RSE et théorie des parties prenantes : les impasses du contrat

The paper examines stakeholder theory and what it means for CSR research and practices. First, some theoretical and conceptual weaknesses are pinpointed. Then I underline how stakeholder theory is rooted in contractarianism: the firm is viewed as a nexus of contracts between stakeholders, in the lin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Didier Cazal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Association Recherche & Régulation 2011-06-01
Series:Revue de la Régulation
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/regulation/9173
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832577960552431616
author Didier Cazal
author_facet Didier Cazal
author_sort Didier Cazal
collection DOAJ
description The paper examines stakeholder theory and what it means for CSR research and practices. First, some theoretical and conceptual weaknesses are pinpointed. Then I underline how stakeholder theory is rooted in contractarianism: the firm is viewed as a nexus of contracts between stakeholders, in the line of transactions costs theory, its philosophical foundations are inspired from social theories of social contract and justice as fairness, as they were especially developed by Rawls. I show the conceptual problems inherited from such contractarian views and finally examine the likely sociopolitical consequences of these views. Grounding CSR in stakeholder theory may well result in some extended free-market liberalism and in voluntarism regarding CSR matters and eventually in limited ethical version of an unbridled capitalism.
format Article
id doaj-art-62f4d4dc4e6f47939b885a48c722236b
institution Kabale University
issn 1957-7796
language English
publishDate 2011-06-01
publisher Association Recherche & Régulation
record_format Article
series Revue de la Régulation
spelling doaj-art-62f4d4dc4e6f47939b885a48c722236b2025-01-30T14:26:20ZengAssociation Recherche & RégulationRevue de la Régulation1957-77962011-06-01910.4000/regulation.9173RSE et théorie des parties prenantes : les impasses du contratDidier CazalThe paper examines stakeholder theory and what it means for CSR research and practices. First, some theoretical and conceptual weaknesses are pinpointed. Then I underline how stakeholder theory is rooted in contractarianism: the firm is viewed as a nexus of contracts between stakeholders, in the line of transactions costs theory, its philosophical foundations are inspired from social theories of social contract and justice as fairness, as they were especially developed by Rawls. I show the conceptual problems inherited from such contractarian views and finally examine the likely sociopolitical consequences of these views. Grounding CSR in stakeholder theory may well result in some extended free-market liberalism and in voluntarism regarding CSR matters and eventually in limited ethical version of an unbridled capitalism.https://journals.openedition.org/regulation/9173Corporate social responsibilitystakeholder theoryFreemancontractarianism
spellingShingle Didier Cazal
RSE et théorie des parties prenantes : les impasses du contrat
Revue de la Régulation
Corporate social responsibility
stakeholder theory
Freeman
contractarianism
title RSE et théorie des parties prenantes : les impasses du contrat
title_full RSE et théorie des parties prenantes : les impasses du contrat
title_fullStr RSE et théorie des parties prenantes : les impasses du contrat
title_full_unstemmed RSE et théorie des parties prenantes : les impasses du contrat
title_short RSE et théorie des parties prenantes : les impasses du contrat
title_sort rse et theorie des parties prenantes les impasses du contrat
topic Corporate social responsibility
stakeholder theory
Freeman
contractarianism
url https://journals.openedition.org/regulation/9173
work_keys_str_mv AT didiercazal rseettheoriedespartiesprenanteslesimpassesducontrat