Comparison of short-term oncologic outcomes in open, laparoscopic and robotic radical gastrectomy for the treatment of gastric cancer

Aim: Surgical resection remains the cornerstone treatment for gastric cancer, which ranks as the fifth most common cancer globally. Although minimally invasive surgical techniques are gaining popularity, their safety and oncological adequacy remain subjects of ongoing debate. This study aims to cont...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sibel Yaman, Zafer Teke, Sercan Yüksel, Ugur Topal, Hüseyin Karatay, Hürü Ceren Gökduman, Erdal Karaköse, Hasan Bektaş
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2025-07-01
Series:Journal of Minimal Access Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jmas.jmas_254_24
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849404751432646656
author Sibel Yaman
Zafer Teke
Sercan Yüksel
Ugur Topal
Hüseyin Karatay
Hürü Ceren Gökduman
Erdal Karaköse
Hasan Bektaş
author_facet Sibel Yaman
Zafer Teke
Sercan Yüksel
Ugur Topal
Hüseyin Karatay
Hürü Ceren Gökduman
Erdal Karaköse
Hasan Bektaş
author_sort Sibel Yaman
collection DOAJ
description Aim: Surgical resection remains the cornerstone treatment for gastric cancer, which ranks as the fifth most common cancer globally. Although minimally invasive surgical techniques are gaining popularity, their safety and oncological adequacy remain subjects of ongoing debate. This study aims to contribute to the medical literature by comparing open, laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomy techniques in the treatment of gastric cancer, focusing on short-term oncological outcomes. Materials and Methods: Patients aged 18 years and older who underwent surgery for gastric adenocarcinoma at our institution between April 2020 and September 2022 were included in the study. The patients were categorised into three groups based on the surgical approach: open gastrectomy, laparoscopic gastrectomy and robotic gastrectomy. Demographic data, intraoperative and post-operative findings, tumour characteristics and short-term morbidity and mortality outcomes were analysed retrospectively. Results: A total of 109 patients (37 females [33.9%] and 72 males [66.1%]) with a mean age of 63.1 ± 11.4 years were included. The operative time was significantly shorter in the open gastrectomy group compared to the laparoscopic and robotic groups (P = 0.012). The initiation of oral intake and post-operative hospital stay were significantly shorter in the robotic gastrectomy group (P < 0.001). At 1-year follow-up, disease-free survival rates were higher, and mortality rates were lower in the robotic gastrectomy group compared to the other groups (P = 0.030). Furthermore, the completion rate of adjuvant therapy was significantly higher in the robotic group than in the other groups (P = 0.008). Conclusion: In conclusion, minimally invasive surgical techniques, particularly robotic gastrectomy, provide a safe and oncologically adequate alternative to open surgery for the treatment of gastric cancer. These methods can be safely employed in selected patients by experienced teams at high-volume centres.
