Moderate Epistemic Akrasia

Moderate epistemic akrasia is the state a subject is in when she believes that p and suspends judgment about whether her evidence supports p. In this article it is argued that, given a certain understanding of the attitude of suspension of judgment, moderate epistemic akrasia is doxastically irratio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nicolás Lo Guercio
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM) 2018-09-01
Series:Crítica
Subjects:
Online Access:http://critica.filosoficas.unam.mx/pg/en/descarga_ing.php?id_volumen=183&id_articulo=1141
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846093082757431296
author Nicolás Lo Guercio
author_facet Nicolás Lo Guercio
author_sort Nicolás Lo Guercio
collection DOAJ
description Moderate epistemic akrasia is the state a subject is in when she believes that p and suspends judgment about whether her evidence supports p. In this article it is argued that, given a certain understanding of the attitude of suspension of judgment, moderate epistemic akrasia is doxastically irrational. The paper starts with a brief introduction that makes explicit some background notions and clarifies the dialectics of the debate. Second, the well-known distinction between propositional and doxastic rationality is introduced and some cases of improper basing are discussed (Turri 2011). Third, two different cases are considered in which one might argue that moderate epistemic akrasia is doxastically rational, and it is argued that none is successful. Fourth, several objections are presented and answered. Finally, some conclusions are drawn.
format Article
id doaj-art-6264514205a74df584b6731327d40aab
institution Kabale University
issn 0011-1503
1870-4905
language English
publishDate 2018-09-01
publisher Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM)
record_format Article
series Crítica
spelling doaj-art-6264514205a74df584b6731327d40aab2025-01-02T19:06:39ZengUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM)Crítica0011-15031870-49052018-09-01501486997Moderate Epistemic AkrasiaNicolás Lo GuercioModerate epistemic akrasia is the state a subject is in when she believes that p and suspends judgment about whether her evidence supports p. In this article it is argued that, given a certain understanding of the attitude of suspension of judgment, moderate epistemic akrasia is doxastically irrational. The paper starts with a brief introduction that makes explicit some background notions and clarifies the dialectics of the debate. Second, the well-known distinction between propositional and doxastic rationality is introduced and some cases of improper basing are discussed (Turri 2011). Third, two different cases are considered in which one might argue that moderate epistemic akrasia is doxastically rational, and it is argued that none is successful. Fourth, several objections are presented and answered. Finally, some conclusions are drawn.http://critica.filosoficas.unam.mx/pg/en/descarga_ing.php?id_volumen=183&id_articulo=1141suspension of judgmenthigher-order evidencedoxastic rationalitypropositional rationalityepistemic basing relation
spellingShingle Nicolás Lo Guercio
Moderate Epistemic Akrasia
Crítica
suspension of judgment
higher-order evidence
doxastic rationality
propositional rationality
epistemic basing relation
title Moderate Epistemic Akrasia
title_full Moderate Epistemic Akrasia
title_fullStr Moderate Epistemic Akrasia
title_full_unstemmed Moderate Epistemic Akrasia
title_short Moderate Epistemic Akrasia
title_sort moderate epistemic akrasia
topic suspension of judgment
higher-order evidence
doxastic rationality
propositional rationality
epistemic basing relation
url http://critica.filosoficas.unam.mx/pg/en/descarga_ing.php?id_volumen=183&id_articulo=1141
work_keys_str_mv AT nicolasloguercio moderateepistemicakrasia