Assessing the accuracy of the recording and reporting of malaria rapid diagnostic test results in four African countries: methods and key results

Abstract Background Rapid diagnostic test (RDT) results are the foundation of both case management and malaria surveillance across sub-Saharan Africa. However, RDT results may be misrecorded in health facility registers by healthcare workers (HCWs), either unintentionally or deliberately, for exampl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kim A. Lindblade, Arthur Mpimbaza, Corine Ngufor, William Yavo, Sunday Atobatele, Ese Akpiroroh, Abibatou Konaté-Touré, Idelphonse Ahogni, Nelson Ssewante, Bosco Agaba, Augustin Kpemasse, Jacques Agnon, Onyebuchi Okoro, Godwin Ntadom, Antoine Tanoh, Cyriaque Affoukou, Jimmy Opigo, Shawna Cooper, John J. Aponte, Kevin Griffith, Radina Soebiyanto, Michael Humes
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-07-01
Series:Malaria Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-025-05459-7
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849402979280486400
author Kim A. Lindblade
Arthur Mpimbaza
Corine Ngufor
William Yavo
Sunday Atobatele
Ese Akpiroroh
Abibatou Konaté-Touré
Idelphonse Ahogni
Nelson Ssewante
Bosco Agaba
Augustin Kpemasse
Jacques Agnon
Onyebuchi Okoro
Godwin Ntadom
Antoine Tanoh
Cyriaque Affoukou
Jimmy Opigo
Shawna Cooper
John J. Aponte
Kevin Griffith
Radina Soebiyanto
Michael Humes
author_facet Kim A. Lindblade
Arthur Mpimbaza
Corine Ngufor
William Yavo
Sunday Atobatele
Ese Akpiroroh
Abibatou Konaté-Touré
Idelphonse Ahogni
Nelson Ssewante
Bosco Agaba
Augustin Kpemasse
Jacques Agnon
Onyebuchi Okoro
Godwin Ntadom
Antoine Tanoh
Cyriaque Affoukou
Jimmy Opigo
Shawna Cooper
John J. Aponte
Kevin Griffith
Radina Soebiyanto
Michael Humes
author_sort Kim A. Lindblade
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Rapid diagnostic test (RDT) results are the foundation of both case management and malaria surveillance across sub-Saharan Africa. However, RDT results may be misrecorded in health facility registers by healthcare workers (HCWs), either unintentionally or deliberately, for example, to justify treatment based on clinical judgment. A multi-country evaluation was conducted to quantify the extent of RDT misrecording and identify factors associated with recording and reporting accuracy. This report summarizes the study’s methods, key findings, and implications for improving malaria RDT data quality. Methods A mixed-methods observational study was implemented in Benin, Côte d'Ivoire, Nigeria, and Uganda in 2023. At participating health facilities, images of RDTs were captured at the point of care and later reviewed by a trained, external panel. Agreement between the panel’s interpretation and the result recorded in the register was assessed using weighted mean Cohen’s kappa (κ). Secondary objectives included identifying factors associated with inaccurate recording, assessing the durability of RDT results after 1 month of storage, evaluating accuracy of data obtained from the District Health Information System 2 (DHIS2), and measuring the observer effect of the start of the study on test positivity rates (TPR) reported to DHIS2. Results A total of 102,337 RDT results was observed. Agreement between register-recorded results and the external panel was high, ranging from κ = 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75, 0.85) in Nigeria to κ = 0.88 (95% CI 0.84, 0.92) in Benin. HCWs were more likely to misrecord results as positive (range: 5.1–7.3%) than negative (range: 0.7–3.7%), and patient age was associated with misrecording results in all countries except Nigeria. After the study began in Côte d’Ivoire, TPRs reported from the DHIS2 declined significantly more in study than control facilities (rate ratio: 0.80, 95% CI 0.76, 0.84). Conclusions Although HCWs generally recorded RDT results accurately, the disproportionately higher proportion of results misrecorded as positive raises concern about possible intentional misreporting. The observed TPR decrease after study onset in Côte d’Ivoire suggests some HCWs can be motivated to reduce misrecording and improve the quality of malaria case management and surveillance data.
