Early Detection of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: Bedside Tools

Abstract Introduction In addition to the presence of consolidation in the chest radiography (CXR) or computerized tomography (CT) scan; a group of clinical symptoms and signs are needed for the diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Some limitations for the use of CXR and CT in intensiv...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sayed Gaber, Osama Tayeh, Khaled A. Wahab, Nader Mohamed, Tarek Essawy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer 2021-01-01
Series:Egyptian Journal of Critical Care Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1097/EJ9.0000000000000015
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849766801494245376
author Sayed Gaber
Osama Tayeh
Khaled A. Wahab
Nader Mohamed
Tarek Essawy
author_facet Sayed Gaber
Osama Tayeh
Khaled A. Wahab
Nader Mohamed
Tarek Essawy
author_sort Sayed Gaber
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Introduction In addition to the presence of consolidation in the chest radiography (CXR) or computerized tomography (CT) scan; a group of clinical symptoms and signs are needed for the diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Some limitations for the use of CXR and CT in intensive care unit (ICU) exist. The use of ultrasound imaging in ICU as a part of patient assessment is attaining more interest. Aim of the work To assess the value of lung ultrasound in comparison to chest X-ray and clinical pulmonary infection score (CPIS) as bedside tools in the diagnosis of VAP in critically ill patients while taking the CT scan as a reference. Methods Our study included 80 mechanically ventilated patients in ICU. Bedside lung ultrasound, CPIS, chest X-ray, and CT scan of chest were done for all patients on mechanical ventilator 48 hours after intubation and initiation of mechanical ventilation. The patients with documented pneumonia prior to ventilation were excluded. All data were then collected and statistically analyzed. Results By using CT chest as a golden method for diagnosis of pneumonia, 24 cases were found positive for VAP. By lung ultrasound (LUS) on day 2, 22 cases were found positive for VAP with a percentage of 91.67%. By CXR only, 18 cases were found positive for VAP with a percentage of 75.83%. By CPIS score, 22 cases were found positive for VAP with a percentage of 91.67%, but there were 28 cases suggested as VAP by the score who were false positive, whereas they were negative by CT chest. LUS has a high sensitivity of 91.67% and specificity of 100%, PPV of 100%, and NPV of 96%, which is significant versus CXR (P = .001) and significant versus CPIS > 6 (P = .001). CXR showed sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 71% with PPV of 52% and NPV of 87% whereas CPIS showed sensitivity of 91.67% and specificity of 50% with positive predictive value of 44% and negative predictive value of 93.3%, and this made P value of CXR to CPIS > 6 equal to .7, which is not significant. Conclusion LUS was suggested to be superior to the bedside chest X-ray and nearly equal to chest CT in the diagnosis of VAP. Despite being preferred in the critical care settings in ICU, the final diagnosis should be given after integration of the judgments of both lungs, taking history and the clinical examination, and it is not expected to jump to the conclusion using LUS images only.
format Article
id doaj-art-62e489a1f24f4745b11888af3db1c8a3
institution DOAJ
issn 2090-7303
2090-9209
language English
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Springer
record_format Article
series Egyptian Journal of Critical Care Medicine
spelling doaj-art-62e489a1f24f4745b11888af3db1c8a32025-08-20T03:04:27ZengSpringerEgyptian Journal of Critical Care Medicine2090-73032090-92092021-01-0172-3747910.1097/EJ9.0000000000000015Early Detection of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: Bedside ToolsSayed Gaber0Osama Tayeh1Khaled A. Wahab2Nader Mohamed3Tarek Essawy4Critical Care Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo UniversityCritical Care Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo UniversityCritical Care Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo UniversityCritical Care Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo UniversityCritical Care Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo UniversityAbstract Introduction In addition to the presence of consolidation in the chest radiography (CXR) or computerized tomography (CT) scan; a group of clinical symptoms and signs are needed for the diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Some limitations for the use of CXR and CT in intensive care unit (ICU) exist. The use of ultrasound imaging in ICU as a part of patient assessment is attaining more interest. Aim of the work To assess the value of lung ultrasound in comparison to chest X-ray and clinical pulmonary infection score (CPIS) as bedside tools in the diagnosis of VAP in critically ill patients while taking the CT scan as a reference. Methods Our study included 80 mechanically ventilated patients in ICU. Bedside lung ultrasound, CPIS, chest X-ray, and CT scan of chest were done for all patients on mechanical ventilator 48 hours after intubation and initiation of mechanical ventilation. The patients with documented pneumonia prior to ventilation were excluded. All data were then collected and statistically analyzed. Results By using CT chest as a golden method for diagnosis of pneumonia, 24 cases were found positive for VAP. By lung ultrasound (LUS) on day 2, 22 cases were found positive for VAP with a percentage of 91.67%. By CXR only, 18 cases were found positive for VAP with a percentage of 75.83%. By CPIS score, 22 cases were found positive for VAP with a percentage of 91.67%, but there were 28 cases suggested as VAP by the score who were false positive, whereas they were negative by CT chest. LUS has a high sensitivity of 91.67% and specificity of 100%, PPV of 100%, and NPV of 96%, which is significant versus CXR (P = .001) and significant versus CPIS > 6 (P = .001). CXR showed sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 71% with PPV of 52% and NPV of 87% whereas CPIS showed sensitivity of 91.67% and specificity of 50% with positive predictive value of 44% and negative predictive value of 93.3%, and this made P value of CXR to CPIS > 6 equal to .7, which is not significant. Conclusion LUS was suggested to be superior to the bedside chest X-ray and nearly equal to chest CT in the diagnosis of VAP. Despite being preferred in the critical care settings in ICU, the final diagnosis should be given after integration of the judgments of both lungs, taking history and the clinical examination, and it is not expected to jump to the conclusion using LUS images only.https://doi.org/10.1097/EJ9.0000000000000015chest X-rayCT chestlung ultrasoundsputum cultureVAP
spellingShingle Sayed Gaber
Osama Tayeh
Khaled A. Wahab
Nader Mohamed
Tarek Essawy
Early Detection of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: Bedside Tools
Egyptian Journal of Critical Care Medicine
chest X-ray
CT chest
lung ultrasound
sputum culture
VAP
title Early Detection of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: Bedside Tools
title_full Early Detection of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: Bedside Tools
title_fullStr Early Detection of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: Bedside Tools
title_full_unstemmed Early Detection of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: Bedside Tools
title_short Early Detection of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: Bedside Tools
title_sort early detection of ventilator associated pneumonia bedside tools
topic chest X-ray
CT chest
lung ultrasound
sputum culture
VAP
url https://doi.org/10.1097/EJ9.0000000000000015
work_keys_str_mv AT sayedgaber earlydetectionofventilatorassociatedpneumoniabedsidetools
AT osamatayeh earlydetectionofventilatorassociatedpneumoniabedsidetools
AT khaledawahab earlydetectionofventilatorassociatedpneumoniabedsidetools
AT nadermohamed earlydetectionofventilatorassociatedpneumoniabedsidetools
AT tarekessawy earlydetectionofventilatorassociatedpneumoniabedsidetools