Isolation and Identification of Infection-Causing Bacteria in Dairy Animals and Determination of Their Antibiogram
Pathogens are always a threat to the livestock and domestic animals due to their exposure to the contaminated environments. The study was conducted to evaluation of the prevalence of Escherichia coli, Shigella spp., Salmonella spp., and S. aureus, in farm animals (cattle and buffalos). A total of 15...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2021-01-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Food Quality |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/2958304 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849411694827143168 |
|---|---|
| author | Safia Arbab Hanif Ullah Weiwei Wang Ka Li Ali Akbar Jiyu Zhang |
| author_facet | Safia Arbab Hanif Ullah Weiwei Wang Ka Li Ali Akbar Jiyu Zhang |
| author_sort | Safia Arbab |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Pathogens are always a threat to the livestock and domestic animals due to their exposure to the contaminated environments. The study was conducted to evaluation of the prevalence of Escherichia coli, Shigella spp., Salmonella spp., and S. aureus, in farm animals (cattle and buffalos). A total of 150 (n = 150) samples were collected from cattle and buffaloes, 60 samples from cows’ and buffalo’s teats milk, 30 of water samples, and 60 of fecal samples isolates from dairy farm animals, which may act as reservoir disseminating such pathogens. Farm hygiene, management, and milking procedure were listed through a questionnaire. The most common pathogens detected in this study was E. coli 88 (58%) and S. aureus 81 (54%), followed by Salmonella spp. 32 (21%), and Shigella spp. 44 (29%), respectively. During the antibiogram studies, the results revealed that the highest number of bacterial isolates showed resistance against ampicillin 50 (56.8%), followed by ciprofloxacin 23 (26.1%) and augmentin 22 (25%) of Escherichia coli and ampicillin 49 (60.4%), cefpodoxime 23 (28.3%), and augmentin 20 (24.6%) of S. aureus. In the case of Salmonella spp., the highest resistance was showed by amoxicillin 16 (50%). In Shigella spp., the highest resistance was shown by ampicillin 16 (36.3%), followed by cefpodoxime and ceftazidime 10 (22.7%). The high frequency of isolates in this investigation with multiple antibiotic resistance ranges from 15. MARI % value of S. aureus and E. coli 15 (12.5%), followed by Salmonella and Shigella spp. ranges from 12 (10%), suggesting the presence of various antibiotic-resistant bacteria as well as highly resistant bacteria. The mean ± SD zone areas for the greater resistance are for E. coli and S. aureus, already known to be multiresistant, followed by Salmonella spp. and Shigella spp., when the zone areas are for the low resistance, and the findings determined that there was a little difference between S. aureus and E. coli. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-628d354de19e41af81f14f2ff31ddde9 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1745-4557 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2021-01-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Food Quality |
| spelling | doaj-art-628d354de19e41af81f14f2ff31ddde92025-08-20T03:34:41ZengWileyJournal of Food Quality1745-45572021-01-01202110.1155/2021/2958304Isolation and Identification of Infection-Causing Bacteria in Dairy Animals and Determination of Their AntibiogramSafia Arbab0Hanif Ullah1Weiwei Wang2Ka Li3Ali Akbar4Jiyu Zhang5Key Laboratory of Veterinary Pharmaceutical DevelopmentWest China School of NursingKey Laboratory of Veterinary Pharmaceutical DevelopmentWest China School of NursingDepartment of MicrobiologyKey Laboratory of Veterinary Pharmaceutical DevelopmentPathogens are always a threat to the livestock and domestic animals due to their exposure to the contaminated environments. The study was conducted to evaluation of the prevalence of Escherichia coli, Shigella spp., Salmonella spp., and S. aureus, in farm animals (cattle and buffalos). A total of 150 (n = 150) samples were collected from cattle and buffaloes, 60 samples from cows’ and buffalo’s teats milk, 30 of water samples, and 60 of fecal samples isolates from dairy farm animals, which may act as reservoir disseminating such pathogens. Farm hygiene, management, and milking procedure were listed through a questionnaire. The most common pathogens detected in this study was E. coli 88 (58%) and S. aureus 81 (54%), followed by Salmonella spp. 32 (21%), and Shigella spp. 44 (29%), respectively. During the antibiogram studies, the results revealed that the highest number of bacterial isolates showed resistance against ampicillin 50 (56.8%), followed by ciprofloxacin 23 (26.1%) and augmentin 22 (25%) of Escherichia coli and ampicillin 49 (60.4%), cefpodoxime 23 (28.3%), and augmentin 20 (24.6%) of S. aureus. In the case of Salmonella spp., the highest resistance was showed by amoxicillin 16 (50%). In Shigella spp., the highest resistance was shown by ampicillin 16 (36.3%), followed by cefpodoxime and ceftazidime 10 (22.7%). The high frequency of isolates in this investigation with multiple antibiotic resistance ranges from 15. MARI % value of S. aureus and E. coli 15 (12.5%), followed by Salmonella and Shigella spp. ranges from 12 (10%), suggesting the presence of various antibiotic-resistant bacteria as well as highly resistant bacteria. The mean ± SD zone areas for the greater resistance are for E. coli and S. aureus, already known to be multiresistant, followed by Salmonella spp. and Shigella spp., when the zone areas are for the low resistance, and the findings determined that there was a little difference between S. aureus and E. coli.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/2958304 |
| spellingShingle | Safia Arbab Hanif Ullah Weiwei Wang Ka Li Ali Akbar Jiyu Zhang Isolation and Identification of Infection-Causing Bacteria in Dairy Animals and Determination of Their Antibiogram Journal of Food Quality |
| title | Isolation and Identification of Infection-Causing Bacteria in Dairy Animals and Determination of Their Antibiogram |
| title_full | Isolation and Identification of Infection-Causing Bacteria in Dairy Animals and Determination of Their Antibiogram |
| title_fullStr | Isolation and Identification of Infection-Causing Bacteria in Dairy Animals and Determination of Their Antibiogram |
| title_full_unstemmed | Isolation and Identification of Infection-Causing Bacteria in Dairy Animals and Determination of Their Antibiogram |
| title_short | Isolation and Identification of Infection-Causing Bacteria in Dairy Animals and Determination of Their Antibiogram |
| title_sort | isolation and identification of infection causing bacteria in dairy animals and determination of their antibiogram |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/2958304 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT safiaarbab isolationandidentificationofinfectioncausingbacteriaindairyanimalsanddeterminationoftheirantibiogram AT hanifullah isolationandidentificationofinfectioncausingbacteriaindairyanimalsanddeterminationoftheirantibiogram AT weiweiwang isolationandidentificationofinfectioncausingbacteriaindairyanimalsanddeterminationoftheirantibiogram AT kali isolationandidentificationofinfectioncausingbacteriaindairyanimalsanddeterminationoftheirantibiogram AT aliakbar isolationandidentificationofinfectioncausingbacteriaindairyanimalsanddeterminationoftheirantibiogram AT jiyuzhang isolationandidentificationofinfectioncausingbacteriaindairyanimalsanddeterminationoftheirantibiogram |