Exploring the perception of pre-clinical and clinical educators on clinical reasoning: A qualitative study.

<h4>Introduction</h4>Educators have differing perception on the definition and conceptualization of clinical reasoning. Even though clinical reasoning is important in making a sound diagnosis and reducing diagnostic error, educators proved to be a barrier in teaching clinical reasoning d...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Siti Norashikin Mohd Tambeh, Farah Dayana Zahedi, Mohamad Nurman Yaman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2025-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0320220
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849327973815025664
author Siti Norashikin Mohd Tambeh
Farah Dayana Zahedi
Mohamad Nurman Yaman
author_facet Siti Norashikin Mohd Tambeh
Farah Dayana Zahedi
Mohamad Nurman Yaman
author_sort Siti Norashikin Mohd Tambeh
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Introduction</h4>Educators have differing perception on the definition and conceptualization of clinical reasoning. Even though clinical reasoning is important in making a sound diagnosis and reducing diagnostic error, educators proved to be a barrier in teaching clinical reasoning due to the lack of awareness of their own reasoning process.<h4>Objectives</h4>This study was conducted to investigate the perception and understanding of pre-clinical and clinical educators on what clinical reasoning entails, their experience, and educational strategies in teaching clinical reasoning.<h4>Method</h4>A semi-structured interview was conducted with fifteen educators encompassing pre-clinical (basic science, laboratory-based) and clinical (surgical-based, medical-based, community-based and emergency medicine) educators. The transcribed interview data was then analysed thematically.<h4>Results</h4>Eight main themes were identified. Knowledge and experience were seen as important components in developing clinical reasoning. It was possible to teach clinical reasoning although there were some difficulties thus the need to have a train-the-trainer programme. Early introduction of clinical reasoning with its incorporation in various teaching and learning method; and the involvement of technological advances were also mentioned by the participants. However, pre-clinical educators did not perceive the importance of these technological advances. Role of educators; cognitive and non-cognitive attributes were also important in developing clinical reasoning.<h4>Conclusion</h4>The perception and understanding of pre-clinical and clinical educators on clinical reasoning did not really differ. They believed that clinical reasoning can be taught, and a train-the-trainer program may be of immeasurable benefit.
format Article
id doaj-art-621553e614f547d0bbc640e1ee0cece9
institution Kabale University
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-621553e614f547d0bbc640e1ee0cece92025-08-20T03:47:44ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032025-01-01203e032022010.1371/journal.pone.0320220Exploring the perception of pre-clinical and clinical educators on clinical reasoning: A qualitative study.Siti Norashikin Mohd TambehFarah Dayana ZahediMohamad Nurman Yaman<h4>Introduction</h4>Educators have differing perception on the definition and conceptualization of clinical reasoning. Even though clinical reasoning is important in making a sound diagnosis and reducing diagnostic error, educators proved to be a barrier in teaching clinical reasoning due to the lack of awareness of their own reasoning process.<h4>Objectives</h4>This study was conducted to investigate the perception and understanding of pre-clinical and clinical educators on what clinical reasoning entails, their experience, and educational strategies in teaching clinical reasoning.<h4>Method</h4>A semi-structured interview was conducted with fifteen educators encompassing pre-clinical (basic science, laboratory-based) and clinical (surgical-based, medical-based, community-based and emergency medicine) educators. The transcribed interview data was then analysed thematically.<h4>Results</h4>Eight main themes were identified. Knowledge and experience were seen as important components in developing clinical reasoning. It was possible to teach clinical reasoning although there were some difficulties thus the need to have a train-the-trainer programme. Early introduction of clinical reasoning with its incorporation in various teaching and learning method; and the involvement of technological advances were also mentioned by the participants. However, pre-clinical educators did not perceive the importance of these technological advances. Role of educators; cognitive and non-cognitive attributes were also important in developing clinical reasoning.<h4>Conclusion</h4>The perception and understanding of pre-clinical and clinical educators on clinical reasoning did not really differ. They believed that clinical reasoning can be taught, and a train-the-trainer program may be of immeasurable benefit.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0320220
spellingShingle Siti Norashikin Mohd Tambeh
Farah Dayana Zahedi
Mohamad Nurman Yaman
Exploring the perception of pre-clinical and clinical educators on clinical reasoning: A qualitative study.
PLoS ONE
title Exploring the perception of pre-clinical and clinical educators on clinical reasoning: A qualitative study.
title_full Exploring the perception of pre-clinical and clinical educators on clinical reasoning: A qualitative study.
title_fullStr Exploring the perception of pre-clinical and clinical educators on clinical reasoning: A qualitative study.
title_full_unstemmed Exploring the perception of pre-clinical and clinical educators on clinical reasoning: A qualitative study.
title_short Exploring the perception of pre-clinical and clinical educators on clinical reasoning: A qualitative study.
title_sort exploring the perception of pre clinical and clinical educators on clinical reasoning a qualitative study
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0320220
work_keys_str_mv AT sitinorashikinmohdtambeh exploringtheperceptionofpreclinicalandclinicaleducatorsonclinicalreasoningaqualitativestudy
AT farahdayanazahedi exploringtheperceptionofpreclinicalandclinicaleducatorsonclinicalreasoningaqualitativestudy
AT mohamadnurmanyaman exploringtheperceptionofpreclinicalandclinicaleducatorsonclinicalreasoningaqualitativestudy