Separation of Antibiotics Using Two Commercial Nanofiltration Membranes—Experimental Study and Modelling

The widespread use of antimicrobial drugs has contributed to the increasing trace levels of contaminants in the environment, posing an environmental problem and a challenge to modern-day medicine seeking advanced solutions. Nanofiltration is one such breakthrough solution for the selective removal o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Obinna Anike, Jiří Cuhorka, Nkechi Ezeogu, Petr Mikulášek
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-11-01
Series:Membranes
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0375/14/12/248
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850240647006519296
author Obinna Anike
Jiří Cuhorka
Nkechi Ezeogu
Petr Mikulášek
author_facet Obinna Anike
Jiří Cuhorka
Nkechi Ezeogu
Petr Mikulášek
author_sort Obinna Anike
collection DOAJ
description The widespread use of antimicrobial drugs has contributed to the increasing trace levels of contaminants in the environment, posing an environmental problem and a challenge to modern-day medicine seeking advanced solutions. Nanofiltration is one such breakthrough solution for the selective removal of antibiotics from wastewater due to their high efficiency, scalability, and versatility. This study examines the separation of antibiotics (sulfamethoxazole (SMX), trimethoprim (TMP), and metformin (MET), respectively) using commercially available membranes with an emphasis on AFC membranes (AFC 30 and AFC 80). Thus, we evaluate their efficacy, performance, and applicability in wastewater treatment processes. The data for characterizing the structural parameters of the NF membranes were determined from an uncharged organic solute rejection experiment, and the effect of various operating conditions on the retention of solutes was evaluated. All experimental data were collected using a laboratory-scale nanofiltration unit and HPLC, and rejection percentages were determined using analytical measurements. The results obtained allowed for the determination of the radius of the membrane pores using the Steric Hindrance Pore (SHP) model, resulting in values of 0.353 and 0.268 nm for the AFC 30 and AFC 80 membranes, respectively. Additionally, higher transmembrane pressure and feed flow were observed to lead to an increased rejection of antibiotics. AFC 30 demonstrated a rejection of 94% for SMX, 87% for TMP, and 87% for MET, while AFC 80 exhibited a rejection of 99.5% for SMX, 97.5% for TMP, and 98% for MET. The sieving effect appears to be the primary separation mechanism for AFC 30, as lower feed-flow rates were observed to intensify concentration polarization, thereby compromising rejection efficiency. On the contrary, AFC 80 experienced less concentration polarization due to its smaller pore sizes, effectively preventing pore clogging. Membrane performance was evaluated using the Spiegler–Kedem–Katchalsky model, based on irreversible thermodynamics, which effectively explained the mechanism of solute transport of antibiotics through the AFC 30 and AFC 80 membranes in the NF process.
format Article
id doaj-art-6382fc5f0e994085ad8b83b3690c2ec1
institution OA Journals
issn 2077-0375
language English
publishDate 2024-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Membranes
spelling doaj-art-6382fc5f0e994085ad8b83b3690c2ec12025-08-20T02:00:47ZengMDPI AGMembranes2077-03752024-11-01141224810.3390/membranes14120248Separation of Antibiotics Using Two Commercial Nanofiltration Membranes—Experimental Study and ModellingObinna Anike0Jiří Cuhorka1Nkechi Ezeogu2Petr Mikulášek3Institute of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Chemical Technology, University of Pardubice, Studentská 573, 532 10 Pardubice, Czech RepublicInstitute of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Chemical Technology, University of Pardubice, Studentská 573, 532 10 Pardubice, Czech RepublicInstitute of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Chemical Technology, University of Pardubice, Studentská 573, 532 10 Pardubice, Czech RepublicInstitute of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Chemical Technology, University of Pardubice, Studentská 573, 532 10 Pardubice, Czech RepublicThe widespread use of antimicrobial drugs has contributed to the increasing trace levels of contaminants in the environment, posing an environmental problem and a challenge to modern-day medicine seeking advanced solutions. Nanofiltration is one such breakthrough solution for the selective removal of antibiotics from wastewater due to their high efficiency, scalability, and versatility. This study examines the separation of antibiotics (sulfamethoxazole (SMX), trimethoprim (TMP), and metformin (MET), respectively) using commercially available membranes with an emphasis on AFC membranes (AFC 30 and AFC 80). Thus, we evaluate their efficacy, performance, and applicability in wastewater treatment processes. The data for characterizing the structural parameters of the NF membranes were determined from an uncharged organic solute rejection experiment, and the effect of various operating conditions on the retention of solutes was evaluated. All experimental data were collected using a laboratory-scale nanofiltration unit and HPLC, and rejection percentages were determined using analytical measurements. The results obtained allowed for the determination of the radius of the membrane pores using the Steric Hindrance Pore (SHP) model, resulting in values of 0.353 and 0.268 nm for the AFC 30 and AFC 80 membranes, respectively. Additionally, higher transmembrane pressure and feed flow were observed to lead to an increased rejection of antibiotics. AFC 30 demonstrated a rejection of 94% for SMX, 87% for TMP, and 87% for MET, while AFC 80 exhibited a rejection of 99.5% for SMX, 97.5% for TMP, and 98% for MET. The sieving effect appears to be the primary separation mechanism for AFC 30, as lower feed-flow rates were observed to intensify concentration polarization, thereby compromising rejection efficiency. On the contrary, AFC 80 experienced less concentration polarization due to its smaller pore sizes, effectively preventing pore clogging. Membrane performance was evaluated using the Spiegler–Kedem–Katchalsky model, based on irreversible thermodynamics, which effectively explained the mechanism of solute transport of antibiotics through the AFC 30 and AFC 80 membranes in the NF process.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0375/14/12/248nanofiltrationrejectionantibioticsSHP modelSpiegler–Kedem model
spellingShingle Obinna Anike
Jiří Cuhorka
Nkechi Ezeogu
Petr Mikulášek
Separation of Antibiotics Using Two Commercial Nanofiltration Membranes—Experimental Study and Modelling
Membranes
nanofiltration
rejection
antibiotics
SHP model
Spiegler–Kedem model
title Separation of Antibiotics Using Two Commercial Nanofiltration Membranes—Experimental Study and Modelling
title_full Separation of Antibiotics Using Two Commercial Nanofiltration Membranes—Experimental Study and Modelling
title_fullStr Separation of Antibiotics Using Two Commercial Nanofiltration Membranes—Experimental Study and Modelling
title_full_unstemmed Separation of Antibiotics Using Two Commercial Nanofiltration Membranes—Experimental Study and Modelling
title_short Separation of Antibiotics Using Two Commercial Nanofiltration Membranes—Experimental Study and Modelling
title_sort separation of antibiotics using two commercial nanofiltration membranes experimental study and modelling
topic nanofiltration
rejection
antibiotics
SHP model
Spiegler–Kedem model
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0375/14/12/248
work_keys_str_mv AT obinnaanike separationofantibioticsusingtwocommercialnanofiltrationmembranesexperimentalstudyandmodelling
AT jiricuhorka separationofantibioticsusingtwocommercialnanofiltrationmembranesexperimentalstudyandmodelling
AT nkechiezeogu separationofantibioticsusingtwocommercialnanofiltrationmembranesexperimentalstudyandmodelling
AT petrmikulasek separationofantibioticsusingtwocommercialnanofiltrationmembranesexperimentalstudyandmodelling