format Article
id doaj-art-61857f4279d347099e364da4e4208c2f
institution Kabale University
issn 0972-9941
1998-3921
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Minimal Access Surgery
spelling doaj-art-61857f4279d347099e364da4e4208c2f2025-08-20T03:36:53ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Minimal Access Surgery0972-99411998-39212025-07-0121325626410.4103/jmas.jmas_254_24Comparison of short-term oncologic outcomes in open, laparoscopic and robotic radical gastrectomy for the treatment of gastric cancerSibel YamanZafer TekeSercan YükselUgur TopalHüseyin KaratayHürü Ceren GökdumanErdal KaraköseHasan BektaşAim: Surgical resection remains the cornerstone treatment for gastric cancer, which ranks as the fifth most common cancer globally. Although minimally invasive surgical techniques are gaining popularity, their safety and oncological adequacy remain subjects of ongoing debate. This study aims to contribute to the medical literature by comparing open, laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomy techniques in the treatment of gastric cancer, focusing on short-term oncological outcomes. Materials and Methods: Patients aged 18 years and older who underwent surgery for gastric adenocarcinoma at our institution between April 2020 and September 2022 were included in the study. The patients were categorised into three groups based on the surgical approach: open gastrectomy, laparoscopic gastrectomy and robotic gastrectomy. Demographic data, intraoperative and post-operative findings, tumour characteristics and short-term morbidity and mortality outcomes were analysed retrospectively. Results: A total of 109 patients (37 females [33.9%] and 72 males [66.1%]) with a mean age of 63.1 ± 11.4 years were included. The operative time was significantly shorter in the open gastrectomy group compared to the laparoscopic and robotic groups (P = 0.012). The initiation of oral intake and post-operative hospital stay were significantly shorter in the robotic gastrectomy group (P < 0.001). At 1-year follow-up, disease-free survival rates were higher, and mortality rates were lower in the robotic gastrectomy group compared to the other groups (P = 0.030). Furthermore, the completion rate of adjuvant therapy was significantly higher in the robotic group than in the other groups (P = 0.008). Conclusion: In conclusion, minimally invasive surgical techniques, particularly robotic gastrectomy, provide a safe and oncologically adequate alternative to open surgery for the treatment of gastric cancer. These methods can be safely employed in selected patients by experienced teams at high-volume centres.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jmas.jmas_254_24gastrectomygastric cancerlaparoscopyrobotic surgery
spellingShingle Sibel Yaman
Zafer Teke
Sercan Yüksel
Ugur Topal
Hüseyin Karatay
Hürü Ceren Gökduman
Erdal Karaköse
Hasan Bektaş
Comparison of short-term oncologic outcomes in open, laparoscopic and robotic radical gastrectomy for the treatment of gastric cancer
Journal of Minimal Access Surgery
gastrectomy
gastric cancer
laparoscopy
robotic surgery
title Comparison of short-term oncologic outcomes in open, laparoscopic and robotic radical gastrectomy for the treatment of gastric cancer
title_full Comparison of short-term oncologic outcomes in open, laparoscopic and robotic radical gastrectomy for the treatment of gastric cancer
title_fullStr Comparison of short-term oncologic outcomes in open, laparoscopic and robotic radical gastrectomy for the treatment of gastric cancer
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of short-term oncologic outcomes in open, laparoscopic and robotic radical gastrectomy for the treatment of gastric cancer
title_short Comparison of short-term oncologic outcomes in open, laparoscopic and robotic radical gastrectomy for the treatment of gastric cancer
title_sort comparison of short term oncologic outcomes in open laparoscopic and robotic radical gastrectomy for the treatment of gastric cancer
topic gastrectomy
gastric cancer
laparoscopy
robotic surgery
url https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jmas.jmas_254_24
work_keys_str_mv AT sibelyaman comparisonofshorttermoncologicoutcomesinopenlaparoscopicandroboticradicalgastrectomyforthetreatmentofgastriccancer
AT zaferteke comparisonofshorttermoncologicoutcomesinopenlaparoscopicandroboticradicalgastrectomyforthetreatmentofgastriccancer
AT sercanyuksel comparisonofshorttermoncologicoutcomesinopenlaparoscopicandroboticradicalgastrectomyforthetreatmentofgastriccancer
AT ugurtopal comparisonofshorttermoncologicoutcomesinopenlaparoscopicandroboticradicalgastrectomyforthetreatmentofgastriccancer
AT huseyinkaratay comparisonofshorttermoncologicoutcomesinopenlaparoscopicandroboticradicalgastrectomyforthetreatmentofgastriccancer
AT hurucerengokduman comparisonofshorttermoncologicoutcomesinopenlaparoscopicandroboticradicalgastrectomyforthetreatmentofgastriccancer
AT erdalkarakose comparisonofshorttermoncologicoutcomesinopenlaparoscopicandroboticradicalgastrectomyforthetreatmentofgastriccancer
AT hasanbektas comparisonofshorttermoncologicoutcomesinopenlaparoscopicandroboticradicalgastrectomyforthetreatmentofgastriccancer