Freedom of Expression in South Sudanese Judicial Struggle: Bought or Fought For? With Special Reference to India

This article examines the struggle of the South Sudanese people in the courtroom for freedom of expression with special reference to India. The aim is thus to illustrate the judicial perspective on interpretation of this fundamental right from the past to the present. This evaluation in nexus to the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Varun Chhachhar, Wol Deng Akech
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universitas Negeri Semarang 2024-12-01
Series:Journal of Law and Legal Reform
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/jllr/article/view/4936
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823856665895632896
author Varun Chhachhar
Wol Deng Akech
author_facet Varun Chhachhar
Wol Deng Akech
author_sort Varun Chhachhar
collection DOAJ
description This article examines the struggle of the South Sudanese people in the courtroom for freedom of expression with special reference to India. The aim is thus to illustrate the judicial perspective on interpretation of this fundamental right from the past to the present. This evaluation in nexus to the contemporary constitutional adjudication in the world at large and South Sudan in particular tries to draw the attention of the courts in South Sudan to adopt a progressive interpretation. It also stresses focus on interpretation adopted by judges in South Sudan. The paper seeks to reckon the concerned institutions in South Sudan to the ongoing liberal jurisprudences on the right to freedom of speech and expression on one hand and on the other hand informs the concerned institutions for a serious litigation and enforcement of Bill of Rights in South Sudan. Indeed, the paper has invoked progressive interpretations of fundamental rights from the U.K, India, and the U.S to help in justifying the grounds as to why South Sudanese litigants and courts should scarcely claim and upheld freedom of expression as fundamental and foundational tenet of a democratic society. The article concludes that the sanctity of all rights will be meaningless if freedom of expression is not accorded an important status by the concerned institutions.
format Article
id doaj-art-62c99235d13d408b9475472e8e461192
institution Kabale University
issn 2715-0941
2715-0968
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Universitas Negeri Semarang
record_format Article
series Journal of Law and Legal Reform
spelling doaj-art-62c99235d13d408b9475472e8e4611922025-02-12T05:42:30ZengUniversitas Negeri SemarangJournal of Law and Legal Reform2715-09412715-09682024-12-01541575160810.15294/jllr.v5i4.49364941Freedom of Expression in South Sudanese Judicial Struggle: Bought or Fought For? With Special Reference to IndiaVarun Chhachhar0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9715-3411Wol Deng Akech1https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0194-5276Faculty of Law, University of LucknowFaculty of Economics and Business Administration, Catholic University of South SudanThis article examines the struggle of the South Sudanese people in the courtroom for freedom of expression with special reference to India. The aim is thus to illustrate the judicial perspective on interpretation of this fundamental right from the past to the present. This evaluation in nexus to the contemporary constitutional adjudication in the world at large and South Sudan in particular tries to draw the attention of the courts in South Sudan to adopt a progressive interpretation. It also stresses focus on interpretation adopted by judges in South Sudan. The paper seeks to reckon the concerned institutions in South Sudan to the ongoing liberal jurisprudences on the right to freedom of speech and expression on one hand and on the other hand informs the concerned institutions for a serious litigation and enforcement of Bill of Rights in South Sudan. Indeed, the paper has invoked progressive interpretations of fundamental rights from the U.K, India, and the U.S to help in justifying the grounds as to why South Sudanese litigants and courts should scarcely claim and upheld freedom of expression as fundamental and foundational tenet of a democratic society. The article concludes that the sanctity of all rights will be meaningless if freedom of expression is not accorded an important status by the concerned institutions.https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/jllr/article/view/4936comparative lawcomparative constitution judiciaryfreedom of speech & expression constitutional rights
spellingShingle Varun Chhachhar
Wol Deng Akech
Freedom of Expression in South Sudanese Judicial Struggle: Bought or Fought For? With Special Reference to India
Journal of Law and Legal Reform
comparative law
comparative constitution
judiciary
freedom of speech & expression
constitutional rights
title Freedom of Expression in South Sudanese Judicial Struggle: Bought or Fought For? With Special Reference to India
title_full Freedom of Expression in South Sudanese Judicial Struggle: Bought or Fought For? With Special Reference to India
title_fullStr Freedom of Expression in South Sudanese Judicial Struggle: Bought or Fought For? With Special Reference to India
title_full_unstemmed Freedom of Expression in South Sudanese Judicial Struggle: Bought or Fought For? With Special Reference to India
title_short Freedom of Expression in South Sudanese Judicial Struggle: Bought or Fought For? With Special Reference to India
title_sort freedom of expression in south sudanese judicial struggle bought or fought for with special reference to india
topic comparative law
comparative constitution
judiciary
freedom of speech & expression
constitutional rights
url https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/jllr/article/view/4936
work_keys_str_mv AT varunchhachhar freedomofexpressioninsouthsudanesejudicialstruggleboughtorfoughtforwithspecialreferencetoindia
AT woldengakech freedomofexpressioninsouthsudanesejudicialstruggleboughtorfoughtforwithspecialreferencetoindia