Learnings From the Co‐Development of Priority Risks in Australia's First National Climate Risk Assessment

ABSTRACT Australia's first National Climate Risk Assessment is built on the latest science as well as learnings from other countries’ national risk assessments. The goal of the risk assessment was to identify the priority risks of climate change to Australia as a nation. Due to timeline obligat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Brenda B. Lin, Aysha Fleming, Lygia Romanach, Fanny A. Boulaire, Tim Capon, Murni Po, Stephen Cook, Rebecca Darbyshire, Sonia Bluhm, Guy Barnett
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-06-01
Series:Climate Resilience and Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/cli2.70004
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849426533664423936
author Brenda B. Lin
Aysha Fleming
Lygia Romanach
Fanny A. Boulaire
Tim Capon
Murni Po
Stephen Cook
Rebecca Darbyshire
Sonia Bluhm
Guy Barnett
author_facet Brenda B. Lin
Aysha Fleming
Lygia Romanach
Fanny A. Boulaire
Tim Capon
Murni Po
Stephen Cook
Rebecca Darbyshire
Sonia Bluhm
Guy Barnett
author_sort Brenda B. Lin
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Australia's first National Climate Risk Assessment is built on the latest science as well as learnings from other countries’ national risk assessments. The goal of the risk assessment was to identify the priority risks of climate change to Australia as a nation. Due to timeline obligations, this process needed to be completed in 4 months, a considerably shorter timeframe than other national climate risk assessments. In this paper, the authors share learnings from the process of implementing the first pass of Australia's National Climate Risk Assessment, which brought together more than 240 stakeholders across eight systems to co‐develop a set of national priority risks. These learnings are used to provide recommendations and advice for working at the national scale and within short timeframes. First, a rapid climate risk assessment can bring together a significant diversity and range of stakeholders to engage in a national process and provide a broad perspective of the priorities that should be pursued. Second, the design of the process can provide multiple opportunities to iterate through drafts of risks in rapid succession. Third, bringing stakeholders into discussion across systems can increase understanding of how risks are connected and how future work could be pursued across systems for more effective risk management and adaptation planning. Our learnings help inform how future climate risk assessments can embrace the complexity of systemic risks and highlight the importance of building stakeholder networks to support both the risk assessment process and the adaptation work that follows.
format Article
id doaj-art-61ceb9826e7342d2b83afdd6f701a741
institution Kabale University
issn 2692-4587
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Climate Resilience and Sustainability
spelling doaj-art-61ceb9826e7342d2b83afdd6f701a7412025-08-20T03:29:22ZengWileyClimate Resilience and Sustainability2692-45872025-06-0141n/an/a10.1002/cli2.70004Learnings From the Co‐Development of Priority Risks in Australia's First National Climate Risk AssessmentBrenda B. Lin0Aysha Fleming1Lygia Romanach2Fanny A. Boulaire3Tim Capon4Murni Po5Stephen Cook6Rebecca Darbyshire7Sonia Bluhm8Guy Barnett9CSIRO Environment Dutton Park Queensland AustraliaCSIRO Environment Hobart Tasmania AustraliaCSIRO Environment Dutton Park Queensland AustraliaCSIRO Environment Dutton Park Queensland AustraliaCSIRO Environment Black Mountain Australian Capital Territory AustraliaCSIRO Environment Black Mountain Australian Capital Territory AustraliaCSIRO Environment Darwin Northern Territory AustraliaCSIRO Agriculture and Food Black Mountain Australian Capital Territory AustraliaScientell Pty Ltd Melbourne Victoria AustraliaCSIRO Environment Black Mountain Australian Capital Territory AustraliaABSTRACT Australia's first National Climate Risk Assessment is built on the latest science as well as learnings from other countries’ national risk assessments. The goal of the risk assessment was to identify the priority risks of climate change to Australia as a nation. Due to timeline obligations, this process needed to be completed in 4 months, a considerably shorter timeframe than other national climate risk assessments. In this paper, the authors share learnings from the process of implementing the first pass of Australia's National Climate Risk Assessment, which brought together more than 240 stakeholders across eight systems to co‐develop a set of national priority risks. These learnings are used to provide recommendations and advice for working at the national scale and within short timeframes. First, a rapid climate risk assessment can bring together a significant diversity and range of stakeholders to engage in a national process and provide a broad perspective of the priorities that should be pursued. Second, the design of the process can provide multiple opportunities to iterate through drafts of risks in rapid succession. Third, bringing stakeholders into discussion across systems can increase understanding of how risks are connected and how future work could be pursued across systems for more effective risk management and adaptation planning. Our learnings help inform how future climate risk assessments can embrace the complexity of systemic risks and highlight the importance of building stakeholder networks to support both the risk assessment process and the adaptation work that follows.https://doi.org/10.1002/cli2.70004climate risk assessmentco‐developmentcomplex systemsregional climate variationstakeholder engagementsystems analysis
spellingShingle Brenda B. Lin
Aysha Fleming
Lygia Romanach
Fanny A. Boulaire
Tim Capon
Murni Po
Stephen Cook
Rebecca Darbyshire
Sonia Bluhm
Guy Barnett
Learnings From the Co‐Development of Priority Risks in Australia's First National Climate Risk Assessment
Climate Resilience and Sustainability
climate risk assessment
co‐development
complex systems
regional climate variation
stakeholder engagement
systems analysis
title Learnings From the Co‐Development of Priority Risks in Australia's First National Climate Risk Assessment
title_full Learnings From the Co‐Development of Priority Risks in Australia's First National Climate Risk Assessment
title_fullStr Learnings From the Co‐Development of Priority Risks in Australia's First National Climate Risk Assessment
title_full_unstemmed Learnings From the Co‐Development of Priority Risks in Australia's First National Climate Risk Assessment
title_short Learnings From the Co‐Development of Priority Risks in Australia's First National Climate Risk Assessment
title_sort learnings from the co development of priority risks in australia s first national climate risk assessment
topic climate risk assessment
co‐development
complex systems
regional climate variation
stakeholder engagement
systems analysis
url https://doi.org/10.1002/cli2.70004
work_keys_str_mv AT brendablin learningsfromthecodevelopmentofpriorityrisksinaustraliasfirstnationalclimateriskassessment
AT ayshafleming learningsfromthecodevelopmentofpriorityrisksinaustraliasfirstnationalclimateriskassessment
AT lygiaromanach learningsfromthecodevelopmentofpriorityrisksinaustraliasfirstnationalclimateriskassessment
AT fannyaboulaire learningsfromthecodevelopmentofpriorityrisksinaustraliasfirstnationalclimateriskassessment
AT timcapon learningsfromthecodevelopmentofpriorityrisksinaustraliasfirstnationalclimateriskassessment
AT murnipo learningsfromthecodevelopmentofpriorityrisksinaustraliasfirstnationalclimateriskassessment
AT stephencook learningsfromthecodevelopmentofpriorityrisksinaustraliasfirstnationalclimateriskassessment
AT rebeccadarbyshire learningsfromthecodevelopmentofpriorityrisksinaustraliasfirstnationalclimateriskassessment
AT soniabluhm learningsfromthecodevelopmentofpriorityrisksinaustraliasfirstnationalclimateriskassessment
AT guybarnett learningsfromthecodevelopmentofpriorityrisksinaustraliasfirstnationalclimateriskassessment