format Article
id doaj-art-628d6a645f1e4bc8a6c29427718e937b
institution Kabale University
issn 1475-2875
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Malaria Journal
spelling doaj-art-628d6a645f1e4bc8a6c29427718e937b2025-08-20T03:37:23ZengBMCMalaria Journal1475-28752025-07-0124111510.1186/s12936-025-05459-7Assessing the accuracy of the recording and reporting of malaria rapid diagnostic test results in four African countries: methods and key resultsKim A. Lindblade0Arthur Mpimbaza1Corine Ngufor2William Yavo3Sunday Atobatele4Ese Akpiroroh5Abibatou Konaté-Touré6Idelphonse Ahogni7Nelson Ssewante8Bosco Agaba9Augustin Kpemasse10Jacques Agnon11Onyebuchi Okoro12Godwin Ntadom13Antoine Tanoh14Cyriaque Affoukou15Jimmy Opigo16Shawna Cooper17John J. Aponte18Kevin Griffith19Radina Soebiyanto20Michael Humes21PMI Insights Project/PATHChild Health and Development Centre, Makerere UniversityCentre de Recherche Entomologique de CotonouInstitut National de Santé PubliqueSydani GroupSydani GroupInstitut National de Santé PubliqueCentre de Recherche Entomologique de CotonouChild Health and Development Centre, Makerere UniversityNational Malaria Control DivisionProgramme National de Lutte Contre le PaludismeProgramme National de Lutte Contre le PaludismeNational Malaria Elimination ProgrammeNational Malaria Elimination ProgrammeProgramme National de Lutte Contre le PaludismeProgramme National de Lutte Contre le PaludismeNational Malaria Control DivisionAuderePMI Insights Project/PATHU.S. President’s Malaria InitiativeU.S. President’s Malaria InitiativeU.S. President’s Malaria InitiativeAbstract Background Rapid diagnostic test (RDT) results are the foundation of both case management and malaria surveillance across sub-Saharan Africa. However, RDT results may be misrecorded in health facility registers by healthcare workers (HCWs), either unintentionally or deliberately, for example, to justify treatment based on clinical judgment. A multi-country evaluation was conducted to quantify the extent of RDT misrecording and identify factors associated with recording and reporting accuracy. This report summarizes the study’s methods, key findings, and implications for improving malaria RDT data quality. Methods A mixed-methods observational study was implemented in Benin, Côte d'Ivoire, Nigeria, and Uganda in 2023. At participating health facilities, images of RDTs were captured at the point of care and later reviewed by a trained, external panel. Agreement between the panel’s interpretation and the result recorded in the register was assessed using weighted mean Cohen’s kappa (κ). Secondary objectives included identifying factors associated with inaccurate recording, assessing the durability of RDT results after 1 month of storage, evaluating accuracy of data obtained from the District Health Information System 2 (DHIS2), and measuring the observer effect of the start of the study on test positivity rates (TPR) reported to DHIS2. Results A total of 102,337 RDT results was observed. Agreement between register-recorded results and the external panel was high, ranging from κ = 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75, 0.85) in Nigeria to κ = 0.88 (95% CI 0.84, 0.92) in Benin. HCWs were more likely to misrecord results as positive (range: 5.1–7.3%) than negative (range: 0.7–3.7%), and patient age was associated with misrecording results in all countries except Nigeria. After the study began in Côte d’Ivoire, TPRs reported from the DHIS2 declined significantly more in study than control facilities (rate ratio: 0.80, 95% CI 0.76, 0.84). Conclusions Although HCWs generally recorded RDT results accurately, the disproportionately higher proportion of results misrecorded as positive raises concern about possible intentional misreporting. The observed TPR decrease after study onset in Côte d’Ivoire suggests some HCWs can be motivated to reduce misrecording and improve the quality of malaria case management and surveillance data.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-025-05459-7MalariaRapid diagnostic testsDiagnosisHealth management information systemsSurveillanceData quality
spellingShingle Kim A. Lindblade
Arthur Mpimbaza
Corine Ngufor
William Yavo
Sunday Atobatele
Ese Akpiroroh
Abibatou Konaté-Touré
Idelphonse Ahogni
Nelson Ssewante
Bosco Agaba
Augustin Kpemasse
Jacques Agnon
Onyebuchi Okoro
Godwin Ntadom
Antoine Tanoh
Cyriaque Affoukou
Jimmy Opigo
Shawna Cooper
John J. Aponte
Kevin Griffith
Radina Soebiyanto
Michael Humes
