Preparation and quality evaluation of mixed fruit jam made from natural and artificial sweetener

Abstract In this study nutritionally enriched apple and date jam was developed by replacing sugar with natural and artificial sweeteners stevia and sorbitol. Three different types of samples were prepared. Sample T1 was prepared by using stevia as a sweetener agent. Sample T2 was prepared by using s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Muhammad Haroon, Imran Khan, Afaf Ejaz, Muhammad Afzaal, Farhan Saeed, Muhammad Umar Farooq, Maryam Ehsan, Faiyaz Ahmed, Noor Akram, Gebremichael Gebremedhin Hailu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-12-01
Series:eFood
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/efd2.70022
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850064108977651712
author Muhammad Haroon
Imran Khan
Afaf Ejaz
Muhammad Afzaal
Farhan Saeed
Muhammad Umar Farooq
Maryam Ehsan
Faiyaz Ahmed
Noor Akram
Gebremichael Gebremedhin Hailu
author_facet Muhammad Haroon
Imran Khan
Afaf Ejaz
Muhammad Afzaal
Farhan Saeed
Muhammad Umar Farooq
Maryam Ehsan
Faiyaz Ahmed
Noor Akram
Gebremichael Gebremedhin Hailu
author_sort Muhammad Haroon
collection DOAJ
description Abstract In this study nutritionally enriched apple and date jam was developed by replacing sugar with natural and artificial sweeteners stevia and sorbitol. Three different types of samples were prepared. Sample T1 was prepared by using stevia as a sweetener agent. Sample T2 was prepared by using sorbitol as a sweetener agent. Sample T3 was prepared by using a mixture of stevia and sorbitol as sweetener agents. Standard apple jam was used as a control sample labeled as T4 and was used for comparison analysis. The developed product was analyzed by physiochemical analysis and sensory evaluation. Microbial analysis was done to study the shelf life study of the developed product. The study showed that stevia and sorbitol could be used for jam preparation. Sample T3 also showed intermediate values of acidity and pH as 4.14 and 1.90, respectively, moreover, total soluble solids (TSS) was observed as 65.16 °Brix, T3 also showed an intermediate level of energy values. Sample T3 having sorbitol and stevia sweetener agents had the highest rate of overall acceptability. Storage studies of all samples show that with the passage of time all sensory characteristics of all treatments decreased.
format Article
id doaj-art-614fc045b25d44df8f0bf4ad7be9cfd6
institution DOAJ
issn 2666-3066
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series eFood
spelling doaj-art-614fc045b25d44df8f0bf4ad7be9cfd62025-08-20T02:49:23ZengWileyeFood2666-30662024-12-0156n/an/a10.1002/efd2.70022Preparation and quality evaluation of mixed fruit jam made from natural and artificial sweetenerMuhammad Haroon0Imran Khan1Afaf Ejaz2Muhammad Afzaal3Farhan Saeed4Muhammad Umar Farooq5Maryam Ehsan6Faiyaz Ahmed7Noor Akram8Gebremichael Gebremedhin Hailu9Department of Food Science and Technology University of Haripur Khyber Pakhtunkhwa PakistanDepartment of Food Science and Technology University of Haripur Khyber Pakhtunkhwa PakistanDepartment of Food Science Government College University Faisalabad PakistanDepartment of Food Science Government College University Faisalabad PakistanDepartment of Food Science Government College University Faisalabad PakistanDepartment of Food Science Government College University Faisalabad PakistanDepartment of Food Science Government College University Faisalabad PakistanDepartment of Basic Health Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences Qassim University Buraydah Saudi ArabiaFood Safety & Biotechnology Lab, Department of Food Science Government College University Faisalabad PakistanFood Technology and Process Engineering Oda Bultum University Chiro EthiopiaAbstract In this study nutritionally enriched apple and date jam was developed by replacing sugar with natural and artificial sweeteners stevia and sorbitol. Three different types of samples were prepared. Sample T1 was prepared by using stevia as a sweetener agent. Sample T2 was prepared by using sorbitol as a sweetener agent. Sample T3 was prepared by using a mixture of stevia and sorbitol as sweetener agents. Standard apple jam was used as a control sample labeled as T4 and was used for comparison analysis. The developed product was analyzed by physiochemical analysis and sensory evaluation. Microbial analysis was done to study the shelf life study of the developed product. The study showed that stevia and sorbitol could be used for jam preparation. Sample T3 also showed intermediate values of acidity and pH as 4.14 and 1.90, respectively, moreover, total soluble solids (TSS) was observed as 65.16 °Brix, T3 also showed an intermediate level of energy values. Sample T3 having sorbitol and stevia sweetener agents had the highest rate of overall acceptability. Storage studies of all samples show that with the passage of time all sensory characteristics of all treatments decreased.https://doi.org/10.1002/efd2.70022developmentjamstevia and sorbitolsweeteners
spellingShingle Muhammad Haroon
Imran Khan
Afaf Ejaz
Muhammad Afzaal
Farhan Saeed
Muhammad Umar Farooq
Maryam Ehsan
Faiyaz Ahmed
Noor Akram
Gebremichael Gebremedhin Hailu
Preparation and quality evaluation of mixed fruit jam made from natural and artificial sweetener
eFood
development
jam
stevia and sorbitol
sweeteners
title Preparation and quality evaluation of mixed fruit jam made from natural and artificial sweetener
title_full Preparation and quality evaluation of mixed fruit jam made from natural and artificial sweetener
title_fullStr Preparation and quality evaluation of mixed fruit jam made from natural and artificial sweetener
title_full_unstemmed Preparation and quality evaluation of mixed fruit jam made from natural and artificial sweetener
title_short Preparation and quality evaluation of mixed fruit jam made from natural and artificial sweetener
title_sort preparation and quality evaluation of mixed fruit jam made from natural and artificial sweetener
topic development
jam
stevia and sorbitol
sweeteners
url https://doi.org/10.1002/efd2.70022
work_keys_str_mv AT muhammadharoon preparationandqualityevaluationofmixedfruitjammadefromnaturalandartificialsweetener
AT imrankhan preparationandqualityevaluationofmixedfruitjammadefromnaturalandartificialsweetener
AT afafejaz preparationandqualityevaluationofmixedfruitjammadefromnaturalandartificialsweetener
AT muhammadafzaal preparationandqualityevaluationofmixedfruitjammadefromnaturalandartificialsweetener
AT farhansaeed preparationandqualityevaluationofmixedfruitjammadefromnaturalandartificialsweetener
AT muhammadumarfarooq preparationandqualityevaluationofmixedfruitjammadefromnaturalandartificialsweetener
AT maryamehsan preparationandqualityevaluationofmixedfruitjammadefromnaturalandartificialsweetener
AT faiyazahmed preparationandqualityevaluationofmixedfruitjammadefromnaturalandartificialsweetener
AT noorakram preparationandqualityevaluationofmixedfruitjammadefromnaturalandartificialsweetener
AT gebremichaelgebremedhinhailu preparationandqualityevaluationofmixedfruitjammadefromnaturalandartificialsweetener