Use of metallic ureteric stents for chronic ureteric obstruction and its association with value-based care

Introduction: We aimed to compare the real-world data and our clinical experience with metallic stents (MSs) and conventional polymeric stents (PSs) in the management of both malignant and benign chronic ureteric obstruction (CUO), in terms of clinical outcomes and costs. Methods: Clinical data from...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yu Xi Terence Law, Ang Zhou, David Terrence Consigliere, Benjamin Yen Seow Goh, Ho Yee Tiong
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer – Medknow Publications 2025-01-01
Series:Singapore Medical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2021-418
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823861470796972032
author Yu Xi Terence Law
Ang Zhou
David Terrence Consigliere
Benjamin Yen Seow Goh
Ho Yee Tiong
author_facet Yu Xi Terence Law
Ang Zhou
David Terrence Consigliere
Benjamin Yen Seow Goh
Ho Yee Tiong
author_sort Yu Xi Terence Law
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: We aimed to compare the real-world data and our clinical experience with metallic stents (MSs) and conventional polymeric stents (PSs) in the management of both malignant and benign chronic ureteric obstruction (CUO), in terms of clinical outcomes and costs. Methods: Clinical data from our institution, including outcomes for all ureteric stents inserted for long-term management of CUO from all causes from 2014 to 2017, were retrospectively reviewed and compared between the MS and PS episodes. Results: A total of 247 stents were placed in 63 patients with CUO over the 4-year study period. Of these, 45 stents were MSs. There was no significant difference in all baseline characteristics between the MS and PS groups, except for the aetiology of obstructive cause. Mean indwelling stent duration was significantly greater for MS than for PS (228.6 ± 147.0 vs. 146.1 ± 66.0 days, P < 0.001), thereby leading to lower average number of stent changes per year in the MS group compared to the PS group (1.4 vs. 6.3 times, respectively). Despite the higher unit cost of MS compared to PS, there was no significant mean cost difference overall (cost per dwelling day SGD 7.82 ± SGD 10.44 vs. SGD 8.23 ± SGD 20.50, P = 0.888). Conclusion: Resonance MS is a better option than PS to manage CUO from malignant and benign causes because its significantly longer indwelling time mitigates the higher unit cost of the stent. It potentially reduces the number of procedures and operations in patients. Thus, it should be considered for all patients with CUO requiring long-term ureteric drainage.
format Article
id doaj-art-6330cb093bdc445e8019c63a2681330a
institution Kabale University
issn 0037-5675
2737-5935
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer – Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Singapore Medical Journal
spelling doaj-art-6330cb093bdc445e8019c63a2681330a2025-02-09T13:06:24ZengWolters Kluwer – Medknow PublicationsSingapore Medical Journal0037-56752737-59352025-01-01661283210.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2021-418Use of metallic ureteric stents for chronic ureteric obstruction and its association with value-based careYu Xi Terence LawAng ZhouDavid Terrence ConsigliereBenjamin Yen Seow GohHo Yee TiongIntroduction: We aimed to compare the real-world data and our clinical experience with metallic stents (MSs) and conventional polymeric stents (PSs) in the management of both malignant and benign chronic ureteric obstruction (CUO), in terms of clinical outcomes and costs. Methods: Clinical data from our institution, including outcomes for all ureteric stents inserted for long-term management of CUO from all causes from 2014 to 2017, were retrospectively reviewed and compared between the MS and PS episodes. Results: A total of 247 stents were placed in 63 patients with CUO over the 4-year study period. Of these, 45 stents were MSs. There was no significant difference in all baseline characteristics between the MS and PS groups, except for the aetiology of obstructive cause. Mean indwelling stent duration was significantly greater for MS than for PS (228.6 ± 147.0 vs. 146.1 ± 66.0 days, P < 0.001), thereby leading to lower average number of stent changes per year in the MS group compared to the PS group (1.4 vs. 6.3 times, respectively). Despite the higher unit cost of MS compared to PS, there was no significant mean cost difference overall (cost per dwelling day SGD 7.82 ± SGD 10.44 vs. SGD 8.23 ± SGD 20.50, P = 0.888). Conclusion: Resonance MS is a better option than PS to manage CUO from malignant and benign causes because its significantly longer indwelling time mitigates the higher unit cost of the stent. It potentially reduces the number of procedures and operations in patients. Thus, it should be considered for all patients with CUO requiring long-term ureteric drainage.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2021-418chronic ureteric obstructioncost analysismetallic stentpolymer stentvalue based
spellingShingle Yu Xi Terence Law
Ang Zhou
David Terrence Consigliere
Benjamin Yen Seow Goh
Ho Yee Tiong
Use of metallic ureteric stents for chronic ureteric obstruction and its association with value-based care
Singapore Medical Journal
chronic ureteric obstruction
cost analysis
metallic stent
polymer stent
value based
title Use of metallic ureteric stents for chronic ureteric obstruction and its association with value-based care
title_full Use of metallic ureteric stents for chronic ureteric obstruction and its association with value-based care
title_fullStr Use of metallic ureteric stents for chronic ureteric obstruction and its association with value-based care
title_full_unstemmed Use of metallic ureteric stents for chronic ureteric obstruction and its association with value-based care
title_short Use of metallic ureteric stents for chronic ureteric obstruction and its association with value-based care
title_sort use of metallic ureteric stents for chronic ureteric obstruction and its association with value based care
topic chronic ureteric obstruction
cost analysis
metallic stent
polymer stent
value based
url https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2021-418
work_keys_str_mv AT yuxiterencelaw useofmetallicuretericstentsforchronicuretericobstructionanditsassociationwithvaluebasedcare
AT angzhou useofmetallicuretericstentsforchronicuretericobstructionanditsassociationwithvaluebasedcare
AT davidterrenceconsigliere useofmetallicuretericstentsforchronicuretericobstructionanditsassociationwithvaluebasedcare
AT benjaminyenseowgoh useofmetallicuretericstentsforchronicuretericobstructionanditsassociationwithvaluebasedcare
AT hoyeetiong useofmetallicuretericstentsforchronicuretericobstructionanditsassociationwithvaluebasedcare