Application of augmented reality navigation in oral surgery
BACKGROUND: Augmented reality is a potential alternative for surgical navigation, as it can provide visualization of various anatomical structures of the maxillofacial region. We have developed a specific platform for three-dimensional model management and intraoperative augmented reality navigation...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Eco-Vector
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Digital Diagnostics |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://jdigitaldiagnostics.com/DD/article/viewFile/624183/pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850284094130225152 |
|---|---|
| author | Anna V. Lysenko Andrei I. Yaremenko Vladimir M. Ivanov Anton Y. Smirnov Аlexandr I. Lyubimov Charles S. M. Izzard Alina A. Prokofeva |
| author_facet | Anna V. Lysenko Andrei I. Yaremenko Vladimir M. Ivanov Anton Y. Smirnov Аlexandr I. Lyubimov Charles S. M. Izzard Alina A. Prokofeva |
| author_sort | Anna V. Lysenko |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | BACKGROUND: Augmented reality is a potential alternative for surgical navigation, as it can provide visualization of various anatomical structures of the maxillofacial region. We have developed a specific platform for three-dimensional model management and intraoperative augmented reality navigation for surgical procedures.
AIM: To evaluate surgeons’ perceptions and the usability of augmented reality navigation for the most common surgical procedures in oral surgery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a phantom study to determine the accuracy of the augmented reality system in the maxillofacial region. Registration errors typical in image-guided surgery were measured: fiducial registration error, target registration error, and fiducial localization error. Thereafter, a clinical trial with several surgeons performing surgical procedures on jaws using augmented reality technology was conducted. Surgeons filled out a dedicated questionnaire after their experience with augmented reality navigation.
RESULTS: The mean fiducial registration error was 0.9 mm (standard deviation 0.7 mm; 95% confidence interval 0.4–1.3 mm). The mean target registration error was 1.3 mm (standard deviation 0.5 mm; 95% confidence interval 1.1–1.5 mm). The fiducial localization error was the most significant with 2.2 mm (standard deviation 0.9; 95% confidence interval 1.9–2.5 mm). The higher rankings in the user experience questionnaire were related to the novelty and excitement of using augmented reality navigation in maxillofacial surgery. The pragmatic quality aspect explains the technical focus of perception to achieve goals in a product, system, or service design. Efficiency was expected to be slightly higher; however, in our opinion, this is due to the technical difficulties of the system for novel augmented reality technology.
CONCLUSION: The results revealed the satisfactory accuracy of the augmented reality system in the maxillofacial region and the user experience of the augmented reality navigation system for oral surgery. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-622b9d3e5463418a87b6aee70480d1fa |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 2712-8490 2712-8962 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
| publisher | Eco-Vector |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Digital Diagnostics |
| spelling | doaj-art-622b9d3e5463418a87b6aee70480d1fa2025-08-20T01:47:38ZengEco-VectorDigital Diagnostics2712-84902712-89622024-12-015345046610.17816/DD62418376691Application of augmented reality navigation in oral surgeryAnna V. Lysenko0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5625-1085Andrei I. Yaremenko1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7700-7724Vladimir M. Ivanov2https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8194-2718Anton Y. Smirnov3https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2440-2499Аlexandr I. Lyubimov4https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7872-9593Charles S. M. Izzard5https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5893-1448Alina A. Prokofeva6https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7461-4633Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial SurgeryAcademician I.P. Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical UniversityPeter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic UniversityPeter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic UniversityKirov’s Military Medical AcademyUniversity of ExeterAcademician I.P. Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical UniversityBACKGROUND: Augmented reality is a potential alternative for surgical navigation, as it can provide visualization of various anatomical structures of the maxillofacial region. We have developed a specific platform for three-dimensional model management and intraoperative augmented reality navigation for surgical procedures. AIM: To evaluate surgeons’ perceptions and the usability of augmented reality navigation for the most common surgical procedures in oral surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a phantom study to determine the accuracy of the augmented reality system in the maxillofacial region. Registration errors typical in image-guided surgery were measured: fiducial registration error, target registration error, and fiducial localization error. Thereafter, a clinical trial with several surgeons performing surgical procedures on jaws using augmented reality technology was conducted. Surgeons filled out a dedicated questionnaire after their experience with augmented reality navigation. RESULTS: The mean fiducial registration error was 0.9 mm (standard deviation 0.7 mm; 95% confidence interval 0.4–1.3 mm). The mean target registration error was 1.3 mm (standard deviation 0.5 mm; 95% confidence interval 1.1–1.5 mm). The fiducial localization error was the most significant with 2.2 mm (standard deviation 0.9; 95% confidence interval 1.9–2.5 mm). The higher rankings in the user experience questionnaire were related to the novelty and excitement of using augmented reality navigation in maxillofacial surgery. The pragmatic quality aspect explains the technical focus of perception to achieve goals in a product, system, or service design. Efficiency was expected to be slightly higher; however, in our opinion, this is due to the technical difficulties of the system for novel augmented reality technology. CONCLUSION: The results revealed the satisfactory accuracy of the augmented reality system in the maxillofacial region and the user experience of the augmented reality navigation system for oral surgery.https://jdigitaldiagnostics.com/DD/article/viewFile/624183/pdfaugmented realityintraoperative navigationoral surgery |
| spellingShingle | Anna V. Lysenko Andrei I. Yaremenko Vladimir M. Ivanov Anton Y. Smirnov Аlexandr I. Lyubimov Charles S. M. Izzard Alina A. Prokofeva Application of augmented reality navigation in oral surgery Digital Diagnostics augmented reality intraoperative navigation oral surgery |
| title | Application of augmented reality navigation in oral surgery |
| title_full | Application of augmented reality navigation in oral surgery |
| title_fullStr | Application of augmented reality navigation in oral surgery |
| title_full_unstemmed | Application of augmented reality navigation in oral surgery |
| title_short | Application of augmented reality navigation in oral surgery |
| title_sort | application of augmented reality navigation in oral surgery |
| topic | augmented reality intraoperative navigation oral surgery |
| url | https://jdigitaldiagnostics.com/DD/article/viewFile/624183/pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT annavlysenko applicationofaugmentedrealitynavigationinoralsurgery AT andreiiyaremenko applicationofaugmentedrealitynavigationinoralsurgery AT vladimirmivanov applicationofaugmentedrealitynavigationinoralsurgery AT antonysmirnov applicationofaugmentedrealitynavigationinoralsurgery AT alexandrilyubimov applicationofaugmentedrealitynavigationinoralsurgery AT charlessmizzard applicationofaugmentedrealitynavigationinoralsurgery AT alinaaprokofeva applicationofaugmentedrealitynavigationinoralsurgery |