Assessing the accuracy of the recording and reporting of malaria rapid diagnostic test results in four African countries: methods and key results
Malaria Journal
Malaria
Rapid diagnostic tests
Diagnosis
Health management information systems
Surveillance
Data quality
title Assessing the accuracy of the recording and reporting of malaria rapid diagnostic test results in four African countries: methods and key results
title_full Assessing the accuracy of the recording and reporting of malaria rapid diagnostic test results in four African countries: methods and key results
title_fullStr Assessing the accuracy of the recording and reporting of malaria rapid diagnostic test results in four African countries: methods and key results
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the accuracy of the recording and reporting of malaria rapid diagnostic test results in four African countries: methods and key results
title_short Assessing the accuracy of the recording and reporting of malaria rapid diagnostic test results in four African countries: methods and key results
title_sort assessing the accuracy of the recording and reporting of malaria rapid diagnostic test results in four african countries methods and key results
topic Malaria
Rapid diagnostic tests
Diagnosis
Health management information systems
Surveillance
Data quality
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-025-05459-7
work_keys_str_mv AT kimalindblade assessingtheaccuracyoftherecordingandreportingofmalariarapiddiagnostictestresultsinfourafricancountriesmethodsandkeyresults
AT arthurmpimbaza assessingtheaccuracyoftherecordingandreportingofmalariarapiddiagnostictestresultsinfourafricancountriesmethodsandkeyresults
AT corinengufor assessingtheaccuracyoftherecordingandreportingofmalariarapiddiagnostictestresultsinfourafricancountriesmethodsandkeyresults
AT williamyavo assessingtheaccuracyoftherecordingandreportingofmalariarapiddiagnostictestresultsinfourafricancountriesmethodsandkeyresults
AT sundayatobatele assessingtheaccuracyoftherecordingandreportingofmalariarapiddiagnostictestresultsinfourafricancountriesmethodsandkeyresults
AT eseakpiroroh assessingtheaccuracyoftherecordingandreportingofmalariarapiddiagnostictestresultsinfourafricancountriesmethodsandkeyresults
AT abibatoukonatetoure assessingtheaccuracyoftherecordingandreportingofmalariarapiddiagnostictestresultsinfourafricancountriesmethodsandkeyresults
AT idelphonseahogni assessingtheaccuracyoftherecordingandreportingofmalariarapiddiagnostictestresultsinfourafricancountriesmethodsandkeyresults
AT nelsonssewante assessingtheaccuracyoftherecordingandreportingofmalariarapiddiagnostictestresultsinfourafricancountriesmethodsandkeyresults
AT boscoagaba assessingtheaccuracyoftherecordingandreportingofmalariarapiddiagnostictestresultsinfourafricancountriesmethodsandkeyresults
AT augustinkpemasse assessingtheaccuracyoftherecordingandreportingofmalariarapiddiagnostictestresultsinfourafricancountriesmethodsandkeyresults
AT jacquesagnon assessingtheaccuracyoftherecordingandreportingofmalariarapiddiagnostictestresultsinfourafricancountriesmethodsandkeyresults
AT onyebuchiokoro assessingtheaccuracyoftherecordingandreportingofmalariarapiddiagnostictestresultsinfourafricancountriesmethodsandkeyresults
AT godwinntadom assessingtheaccuracyoftherecordingandreportingofmalariarapiddiagnostictestresultsinfourafricancountriesmethodsandkeyresults
AT antoinetanoh assessingtheaccuracyoftherecordingandreportingofmalariarapiddiagnostictestresultsinfourafricancountriesmethodsandkeyresults
AT cyriaqueaffoukou assessingtheaccuracyoftherecordingandreportingofmalariarapiddiagnostictestresultsinfourafricancountriesmethodsandkeyresults
AT jimmyopigo assessingtheaccuracyoftherecordingandreportingofmalariarapiddiagnostictestresultsinfourafricancountriesmethodsandkeyresults
AT shawnacooper assessingtheaccuracyoftherecordingandreportingofmalariarapiddiagnostictestresultsinfourafricancountriesmethodsandkeyresults
AT johnjaponte assessingtheaccuracyoftherecordingandreportingofmalariarapiddiagnostictestresultsinfourafricancountriesmethodsandkeyresults
AT kevingriffith assessingtheaccuracyoftherecordingandreportingofmalariarapiddiagnostictestresultsinfourafricancountriesmethodsandkeyresults
AT radinasoebiyanto assessingtheaccuracyoftherecordingandreportingofmalariarapiddiagnostictestresultsinfourafricancountriesmethodsandkeyresults
AT michaelhumes assessingtheaccuracyoftherecordingandreportingofmalariarapiddiagnostictestresultsinfourafricancountriesmethodsandkeyresults