RSE et théorie des parties prenantes : les impasses du contrat
The paper examines stakeholder theory and what it means for CSR research and practices. First, some theoretical and conceptual weaknesses are pinpointed. Then I underline how stakeholder theory is rooted in contractarianism: the firm is viewed as a nexus of contracts between stakeholders, in the lin...
Saved in:
Main Author: | Didier Cazal |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Association Recherche & Régulation
2011-06-01
|
Series: | Revue de la Régulation |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/regulation/9173 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Polanyi contre Freeman
by: Nicolas Postel, et al.
Published: (2011-06-01) -
Le Bilan Sociétal© : de la prise en compte des intérêts contradictoires des parties prenantes à la responsabilité sociétale
by: Catherine Bodet, et al.
Published: (2006-01-01) -
The role of corporate social responsibility in modern economic theory and activities of multinational enterprises
by: E. L. Pavlov
Published: (2019-09-01) -
Le défi de l’appropriation de la responsabilité sociale des entreprises (RSE) par des syndicats nationaux : les leçons de la Coalition québécoise contre les ateliers de misère (CQCAM)
by: Emmanuelle Champion
Published: (2018-07-01) -
Study on Professors’ Perception With Respect to Higher Education Institutions’ Socially Responsible Initiatives
by: Adriano Stadler, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01)