The Impact of Applying Black Hole–Host Galaxy Scaling Relations to Large Galaxy Populations
Supermassive black holes (SMBHs) with dynamically measured masses have shown empirical correlations with host galaxy properties. These correlations are often the only method available to estimate SMBH masses and gather statistics for large galaxy populations across a range of redshifts, even though...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
IOP Publishing
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | The Astrophysical Journal |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ade30a |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849318451957465088 |
|---|---|
| author | Maggie C. Huber Joseph Simon Julia M. Comerford |
| author_facet | Maggie C. Huber Joseph Simon Julia M. Comerford |
| author_sort | Maggie C. Huber |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Supermassive black holes (SMBHs) with dynamically measured masses have shown empirical correlations with host galaxy properties. These correlations are often the only method available to estimate SMBH masses and gather statistics for large galaxy populations across a range of redshifts, even though the scaling relations themselves are derived from a small subset of nearby galaxies. Depending on the scaling relation used, estimated SMBH masses can vary significantly. The most widely used scaling relations are the M _BH – M _bulge and M _BH – σ relations, where M _bulge is galaxy bulge mass and σ is the bulge velocity dispersion. In this paper, we determine how severely the choice of scaling relation impacts SMBH mass estimates for different subsets of a large galaxy population. For this analysis, we use a sample of ∼400,000 galaxies, including 1240 Type 1 active galactic nuclei from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. We calculate SMBH masses from M _BH – M _bulge and M _BH – σ and compare to single-epoch virial SMBH masses from broad-line H β , which are derived independently of black hole–host galaxy scaling relations. We find that SMBH masses derived from the single-epoch virial relation for H β are better reproduced by M _BH – σ than M _BH – M _bulge . Finally, in cases where σ and M _bulge cannot be measured directly, we show that it is possible to infer σ from photometry with more accuracy than we can infer M _bulge . |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-635809b9b6b94a9daa67a9a43afbdc72 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1538-4357 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
| publisher | IOP Publishing |
| record_format | Article |
| series | The Astrophysical Journal |
| spelling | doaj-art-635809b9b6b94a9daa67a9a43afbdc722025-08-20T03:50:49ZengIOP PublishingThe Astrophysical Journal1538-43572025-01-0198819010.3847/1538-4357/ade30aThe Impact of Applying Black Hole–Host Galaxy Scaling Relations to Large Galaxy PopulationsMaggie C. Huber0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7829-4764Joseph Simon1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1407-6607Julia M. Comerford2https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8627-4907University of Colorado Boulder , Boulder, CO 80309, USA ; margaret.huber@colorado.eduUniversity of Colorado Boulder , Boulder, CO 80309, USA ; margaret.huber@colorado.eduUniversity of Colorado Boulder , Boulder, CO 80309, USA ; margaret.huber@colorado.eduSupermassive black holes (SMBHs) with dynamically measured masses have shown empirical correlations with host galaxy properties. These correlations are often the only method available to estimate SMBH masses and gather statistics for large galaxy populations across a range of redshifts, even though the scaling relations themselves are derived from a small subset of nearby galaxies. Depending on the scaling relation used, estimated SMBH masses can vary significantly. The most widely used scaling relations are the M _BH – M _bulge and M _BH – σ relations, where M _bulge is galaxy bulge mass and σ is the bulge velocity dispersion. In this paper, we determine how severely the choice of scaling relation impacts SMBH mass estimates for different subsets of a large galaxy population. For this analysis, we use a sample of ∼400,000 galaxies, including 1240 Type 1 active galactic nuclei from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. We calculate SMBH masses from M _BH – M _bulge and M _BH – σ and compare to single-epoch virial SMBH masses from broad-line H β , which are derived independently of black hole–host galaxy scaling relations. We find that SMBH masses derived from the single-epoch virial relation for H β are better reproduced by M _BH – σ than M _BH – M _bulge . Finally, in cases where σ and M _bulge cannot be measured directly, we show that it is possible to infer σ from photometry with more accuracy than we can infer M _bulge .https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ade30aActive galaxiesGalaxiesSupermassive black holes |
| spellingShingle | Maggie C. Huber Joseph Simon Julia M. Comerford The Impact of Applying Black Hole–Host Galaxy Scaling Relations to Large Galaxy Populations The Astrophysical Journal Active galaxies Galaxies Supermassive black holes |
| title | The Impact of Applying Black Hole–Host Galaxy Scaling Relations to Large Galaxy Populations |
| title_full | The Impact of Applying Black Hole–Host Galaxy Scaling Relations to Large Galaxy Populations |
| title_fullStr | The Impact of Applying Black Hole–Host Galaxy Scaling Relations to Large Galaxy Populations |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Impact of Applying Black Hole–Host Galaxy Scaling Relations to Large Galaxy Populations |
| title_short | The Impact of Applying Black Hole–Host Galaxy Scaling Relations to Large Galaxy Populations |
| title_sort | impact of applying black hole host galaxy scaling relations to large galaxy populations |
| topic | Active galaxies Galaxies Supermassive black holes |
| url | https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ade30a |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT maggiechuber theimpactofapplyingblackholehostgalaxyscalingrelationstolargegalaxypopulations AT josephsimon theimpactofapplyingblackholehostgalaxyscalingrelationstolargegalaxypopulations AT juliamcomerford theimpactofapplyingblackholehostgalaxyscalingrelationstolargegalaxypopulations AT maggiechuber impactofapplyingblackholehostgalaxyscalingrelationstolargegalaxypopulations AT josephsimon impactofapplyingblackholehostgalaxyscalingrelationstolargegalaxypopulations AT juliamcomerford impactofapplyingblackholehostgalaxyscalingrelationstolargegalaxypopulations |