Technical Quality of Contemporary Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: An Assessment by Study of Anatomical Features Needing Attention at Revision Surgery

Although technical causes of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) failure have long been reported, we were curious about the quality of contemporary sinus surgery. The electronic health database of Mayo Clinic, Arizona was scrutinized to identify adult patients with diffuse chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) wh...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nitish Kumar, Pedro Lanca Gomes, Michael J. Marino, Amar Miglani, Devyani Lal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-08-01
Series:Sinusitis
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2673-351X/8/2/5
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850239163933130752
author Nitish Kumar
Pedro Lanca Gomes
Michael J. Marino
Amar Miglani
Devyani Lal
author_facet Nitish Kumar
Pedro Lanca Gomes
Michael J. Marino
Amar Miglani
Devyani Lal
author_sort Nitish Kumar
collection DOAJ
description Although technical causes of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) failure have long been reported, we were curious about the quality of contemporary sinus surgery. The electronic health database of Mayo Clinic, Arizona was scrutinized to identify adult patients with diffuse chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) who underwent revision ESS between January 2019 and September 2023 with a history of bilateral full-house ESS. Anatomical features on preoperative radiology and intraoperative endoscopy were cataloged: residual uncinate tissue, maxillary antrostomy with a non-incorporated natural os, residual ethmoidal septations (three septations > 3 mm), and inadequate sphenoid osteotomy (os size < 6 mm). Sixty-nine subjects were identified. A deviated nasal septum was present in 53.6%. Residual uncinate tissue was noted in 50.7% of patients associated with missed natural maxillary os in 39.13% of antrostomies. An inadequate os diameter was noted in 63.8% of sphenoidotomies. Significant residual septations were seen in posterior ethmoidal cells in 66.7% and anterior ethmoidal cells in 62.3% of patients. Residual frontoethmoidal cells were noted in 72.4% of patients. Although the extent of ESS must be individualized, a high prevalence of features reflecting suboptimal surgery that could limit the success of ESS was identified. These findings merit further consideration for focused training during residency and continuous professional development activities.
format Article
id doaj-art-6181179cbb1c46fb88ca2749f400da39
institution OA Journals
issn 2673-351X
language English
publishDate 2024-08-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Sinusitis
spelling doaj-art-6181179cbb1c46fb88ca2749f400da392025-08-20T02:01:14ZengMDPI AGSinusitis2673-351X2024-08-0182283610.3390/sinusitis8020005Technical Quality of Contemporary Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: An Assessment by Study of Anatomical Features Needing Attention at Revision SurgeryNitish Kumar0Pedro Lanca Gomes1Michael J. Marino2Amar Miglani3Devyani Lal4Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USADepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USADepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USADepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USADepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USAAlthough technical causes of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) failure have long been reported, we were curious about the quality of contemporary sinus surgery. The electronic health database of Mayo Clinic, Arizona was scrutinized to identify adult patients with diffuse chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) who underwent revision ESS between January 2019 and September 2023 with a history of bilateral full-house ESS. Anatomical features on preoperative radiology and intraoperative endoscopy were cataloged: residual uncinate tissue, maxillary antrostomy with a non-incorporated natural os, residual ethmoidal septations (three septations > 3 mm), and inadequate sphenoid osteotomy (os size < 6 mm). Sixty-nine subjects were identified. A deviated nasal septum was present in 53.6%. Residual uncinate tissue was noted in 50.7% of patients associated with missed natural maxillary os in 39.13% of antrostomies. An inadequate os diameter was noted in 63.8% of sphenoidotomies. Significant residual septations were seen in posterior ethmoidal cells in 66.7% and anterior ethmoidal cells in 62.3% of patients. Residual frontoethmoidal cells were noted in 72.4% of patients. Although the extent of ESS must be individualized, a high prevalence of features reflecting suboptimal surgery that could limit the success of ESS was identified. These findings merit further consideration for focused training during residency and continuous professional development activities.https://www.mdpi.com/2673-351X/8/2/5chronic rhinosinusitisendoscopic sinus surgeryrevision surgery
spellingShingle Nitish Kumar
Pedro Lanca Gomes
Michael J. Marino
Amar Miglani
Devyani Lal
Technical Quality of Contemporary Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: An Assessment by Study of Anatomical Features Needing Attention at Revision Surgery
Sinusitis
chronic rhinosinusitis
endoscopic sinus surgery
revision surgery
title Technical Quality of Contemporary Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: An Assessment by Study of Anatomical Features Needing Attention at Revision Surgery
title_full Technical Quality of Contemporary Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: An Assessment by Study of Anatomical Features Needing Attention at Revision Surgery
title_fullStr Technical Quality of Contemporary Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: An Assessment by Study of Anatomical Features Needing Attention at Revision Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Technical Quality of Contemporary Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: An Assessment by Study of Anatomical Features Needing Attention at Revision Surgery
title_short Technical Quality of Contemporary Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: An Assessment by Study of Anatomical Features Needing Attention at Revision Surgery
title_sort technical quality of contemporary endoscopic sinus surgery an assessment by study of anatomical features needing attention at revision surgery
topic chronic rhinosinusitis
endoscopic sinus surgery
revision surgery
url https://www.mdpi.com/2673-351X/8/2/5
work_keys_str_mv AT nitishkumar technicalqualityofcontemporaryendoscopicsinussurgeryanassessmentbystudyofanatomicalfeaturesneedingattentionatrevisionsurgery
AT pedrolancagomes technicalqualityofcontemporaryendoscopicsinussurgeryanassessmentbystudyofanatomicalfeaturesneedingattentionatrevisionsurgery
AT michaeljmarino technicalqualityofcontemporaryendoscopicsinussurgeryanassessmentbystudyofanatomicalfeaturesneedingattentionatrevisionsurgery
AT amarmiglani technicalqualityofcontemporaryendoscopicsinussurgeryanassessmentbystudyofanatomicalfeaturesneedingattentionatrevisionsurgery
AT devyanilal technicalqualityofcontemporaryendoscopicsinussurgeryanassessmentbystudyofanatomicalfeaturesneedingattentionatrevisionsurgery