Concordance between Immunohistochemistry and Microarray Gene Expression Profiling for Estrogen Receptor, Progesterone Receptor, and HER2 Receptor Statuses in Breast Cancer Patients in Lebanon

Introduction. Accurate evaluation of estrogen and progesterone receptors and HER2 is critical when diagnosing invasive breast cancer for optimal treatment. The current evaluation method is via immunohistochemistry (IHC). In this paper, we compared results of ER, PR, and HER2 from microarray gene exp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ghina B. Fakhri, Reem S. Akel, Maya K. Khalil, Deborah A. Mukherji, Fouad I. Boulos, Arafat H. Tfayli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2018-01-01
Series:International Journal of Breast Cancer
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8530318
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832552983125032960
author Ghina B. Fakhri
Reem S. Akel
Maya K. Khalil
Deborah A. Mukherji
Fouad I. Boulos
Arafat H. Tfayli
author_facet Ghina B. Fakhri
Reem S. Akel
Maya K. Khalil
Deborah A. Mukherji
Fouad I. Boulos
Arafat H. Tfayli
author_sort Ghina B. Fakhri
collection DOAJ
description Introduction. Accurate evaluation of estrogen and progesterone receptors and HER2 is critical when diagnosing invasive breast cancer for optimal treatment. The current evaluation method is via immunohistochemistry (IHC). In this paper, we compared results of ER, PR, and HER2 from microarray gene expression to IHC in 81 fresh breast cancer specimens. Methods. Gene expression profiling was performed using the GeneChip Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 arrays (Affymetrix Inc). Immunohistochemical staining for estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2 status was performed using standard methods at a CAP-accredited pathology laboratory. Concordance rates, agreement measures, and kappa scores were calculated for both methods. Results. For ER, Kappa score was 0.918 (95% CI, 0.77.3–1.000) and concordance rate was 97.5% (95% CI, 91.4%–99.7%). For PR, Kappa score was 0.652 (95% CI, 0.405–0.849) and concordance rate was 86.4% (95% CI, 77%–93%). For HER2, Kappa score was 0.709 (95% CI, 0.428–0.916) and concordance rate was 97.5% (95% CI, 91.4%–99.7%). Conclusion. Our results are in line with the available evidence with the concordance rate being the lowest for the progesterone receptor. In general, microarray gene expression and IHC proved to have high concordance rates. Several factors can increase the discordance rate such as differences in sample processing.
format Article
id doaj-art-63a90306753e4ce98b608497e7e82d2d
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-3170
2090-3189
language English
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series International Journal of Breast Cancer
spelling doaj-art-63a90306753e4ce98b608497e7e82d2d2025-02-03T05:57:12ZengWileyInternational Journal of Breast Cancer2090-31702090-31892018-01-01201810.1155/2018/85303188530318Concordance between Immunohistochemistry and Microarray Gene Expression Profiling for Estrogen Receptor, Progesterone Receptor, and HER2 Receptor Statuses in Breast Cancer Patients in LebanonGhina B. Fakhri0Reem S. Akel1Maya K. Khalil2Deborah A. Mukherji3Fouad I. Boulos4Arafat H. Tfayli5Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, LebanonDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, LebanonRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center/ State University at Buffalo-Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Elm & Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USADivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, LebanonDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, LebanonDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, LebanonIntroduction. Accurate evaluation of estrogen and progesterone receptors and HER2 is critical when diagnosing invasive breast cancer for optimal treatment. The current evaluation method is via immunohistochemistry (IHC). In this paper, we compared results of ER, PR, and HER2 from microarray gene expression to IHC in 81 fresh breast cancer specimens. Methods. Gene expression profiling was performed using the GeneChip Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 arrays (Affymetrix Inc). Immunohistochemical staining for estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2 status was performed using standard methods at a CAP-accredited pathology laboratory. Concordance rates, agreement measures, and kappa scores were calculated for both methods. Results. For ER, Kappa score was 0.918 (95% CI, 0.77.3–1.000) and concordance rate was 97.5% (95% CI, 91.4%–99.7%). For PR, Kappa score was 0.652 (95% CI, 0.405–0.849) and concordance rate was 86.4% (95% CI, 77%–93%). For HER2, Kappa score was 0.709 (95% CI, 0.428–0.916) and concordance rate was 97.5% (95% CI, 91.4%–99.7%). Conclusion. Our results are in line with the available evidence with the concordance rate being the lowest for the progesterone receptor. In general, microarray gene expression and IHC proved to have high concordance rates. Several factors can increase the discordance rate such as differences in sample processing.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8530318
spellingShingle Ghina B. Fakhri
Reem S. Akel
Maya K. Khalil
Deborah A. Mukherji
Fouad I. Boulos
Arafat H. Tfayli
Concordance between Immunohistochemistry and Microarray Gene Expression Profiling for Estrogen Receptor, Progesterone Receptor, and HER2 Receptor Statuses in Breast Cancer Patients in Lebanon
International Journal of Breast Cancer
title Concordance between Immunohistochemistry and Microarray Gene Expression Profiling for Estrogen Receptor, Progesterone Receptor, and HER2 Receptor Statuses in Breast Cancer Patients in Lebanon
title_full Concordance between Immunohistochemistry and Microarray Gene Expression Profiling for Estrogen Receptor, Progesterone Receptor, and HER2 Receptor Statuses in Breast Cancer Patients in Lebanon
title_fullStr Concordance between Immunohistochemistry and Microarray Gene Expression Profiling for Estrogen Receptor, Progesterone Receptor, and HER2 Receptor Statuses in Breast Cancer Patients in Lebanon
title_full_unstemmed Concordance between Immunohistochemistry and Microarray Gene Expression Profiling for Estrogen Receptor, Progesterone Receptor, and HER2 Receptor Statuses in Breast Cancer Patients in Lebanon
title_short Concordance between Immunohistochemistry and Microarray Gene Expression Profiling for Estrogen Receptor, Progesterone Receptor, and HER2 Receptor Statuses in Breast Cancer Patients in Lebanon
title_sort concordance between immunohistochemistry and microarray gene expression profiling for estrogen receptor progesterone receptor and her2 receptor statuses in breast cancer patients in lebanon
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8530318
work_keys_str_mv AT ghinabfakhri concordancebetweenimmunohistochemistryandmicroarraygeneexpressionprofilingforestrogenreceptorprogesteronereceptorandher2receptorstatusesinbreastcancerpatientsinlebanon
AT reemsakel concordancebetweenimmunohistochemistryandmicroarraygeneexpressionprofilingforestrogenreceptorprogesteronereceptorandher2receptorstatusesinbreastcancerpatientsinlebanon
AT mayakkhalil concordancebetweenimmunohistochemistryandmicroarraygeneexpressionprofilingforestrogenreceptorprogesteronereceptorandher2receptorstatusesinbreastcancerpatientsinlebanon
AT deborahamukherji concordancebetweenimmunohistochemistryandmicroarraygeneexpressionprofilingforestrogenreceptorprogesteronereceptorandher2receptorstatusesinbreastcancerpatientsinlebanon
AT fouadiboulos concordancebetweenimmunohistochemistryandmicroarraygeneexpressionprofilingforestrogenreceptorprogesteronereceptorandher2receptorstatusesinbreastcancerpatientsinlebanon
AT arafathtfayli concordancebetweenimmunohistochemistryandmicroarraygeneexpressionprofilingforestrogenreceptorprogesteronereceptorandher2receptorstatusesinbreastcancerpatientsinlebanon