University PressLanguage and Cognition1866-98081866-98592024-12-011689592310.1017/langcog.2023.65Feedback quality and divided attention: exploring commentaries on alignment in task-oriented dialogueLudivine Crible0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6300-2765Greta Gandolfi1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0690-4214Martin J. Pickering2Ghent University, Linguistics Department, Gent, BelgiumUniversity of Edinburgh, Psychology Department, Edinburgh, UKUniversity of Edinburgh, Psychology Department, Edinburgh, UKWhile studies have shown the importance of listener feedback in dialogue, we still know little about the factors that impact its quality. Feedback can indicate either that the addressee is aligning with the speaker (i.e. ‘positive’ feedback) or that there is some communicative trouble (i.e. ‘negative’ feedback). This study provides an in-depth account of listener feedback in task-oriented dialogue (a director–matcher game), where positive and negative feedback is produced, thus expressing both alignment and misalignment. By manipulating the listener’s cognitive load through a secondary mental task, we measure the effect of divided attention on the quantity and quality of feedback. Our quantitative analysis shows that performance and feedback quantity remain stable across cognitive load conditions, but that the timing and novelty of feedback vary: turns are produced after longer pauses when attention is divided between two speech-focused tasks, and they are more economical (i.e. include more other-repetitions) when unrelated words need to be retained in memory. These findings confirm that cognitive load impacts the quality of listener feedback. Finally, we found that positive feedback is more often generic and shorter than negative feedback and that its proportion increases over time.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1866980823000650/type/journal_articlecognitive loaddirector–matcher gamefeedbackinteractive alignmentrepetitions
spellingShingle Ludivine Crible
Greta Gandolfi
Martin J. Pickering
Feedback quality and divided attention: exploring commentaries on alignment in task-oriented dialogue
Language and Cognition
cognitive load
director–matcher game
feedback
interactive alignment
repetitions
title Feedback quality and divided attention: exploring commentaries on alignment in task-oriented dialogue
title_full Feedback quality and divided attention: exploring commentaries on alignment in task-oriented dialogue
title_fullStr Feedback quality and divided attention: exploring commentaries on alignment in task-oriented dialogue
title_full_unstemmed Feedback quality and divided attention: exploring commentaries on alignment in task-oriented dialogue
title_short Feedback quality and divided attention: exploring commentaries on alignment in task-oriented dialogue
title_sort feedback quality and divided attention exploring commentaries on alignment in task oriented dialogue
topic cognitive load
director–matcher game
feedback
interactive alignment
repetitions
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1866980823000650/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT ludivinecrible feedbackqualityanddividedattentionexploringcommentariesonalignmentintaskorienteddialogue
AT gretagandolfi feedbackqualityanddividedattentionexploringcommentariesonalignmentintaskorienteddialogue
AT martinjpickering feedbackqualityanddividedattentionexploringcommentariesonalignmentintaskorienteddialogue