Dimensional Variations of Left-Sided Double-Lumen Endobronchial Tubes

Background. Tube size selection is critical in ventilating patients’ lungs using double-lumen endobronchial tubes (DLTs). Little information about relevant parameters is readily available from manufacturers. The aim of this study is to provide reference data for relevant dimensions of conventionally...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Niels Hegland, Sebastian Schnitzler, Jan Ellensohn, Marc P. Steurer, Markus Weiss, Alexander Dullenkopf
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-01-01
Series:Anesthesiology Research and Practice
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3634202
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850120958779588608
author Niels Hegland
Sebastian Schnitzler
Jan Ellensohn
Marc P. Steurer
Markus Weiss
Alexander Dullenkopf
author_facet Niels Hegland
Sebastian Schnitzler
Jan Ellensohn
Marc P. Steurer
Markus Weiss
Alexander Dullenkopf
author_sort Niels Hegland
collection DOAJ
description Background. Tube size selection is critical in ventilating patients’ lungs using double-lumen endobronchial tubes (DLTs). Little information about relevant parameters is readily available from manufacturers. The aim of this study is to provide reference data for relevant dimensions of conventionally available DLTs. Methods. In this study in a benchmark in vitro setup, several dimensional parameters of four sizes of left-sided double-lumen endobronchial tubes from six different manufacturers were assessed, such as distances and diameters of tube shaft, cuff lengths, and diameters as well the angle at the tip. Results. Endobronchial tubes of ostensibly the same size revealed wide variation in measured parameters between brands from different manufacturers. In some parameters, there was an overlap between different sizes from the same manufacturer, i.e., diameters and distances did not increase with increasing nominal endobronchial tube size. The information about dimensions of endobronchial tubes provided by manufacturers’ leaflets is insufficient. Conclusions. Endobronchial tube size selection carries unnecessary uncertainty because clinically relevant parameters are unknown and vary considerably between different manufacturers.
format Article
id doaj-art-6339823832d04f00a281b8a32c668178
institution OA Journals
issn 1687-6962
1687-6970
language English
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Anesthesiology Research and Practice
spelling doaj-art-6339823832d04f00a281b8a32c6681782025-08-20T02:35:15ZengWileyAnesthesiology Research and Practice1687-69621687-69702019-01-01201910.1155/2019/36342023634202Dimensional Variations of Left-Sided Double-Lumen Endobronchial TubesNiels Hegland0Sebastian Schnitzler1Jan Ellensohn2Marc P. Steurer3Markus Weiss4Alexander Dullenkopf5Institute for Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Spital Thurgau AG, Frauenfeld, SwitzerlandInstitute for Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Spital Thurgau AG, Frauenfeld, SwitzerlandInstitute for Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Spital Thurgau AG, Frauenfeld, SwitzerlandDepartment of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco, USADepartment of Anesthesia and Children’s Research Centre, University Children’s Hospital, Zurich, SwitzerlandInstitute for Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Spital Thurgau AG, Frauenfeld, SwitzerlandBackground. Tube size selection is critical in ventilating patients’ lungs using double-lumen endobronchial tubes (DLTs). Little information about relevant parameters is readily available from manufacturers. The aim of this study is to provide reference data for relevant dimensions of conventionally available DLTs. Methods. In this study in a benchmark in vitro setup, several dimensional parameters of four sizes of left-sided double-lumen endobronchial tubes from six different manufacturers were assessed, such as distances and diameters of tube shaft, cuff lengths, and diameters as well the angle at the tip. Results. Endobronchial tubes of ostensibly the same size revealed wide variation in measured parameters between brands from different manufacturers. In some parameters, there was an overlap between different sizes from the same manufacturer, i.e., diameters and distances did not increase with increasing nominal endobronchial tube size. The information about dimensions of endobronchial tubes provided by manufacturers’ leaflets is insufficient. Conclusions. Endobronchial tube size selection carries unnecessary uncertainty because clinically relevant parameters are unknown and vary considerably between different manufacturers.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3634202
spellingShingle Niels Hegland
Sebastian Schnitzler
Jan Ellensohn
Marc P. Steurer
Markus Weiss
Alexander Dullenkopf
Dimensional Variations of Left-Sided Double-Lumen Endobronchial Tubes
Anesthesiology Research and Practice
title Dimensional Variations of Left-Sided Double-Lumen Endobronchial Tubes
title_full Dimensional Variations of Left-Sided Double-Lumen Endobronchial Tubes
title_fullStr Dimensional Variations of Left-Sided Double-Lumen Endobronchial Tubes
title_full_unstemmed Dimensional Variations of Left-Sided Double-Lumen Endobronchial Tubes
title_short Dimensional Variations of Left-Sided Double-Lumen Endobronchial Tubes
title_sort dimensional variations of left sided double lumen endobronchial tubes
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3634202
work_keys_str_mv AT nielshegland dimensionalvariationsofleftsideddoublelumenendobronchialtubes
AT sebastianschnitzler dimensionalvariationsofleftsideddoublelumenendobronchialtubes
AT janellensohn dimensionalvariationsofleftsideddoublelumenendobronchialtubes
AT marcpsteurer dimensionalvariationsofleftsideddoublelumenendobronchialtubes
AT markusweiss dimensionalvariationsofleftsideddoublelumenendobronchialtubes
AT alexanderdullenkopf dimensionalvariationsofleftsideddoublelumenendobronchialtubes