Scientists’ Perspectives on the Demarcation Problem
The demarcation problem, concerning the establishment of a specific criterion for distinguishing science from non-science or pseudoscience, stands as one of the central issues in the philosophy of science. Considering the extant body of literature, philosophers, particularly those specializing in th...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
Istanbul University Press
2023-12-01
|
| Series: | Felsefe Arkivi |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/AEF0EA762F6145C4A399EF752E5A9AA5 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849721797896830976 |
|---|---|
| author | Mustafa Efe Ateş Mehmet İnce Cenk Barın Bora |
| author_facet | Mustafa Efe Ateş Mehmet İnce Cenk Barın Bora |
| author_sort | Mustafa Efe Ateş |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The demarcation problem, concerning the establishment of a specific criterion for distinguishing science from non-science or pseudoscience, stands as one of the central issues in the philosophy of science. Considering the extant body of literature, philosophers, particularly those specializing in the philosophy of science, gain insight into the nature of science through logical language analysis and/or historical examination. In doing so, they aim to demarcate science from other pursuits. Nevertheless, this paper takes a distinct approach, diverging from the conventional viewpoint of philosophers and instead adopting the perspective of scientists. To achieve this, we conducted a series of qualitative interviews involving 30 scientists, each of whom holds a professorship in their respective fields. By conducting these interviews, we aimed to reveal the scientists’ perspectives on the demarcation problem and then evaluate their viewpoints. Following the evaluation of these perspectives, three key findings became evident. First, a significant majority of the responses obtained regarding the demarcation problem align well with prevailing philosophical views found in the existing literature. The responses that closely match the dominant philosophical approaches have been highlighted in the article’s thematic sections. Second, a lack of consensus also exists among scientists regarding the demarcation problem, similar to the lack of consensus among philosophers. However, despite this absence of agreement, a balance appears to exist between different conflicting viewpoints among scientists. Third and finally, scientists generally lack strong familiarity with the fundamental philosophical issues related to the demarcation problem. Although this finding relies on non-quantitative measures, detailed analysis supports this conclusion. Based on these findings, we conclude that adopting different approaches to conducting interviews could lead to more nuanced outcomes. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-616adb1c19da49b09771b02c60154158 |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 2667-7644 |
| language | deu |
| publishDate | 2023-12-01 |
| publisher | Istanbul University Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Felsefe Arkivi |
| spelling | doaj-art-616adb1c19da49b09771b02c601541582025-08-20T03:11:32ZdeuIstanbul University PressFelsefe Arkivi2667-76442023-12-0159567710.26650/arcp.1381405123456Scientists’ Perspectives on the Demarcation ProblemMustafa Efe Ateş0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8927-6884Mehmet İnce1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4690-668XCenk Barın Bora2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2328-2277Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesi, Mugla, TurkiyeMuğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesi, Mugla, TurkiyeMuğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesi, Mugla, TurkiyeThe demarcation problem, concerning the establishment of a specific criterion for distinguishing science from non-science or pseudoscience, stands as one of the central issues in the philosophy of science. Considering the extant body of literature, philosophers, particularly those specializing in the philosophy of science, gain insight into the nature of science through logical language analysis and/or historical examination. In doing so, they aim to demarcate science from other pursuits. Nevertheless, this paper takes a distinct approach, diverging from the conventional viewpoint of philosophers and instead adopting the perspective of scientists. To achieve this, we conducted a series of qualitative interviews involving 30 scientists, each of whom holds a professorship in their respective fields. By conducting these interviews, we aimed to reveal the scientists’ perspectives on the demarcation problem and then evaluate their viewpoints. Following the evaluation of these perspectives, three key findings became evident. First, a significant majority of the responses obtained regarding the demarcation problem align well with prevailing philosophical views found in the existing literature. The responses that closely match the dominant philosophical approaches have been highlighted in the article’s thematic sections. Second, a lack of consensus also exists among scientists regarding the demarcation problem, similar to the lack of consensus among philosophers. However, despite this absence of agreement, a balance appears to exist between different conflicting viewpoints among scientists. Third and finally, scientists generally lack strong familiarity with the fundamental philosophical issues related to the demarcation problem. Although this finding relies on non-quantitative measures, detailed analysis supports this conclusion. Based on these findings, we conclude that adopting different approaches to conducting interviews could lead to more nuanced outcomes.https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/AEF0EA762F6145C4A399EF752E5A9AA5demarcation problemphilosophy of sciencepseudosciencenon-scientific activitiesscientific community |
| spellingShingle | Mustafa Efe Ateş Mehmet İnce Cenk Barın Bora Scientists’ Perspectives on the Demarcation Problem Felsefe Arkivi demarcation problem philosophy of science pseudoscience non-scientific activities scientific community |
| title | Scientists’ Perspectives on the Demarcation Problem |
| title_full | Scientists’ Perspectives on the Demarcation Problem |
| title_fullStr | Scientists’ Perspectives on the Demarcation Problem |
| title_full_unstemmed | Scientists’ Perspectives on the Demarcation Problem |
| title_short | Scientists’ Perspectives on the Demarcation Problem |
| title_sort | scientists perspectives on the demarcation problem |
| topic | demarcation problem philosophy of science pseudoscience non-scientific activities scientific community |
| url | https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/AEF0EA762F6145C4A399EF752E5A9AA5 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mustafaefeates scientistsperspectivesonthedemarcationproblem AT mehmetince scientistsperspectivesonthedemarcationproblem AT cenkbarınbora scientistsperspectivesonthedemarcationproblem |