Risk, Reality, Regulations? Finding what’s reasonable in copyright guidance
Copyright guidance at an academic library is often provided at the nexus of the law, University policy, and the personal and professional values of the librarians and users involved in the decision making. An institution’s tolerance for risk (or lack-thereof) can create tension with librarians’ val...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University of Kansas Libraries
2025-08-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Copyright in Education and Librarianship |
| Online Access: | https://journals.ku.edu/jcel/article/view/23195 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849229163785879552 |
|---|---|
| author | Lauren Byl |
| author_facet | Lauren Byl |
| author_sort | Lauren Byl |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
Copyright guidance at an academic library is often provided at the nexus of the law, University policy, and the personal and professional values of the librarians and users involved in the decision making. An institution’s tolerance for risk (or lack-thereof) can create tension with librarians’ value systems. The law is often vague, leaving lots of room for differences of interpretation between University administrators, librarians, and users. Professional values, like the ones articulated by the ACRL Framework generally align with enhancing/supporting user’s rights and tend towards a copyleft point of view. Institutional risk tolerance complicates decision making further. Higher levels of risk are generally accepted with research and teaching endeavours, directly in contrast with a lower level of risk acceptable when it comes to compliance with the law (like the Copyright Act). Lack of clarity in the law and institutional risk tolerance can be at odds with professional values, which can confuse users and undermine librarians providing guidance.
This article provides a beginning framework for understanding reasonableness in copyright decisions while taking into account the variety of pressures on copyright librarians. A set of cases are used to test the framework and a reasonableness chart is provided to allow for comparison of the cases.
|
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-622d19dc48d34535941c77d8b7ee1cb8 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2473-8336 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-08-01 |
| publisher | University of Kansas Libraries |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Copyright in Education and Librarianship |
| spelling | doaj-art-622d19dc48d34535941c77d8b7ee1cb82025-08-22T05:00:26ZengUniversity of Kansas LibrariesJournal of Copyright in Education and Librarianship2473-83362025-08-018110.17161/jcel.v8i1.23195Risk, Reality, Regulations? Finding what’s reasonable in copyright guidanceLauren Byl0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4576-607XUniversity of Waterloo Copyright guidance at an academic library is often provided at the nexus of the law, University policy, and the personal and professional values of the librarians and users involved in the decision making. An institution’s tolerance for risk (or lack-thereof) can create tension with librarians’ value systems. The law is often vague, leaving lots of room for differences of interpretation between University administrators, librarians, and users. Professional values, like the ones articulated by the ACRL Framework generally align with enhancing/supporting user’s rights and tend towards a copyleft point of view. Institutional risk tolerance complicates decision making further. Higher levels of risk are generally accepted with research and teaching endeavours, directly in contrast with a lower level of risk acceptable when it comes to compliance with the law (like the Copyright Act). Lack of clarity in the law and institutional risk tolerance can be at odds with professional values, which can confuse users and undermine librarians providing guidance. This article provides a beginning framework for understanding reasonableness in copyright decisions while taking into account the variety of pressures on copyright librarians. A set of cases are used to test the framework and a reasonableness chart is provided to allow for comparison of the cases. https://journals.ku.edu/jcel/article/view/23195 |
| spellingShingle | Lauren Byl Risk, Reality, Regulations? Finding what’s reasonable in copyright guidance Journal of Copyright in Education and Librarianship |
| title | Risk, Reality, Regulations? Finding what’s reasonable in copyright guidance |
| title_full | Risk, Reality, Regulations? Finding what’s reasonable in copyright guidance |
| title_fullStr | Risk, Reality, Regulations? Finding what’s reasonable in copyright guidance |
| title_full_unstemmed | Risk, Reality, Regulations? Finding what’s reasonable in copyright guidance |
| title_short | Risk, Reality, Regulations? Finding what’s reasonable in copyright guidance |
| title_sort | risk reality regulations finding what s reasonable in copyright guidance |
| url | https://journals.ku.edu/jcel/article/view/23195 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT laurenbyl riskrealityregulationsfindingwhatsreasonableincopyrightguidance |