Does washing insecticide-treated nets 20 times for experimental hut evaluations provide a suitable proxy for their end-of-life performance under household conditions?

Abstract Background Insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) are washed 20 times as part of experimental hut trials to simulate the loss of active ingredient (AI) occurring over their intended 3-year lifespan and estimate insecticidal durability. The ability of the 20-wash method to predict the end-of-life p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thomas Syme, Abel Agbevo, Josias Fagbohoun, Boris N’dombidjé, Judicael Nounagnon, Juniace Ahoga, Joël Akpi, Corine Ngufor
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-04-01
Series:Parasites & Vectors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-025-06743-w
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850139322204815360
author Thomas Syme
Abel Agbevo
Josias Fagbohoun
Boris N’dombidjé
Judicael Nounagnon
Juniace Ahoga
Joël Akpi
Corine Ngufor
author_facet Thomas Syme
Abel Agbevo
Josias Fagbohoun
Boris N’dombidjé
Judicael Nounagnon
Juniace Ahoga
Joël Akpi
Corine Ngufor
author_sort Thomas Syme
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) are washed 20 times as part of experimental hut trials to simulate the loss of active ingredient (AI) occurring over their intended 3-year lifespan and estimate insecticidal durability. The ability of the 20-wash method to predict the end-of-life performance of ITNs has not been empirically validated. Methods We performed an experimental hut trial to compare the efficacy of new ITNs unwashed and washed 20 times to field-aged ITNs withdrawn from households 3 years post-distribution against a pyrethroid-resistant vector population in Covè, Benin. Four products from pyrethroid-only (Interceptor®), pyrethroid-piperonyl butoxide (PermaNet® 3.0), pyrethroid-pyriproxyfen (Royal Guard®) and pyrethroid-chlorfenapyr (Interceptor® G2) ITN types were tested. Net pieces were tested in bioassays and sent for chemical analysis to assess differences in surface AI bioavailability and total chemical content between washed and field-aged nets. Susceptibility bioassays were also performed to assess insecticide resistance in the Covè vector population. Results Mosquito mortality in experimental huts was similar or slightly higher with field-aged nets than washed nets with Interceptor® (11% vs. 10%, p = 0.339, OR = 1.19, 95% CIs [0.84, 1.69]), PermaNet® 3.0 (12% vs. 18%, p < 0.001, OR = 1.78, 95% CIs [1.34, 2.38]) and Royal Guard® (9% vs. 14%, p = 0.076, OR = 1.33, 95% CIs: [0.97, 1.83]). Likewise, field-aged Royal Guard® induced a similar reduction in fertility to washed Royal Guard® (22% vs. 29%, p = 0.066). In contrast, mortality was significantly lower with field-aged nets Interceptor® G2 compared to washed nets (54% vs. 19%, p < 0.001, OR = 0.18, 95% CIs [0.14, 0.24]). Blood-feeding inhibition was higher with field-aged nets than washed nets across all ITN types. Retention of non-pyrethroid AIs was lower than for the pyrethroid, particularly with field-aged nets (PermaNet® 3.0 (roof): 25% vs. 68%, p < 0.001, Royal Guard®: 27% vs. 53%, p < 0.001, Interceptor® G2: 14% vs. 39%, p < 0.001). Conclusions In this setting, the 20-wash method provided a suitable proxy for the end-of-life killing and sterilising performance of Interceptor®, PermaNet® 3.0 and Royal Guard® in experimental huts. In contrast, washing overestimated the end-of-life performance of Interceptor® G2 for mortality and underestimated the personal protection of all field-aged ITNs. Graphical Abstract
format Article
id doaj-art-614d23bcbc0c4a8fbb0d58d0a56894dd
institution OA Journals
issn 1756-3305
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Parasites & Vectors
spelling doaj-art-614d23bcbc0c4a8fbb0d58d0a56894dd2025-08-20T02:30:20ZengBMCParasites & Vectors1756-33052025-04-0118111710.1186/s13071-025-06743-wDoes washing insecticide-treated nets 20 times for experimental hut evaluations provide a suitable proxy for their end-of-life performance under household conditions?Thomas Syme0Abel Agbevo1Josias Fagbohoun2Boris N’dombidjé3Judicael Nounagnon4Juniace Ahoga5Joël Akpi6Corine Ngufor7London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM)London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM)Centre de Recherches Entomologiques de Cotonou (CREC)Centre de Recherches Entomologiques de Cotonou (CREC)Centre de Recherches Entomologiques de Cotonou (CREC)Centre de Recherches Entomologiques de Cotonou (CREC)Centre de Recherches Entomologiques de Cotonou (CREC)London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM)Abstract Background Insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) are washed 20 times as part of experimental hut trials to simulate the loss of active ingredient (AI) occurring over their intended 3-year lifespan and estimate insecticidal durability. The ability of the 20-wash method to predict the end-of-life performance of ITNs has not been empirically validated. Methods We performed an experimental hut trial to compare the efficacy