Les transformations d'un mythe d'origine L'exemple de Gengis Khan et de Tamerlan

The representation of Chinggis Khan, the great conqueror and founder of a dynasty is closely related to that of the mythical hero. His life is marked by many signs, characteristic of an uncommon destiny. In particular, his birth is presented as a miraculous event though its story has been changed in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Denise Aigle
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Université de Provence 2000-07-01
Series:Revue des Mondes Musulmans et de la Méditerranée
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/remmm/277
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841552079096643584
author Denise Aigle
author_facet Denise Aigle
author_sort Denise Aigle
collection DOAJ
description The representation of Chinggis Khan, the great conqueror and founder of a dynasty is closely related to that of the mythical hero. His life is marked by many signs, characteristic of an uncommon destiny. In particular, his birth is presented as a miraculous event though its story has been changed in the course of time as his descendants and later his epigones drifted away from Shamanist Mongol origins. The story of Chinggis Khan's birth is first related to the Mongol myth of origins according to which the Mongols descend from « Blue-Wolf and " Fawn-Doe ", this story itself being evidently inspired by the Turkish myth. The Secret History of the Mongols, written some time after Chinggis Khan's death, suggests that his ancestor, the widow Alan-Qo'a, had been fertilised by a creature who « crept like a yellow dog ». Such a part played by an animal is in accordance with the fact that shamanism is based on a system of interrelations between the animal and human worlds. Some decades later, Rashid al-din'sJâmi' al-tawârikhtakes the same legend up again, but mentions only a « fawn creature ». Later, animal connections completely disappear in a Muslim context totally detached from shamanist references. In the first half of the 15th century, the inscriptions copied in the mausoleum of Tamerlane mention a luminous ray manifested under the shape of an « accomplished mortal being », descendant of 'All. Lastly, in Moghul India, Chinggis Khan is explicitly related to Jesus when the author of the Akbar-näma writes that his ancestor got pregnant in the same way as Maryam did.
format Article
id doaj-art-62e60f7a705144a08ad438222a8da4f8
institution Kabale University
issn 0997-1327
2105-2271
language English
publishDate 2000-07-01
publisher Université de Provence
record_format Article
series Revue des Mondes Musulmans et de la Méditerranée
spelling doaj-art-62e60f7a705144a08ad438222a8da4f82025-01-09T13:24:01ZengUniversité de ProvenceRevue des Mondes Musulmans et de la Méditerranée0997-13272105-22712000-07-018915116810.4000/remmm.277Les transformations d'un mythe d'origine L'exemple de Gengis Khan et de TamerlanDenise AigleThe representation of Chinggis Khan, the great conqueror and founder of a dynasty is closely related to that of the mythical hero. His life is marked by many signs, characteristic of an uncommon destiny. In particular, his birth is presented as a miraculous event though its story has been changed in the course of time as his descendants and later his epigones drifted away from Shamanist Mongol origins. The story of Chinggis Khan's birth is first related to the Mongol myth of origins according to which the Mongols descend from « Blue-Wolf and " Fawn-Doe ", this story itself being evidently inspired by the Turkish myth. The Secret History of the Mongols, written some time after Chinggis Khan's death, suggests that his ancestor, the widow Alan-Qo'a, had been fertilised by a creature who « crept like a yellow dog ». Such a part played by an animal is in accordance with the fact that shamanism is based on a system of interrelations between the animal and human worlds. Some decades later, Rashid al-din'sJâmi' al-tawârikhtakes the same legend up again, but mentions only a « fawn creature ». Later, animal connections completely disappear in a Muslim context totally detached from shamanist references. In the first half of the 15th century, the inscriptions copied in the mausoleum of Tamerlane mention a luminous ray manifested under the shape of an « accomplished mortal being », descendant of 'All. Lastly, in Moghul India, Chinggis Khan is explicitly related to Jesus when the author of the Akbar-näma writes that his ancestor got pregnant in the same way as Maryam did.https://journals.openedition.org/remmm/277
spellingShingle Denise Aigle
Les transformations d'un mythe d'origine L'exemple de Gengis Khan et de Tamerlan
Revue des Mondes Musulmans et de la Méditerranée
title Les transformations d'un mythe d'origine L'exemple de Gengis Khan et de Tamerlan
title_full Les transformations d'un mythe d'origine L'exemple de Gengis Khan et de Tamerlan
title_fullStr Les transformations d'un mythe d'origine L'exemple de Gengis Khan et de Tamerlan
title_full_unstemmed Les transformations d'un mythe d'origine L'exemple de Gengis Khan et de Tamerlan
title_short Les transformations d'un mythe d'origine L'exemple de Gengis Khan et de Tamerlan
title_sort les transformations d un mythe d origine l exemple de gengis khan et de tamerlan
url https://journals.openedition.org/remmm/277
work_keys_str_mv AT deniseaigle lestransformationsdunmythedoriginelexempledegengiskhanetdetamerlan