Assessing Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance to Flumethrin in <i>Varroa destructor</i> Populations in Muğla, Türkiye

Beekeepers use a variety of methods to control <i>Varroa destructor</i> (varroa). Chemical control relies heavily on flumethrin, amitraz, coumaphos, and tau-fluvalinate products. However, increasing colony losses in recent years have been linked to the development of resistance in varroa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ali Sorucu, Bekir Çöl, Esra Dibek, Anara Babayeva
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-05-01
Series:Insects
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4450/16/6/548
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Beekeepers use a variety of methods to control <i>Varroa destructor</i> (varroa). Chemical control relies heavily on flumethrin, amitraz, coumaphos, and tau-fluvalinate products. However, increasing colony losses in recent years have been linked to the development of resistance in varroa mites to these insecticides. Varroa mites develop mutations in the voltage-gated sodium channel (VGSC) that confer resistance to pyrethroids such as flumethrin. Specifically, researchers have identified substitutions of the leucine amino acid at VGSC L925 with isoleucine, methionine, or valine. This study investigated phenotypic and genotypic resistance to flumethrin in varroa populations in Muğla, Türkiye. LD<sub>50</sub> values (lethal dose for 50% mortality) were quantified, and PCR and sequencing were used to analyze the VGSC L925 gene region. The PCR results confirmed mutations in the target gene region in all samples. Sequencing revealed that 95% of the population carried homozygous resistant alleles, while 5% were heterozygous. At the VGSC L925 locus, leucine was replaced by isoleucine (91%), methionine (6%), and valine (3%). Phenotypic assays showed an average LD<sub>50</sub> value of 49.1 µg (range: 31–61.8 µg). Comparison of LD<sub>50</sub> between resistant and susceptible populations was not possible because no susceptible individuals were identified. Despite the resistance, mortality increased with escalating doses, suggesting that current protocols may be temporarily mitigating infestations. However, urgent dose adjustments and alternative control strategies are critical to prevent imminent colony collapse.
ISSN:2075-4450