of new ITNs unwashed and washed 20 times to field-aged ITNs withdrawn from households 3 years post-distribution against a pyrethroid-resistant vector population in Covè, Benin. Four products from pyrethroid-only (Interceptor®), pyrethroid-piperonyl butoxide (PermaNet® 3.0), pyrethroid-pyriproxyfen (Royal Guard®) and pyrethroid-chlorfenapyr (Interceptor® G2) ITN types were tested. Net pieces were tested in bioassays and sent for chemical analysis to assess differences in surface AI bioavailability and total chemical content between washed and field-aged nets. Susceptibility bioassays were also performed to assess insecticide resistance in the Covè vector population. Results Mosquito mortality in experimental huts was similar or slightly higher with field-aged nets than washed nets with Interceptor® (11% vs. 10%, p = 0.339, OR = 1.19, 95% CIs [0.84, 1.69]), PermaNet® 3.0 (12% vs. 18%, p < 0.001, OR = 1.78, 95% CIs [1.34, 2.38]) and Royal Guard® (9% vs. 14%, p = 0.076, OR = 1.33, 95% CIs: [0.97, 1.83]). Likewise, field-aged Royal Guard® induced a similar reduction in fertility to washed Royal Guard® (22% vs. 29%, p = 0.066). In contrast, mortality was significantly lower with field-aged nets Interceptor® G2 compared to washed nets (54% vs. 19%, p < 0.001, OR = 0.18, 95% CIs [0.14, 0.24]). Blood-feeding inhibition was higher with field-aged nets than washed nets across all ITN types. Retention of non-pyrethroid AIs was lower than for the pyrethroid, particularly with field-aged nets (PermaNet® 3.0 (roof): 25% vs. 68%, p < 0.001, Royal Guard®: 27% vs. 53%, p < 0.001, Interceptor® G2: 14% vs. 39%, p < 0.001). Conclusions In this setting, the 20-wash method provided a suitable proxy for the end-of-life killing and sterilising performance of Interceptor®, PermaNet® 3.0 and Royal Guard® in experimental huts. In contrast, washing overestimated the end-of-life performance of Interceptor® G2 for mortality and underestimated the personal protection of all field-aged ITNs. Graphical Abstracthttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-025-06743-wInsecticide-treated netsLong-lasting insecticidal netsMalariaVector controlMosquitoes
spellingShingle Thomas Syme
Abel Agbevo
Josias Fagbohoun
Boris N’dombidjé
Judicael Nounagnon
Juniace Ahoga
Joël Akpi
Corine Ngufor
Does washing insecticide-treated nets 20 times for experimental hut evaluations provide a suitable proxy for their end-of-life performance under household conditions?
Parasites & Vectors
Insecticide-treated nets
Long-lasting insecticidal nets
Malaria
Vector control
Mosquitoes
title Does washing insecticide-treated nets 20 times for experimental hut evaluations provide a suitable proxy for their end-of-life performance under household conditions?
title_full Does washing insecticide-treated nets 20 times for experimental hut evaluations provide a suitable proxy for their end-of-life performance under household conditions?
title_fullStr Does washing insecticide-treated nets 20 times for experimental hut evaluations provide a suitable proxy for their end-of-life performance under household conditions?
title_full_unstemmed Does washing insecticide-treated nets 20 times for experimental hut evaluations provide a suitable proxy for their end-of-life performance under household conditions?
title_short Does washing insecticide-treated nets 20 times for experimental hut evaluations provide a suitable proxy for their end-of-life performance under household conditions?
title_sort does washing insecticide treated nets 20 times for experimental hut evaluations provide a suitable proxy for their end of life performance under household conditions
topic Insecticide-treated nets
Long-lasting insecticidal nets
Malaria
Vector control
Mosquitoes
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-025-06743-w
work_keys_str_mv AT thomassyme doeswashinginsecticidetreatednets20timesforexperimentalhutevaluationsprovideasuitableproxyfortheirendoflifeperformanceunderhouseholdconditions
AT abelagbevo doeswashinginsecticidetreatednets20timesforexperimentalhutevaluationsprovideasuitableproxyfortheirendoflifeperformanceunderhouseholdconditions
AT josiasfagbohoun doeswashinginsecticidetreatednets20timesforexperimentalhutevaluationsprovideasuitableproxyfortheirendoflifeperformanceunderhouseholdconditions
AT borisndombidje doeswashinginsecticidetreatednets20timesforexperimentalhutevaluationsprovideasuitableproxyfortheirendoflifeperformanceunderhouseholdconditions
AT judicaelnounagnon doeswashinginsecticidetreatednets20timesforexperimentalhutevaluationsprovideasuitableproxyfortheirendoflifeperformanceunderhouseholdconditions
AT juniaceahoga doeswashinginsecticidetreatednets20timesforexperimentalhutevaluationsprovideasuitableproxyfortheirendoflifeperformanceunderhouseholdconditions
AT joelakpi doeswashinginsecticidetreatednets20timesforexperimentalhutevaluationsprovideasuitableproxyfortheirendoflifeperformanceunderhouseholdconditions
AT corinengufor doeswashinginsecticidetreatednets20timesforexperimentalhutevaluationsprovideasuitableproxyfortheirendoflifeperformanceunderhouseholdconditions