In Vitro Evaluation of Bioactivity of Chemically Deposited Hydroxyapatite on Polyether Ether Ketone
Polyether ether ketone (PEEK) is considered the best alternative material for titanium for spinal fusion cage implants due to its low elasticity modulus and radiolucent property. The main problem of PEEK is its bioinert properties. Coating with hydroxyapatite (HA) showed very good improvement in bio...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2015-01-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Biomaterials |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/475435 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832549655587586048 |
---|---|
author | D. Almasi S. Izman M. Sadeghi N. Iqbal F. Roozbahani G. Krishnamurithy T. Kamarul M. R. Abdul Kadir |
author_facet | D. Almasi S. Izman M. Sadeghi N. Iqbal F. Roozbahani G. Krishnamurithy T. Kamarul M. R. Abdul Kadir |
author_sort | D. Almasi |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Polyether ether ketone (PEEK) is considered the best alternative material for titanium for spinal fusion cage implants due to its low elasticity modulus and radiolucent property. The main problem of PEEK is its bioinert properties. Coating with hydroxyapatite (HA) showed very good improvement in bioactivity of the PEEK implants. However the existing methods for deposition of HA have some disadvantages and damage the PEEK substrate. In our previous study a new method for deposition of HA on PEEK was presented. In this study cell proliferation of mesenchymal stem cell and apatite formation in simulated body fluid (SBF) tests were conducted to probe the effect of this new method in improvement of the bioactivity of PEEK. The mesenchymal stem cell proliferation result showed better cells proliferation on the treated layer in comparison with untreated PEEK. The apatite formation results showed the growth of the HA on the treated PEEK but there was not any sight of the growth of HA on the untreated PEEK even after 2 weeks. The results showed the new method of the HA deposition improved the bioactivity of the treated PEEK in comparison with the bare PEEK. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-620ff7aed38542b9a99efa9e9911e1a5 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1687-8787 1687-8795 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015-01-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | International Journal of Biomaterials |
spelling | doaj-art-620ff7aed38542b9a99efa9e9911e1a52025-02-03T06:10:48ZengWileyInternational Journal of Biomaterials1687-87871687-87952015-01-01201510.1155/2015/475435475435In Vitro Evaluation of Bioactivity of Chemically Deposited Hydroxyapatite on Polyether Ether KetoneD. Almasi0S. Izman1M. Sadeghi2N. Iqbal3F. Roozbahani4G. Krishnamurithy5T. Kamarul6M. R. Abdul Kadir7Department of Manufacturing and Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Skudai, Johor, MalaysiaDepartment of Manufacturing and Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Skudai, Johor, MalaysiaFaculty of Chemical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Johor Bahru, Johor, MalaysiaMedical Devices & Technology Group (MEDITEG), Faculty of Bioscience and Medical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Skudai, Johor, MalaysiaFaculty of Bioscience and Medical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Skudai, Johor, MalaysiaInstitute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Sherrington Building, Liverpool L69 3GE, UKDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, NOCERAL, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, MalaysiaMedical Devices & Technology Group (MEDITEG), Faculty of Bioscience and Medical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Skudai, Johor, MalaysiaPolyether ether ketone (PEEK) is considered the best alternative material for titanium for spinal fusion cage implants due to its low elasticity modulus and radiolucent property. The main problem of PEEK is its bioinert properties. Coating with hydroxyapatite (HA) showed very good improvement in bioactivity of the PEEK implants. However the existing methods for deposition of HA have some disadvantages and damage the PEEK substrate. In our previous study a new method for deposition of HA on PEEK was presented. In this study cell proliferation of mesenchymal stem cell and apatite formation in simulated body fluid (SBF) tests were conducted to probe the effect of this new method in improvement of the bioactivity of PEEK. The mesenchymal stem cell proliferation result showed better cells proliferation on the treated layer in comparison with untreated PEEK. The apatite formation results showed the growth of the HA on the treated PEEK but there was not any sight of the growth of HA on the untreated PEEK even after 2 weeks. The results showed the new method of the HA deposition improved the bioactivity of the treated PEEK in comparison with the bare PEEK.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/475435 |
spellingShingle | D. Almasi S. Izman M. Sadeghi N. Iqbal F. Roozbahani G. Krishnamurithy T. Kamarul M. R. Abdul Kadir In Vitro Evaluation of Bioactivity of Chemically Deposited Hydroxyapatite on Polyether Ether Ketone International Journal of Biomaterials |
title | In Vitro Evaluation of Bioactivity of Chemically Deposited Hydroxyapatite on Polyether Ether Ketone |
title_full | In Vitro Evaluation of Bioactivity of Chemically Deposited Hydroxyapatite on Polyether Ether Ketone |
title_fullStr | In Vitro Evaluation of Bioactivity of Chemically Deposited Hydroxyapatite on Polyether Ether Ketone |
title_full_unstemmed | In Vitro Evaluation of Bioactivity of Chemically Deposited Hydroxyapatite on Polyether Ether Ketone |
title_short | In Vitro Evaluation of Bioactivity of Chemically Deposited Hydroxyapatite on Polyether Ether Ketone |
title_sort | in vitro evaluation of bioactivity of chemically deposited hydroxyapatite on polyether ether ketone |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/475435 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dalmasi invitroevaluationofbioactivityofchemicallydepositedhydroxyapatiteonpolyetheretherketone AT sizman invitroevaluationofbioactivityofchemicallydepositedhydroxyapatiteonpolyetheretherketone AT msadeghi invitroevaluationofbioactivityofchemicallydepositedhydroxyapatiteonpolyetheretherketone AT niqbal invitroevaluationofbioactivityofchemicallydepositedhydroxyapatiteonpolyetheretherketone AT froozbahani invitroevaluationofbioactivityofchemicallydepositedhydroxyapatiteonpolyetheretherketone AT gkrishnamurithy invitroevaluationofbioactivityofchemicallydepositedhydroxyapatiteonpolyetheretherketone AT tkamarul invitroevaluationofbioactivityofchemicallydepositedhydroxyapatiteonpolyetheretherketone AT mrabdulkadir invitroevaluationofbioactivityofchemicallydepositedhydroxyapatiteonpolyetheretherketone |