Discriminating woody species assemblages from National Forest Inventory data based on phylogeny in Georgia

Abstract Classifications of forest vegetation types and characterization of related species assemblages are important analytical tools for mapping and diversity monitoring of forest communities. The discrimination of forest communities is often based on β‐diversity, which can be quantified via numer...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alexander Wellenbeck, Lutz Fehrmann, Hannes Feilhauer, Sebastian Schmidtlein, Bernhard Misof, Nils Hein
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-07-01
Series:Ecology and Evolution
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.11569
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850059695005368320
author Alexander Wellenbeck
Lutz Fehrmann
Hannes Feilhauer
Sebastian Schmidtlein
Bernhard Misof
Nils Hein
author_facet Alexander Wellenbeck
Lutz Fehrmann
Hannes Feilhauer
Sebastian Schmidtlein
Bernhard Misof
Nils Hein
author_sort Alexander Wellenbeck
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Classifications of forest vegetation types and characterization of related species assemblages are important analytical tools for mapping and diversity monitoring of forest communities. The discrimination of forest communities is often based on β‐diversity, which can be quantified via numerous indices to derive compositional dissimilarity between samples. This study aims to evaluate the applicability of unsupervised classification for National Forest Inventory data from Georgia by comparing two cluster hierarchies. We calculated the mean basal area per hectare for each woody species across 1059 plot observations and quantified interspecies distances for all 87 species. Following an unspuervised cluster analysis, we compared the results derived from the species‐neutral dissimilarity (Bray‐Curtis) with those based on the Discriminating Avalanche dissimilarity, which incorporates interspecies phylogenetic variation. Incorporating genetic variation in the dissimilarity quantification resulted in a more nuanced discrimination of woody species assemblages and increased cluster coherence. Favorable statistics include the total number of clusters (23 vs. 20), mean distance within clusters (0.773 vs. 0.343), and within sum of squares (344.13 vs. 112.92). Clusters derived from dissimilarities that account for genetic variation showed a more robust alignment with biogeographical units, such as elevation and known habitats. We demonstrate that the applicability of unsupervised classification of species assemblages to large‐scale forest inventory data strongly depends on the underlying quantification of dissimilarity. Our results indicate that by incorporating phylogenetic variation, a more precise classification aligned with biogeographic units is attained. This supports the concept that the genetic signal of species assemblages reflects biogeographical patterns and facilitates more precise analyses for mapping, monitoring, and management of forest diversity.
format Article
id doaj-art-61323e179e1443bc87aa29a9d9782fe2
institution DOAJ
issn 2045-7758
language English
publishDate 2024-07-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Ecology and Evolution
spelling doaj-art-61323e179e1443bc87aa29a9d9782fe22025-08-20T02:50:48ZengWileyEcology and Evolution2045-77582024-07-01147n/an/a10.1002/ece3.11569Discriminating woody species assemblages from National Forest Inventory data based on phylogeny in GeorgiaAlexander Wellenbeck0Lutz Fehrmann1Hannes Feilhauer2Sebastian Schmidtlein3Bernhard Misof4Nils Hein5Systematic Zoology University of Bonn Bonn GermanyForest Inventory and Remote Sensing University of Göttingen Göttingen GermanyRemote Sensing Centre for Earth System Research (RSC4Earth) Leipzig University Leipzig GermanyInstitute of Geography and Geoecology Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) Karlsruhe GermanySystematic Zoology University of Bonn Bonn GermanyLeibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change (LIB) Museum Koenig Bonn GermanyAbstract Classifications of forest vegetation types and characterization of related species assemblages are important analytical tools for mapping and diversity monitoring of forest communities. The discrimination of forest communities is often based on β‐diversity, which can be quantified via numerous indices to derive compositional dissimilarity between samples. This study aims to evaluate the applicability of unsupervised classification for National Forest Inventory data from Georgia by comparing two cluster hierarchies. We calculated the mean basal area per hectare for each woody species across 1059 plot observations and quantified interspecies distances for all 87 species. Following an unspuervised cluster analysis, we compared the results derived from the species‐neutral dissimilarity (Bray‐Curtis) with those based on the Discriminating Avalanche dissimilarity, which incorporates interspecies phylogenetic variation. Incorporating genetic variation in the dissimilarity quantification resulted in a more nuanced discrimination of woody species assemblages and increased cluster coherence. Favorable statistics include the total number of clusters (23 vs. 20), mean distance within clusters (0.773 vs. 0.343), and within sum of squares (344.13 vs. 112.92). Clusters derived from dissimilarities that account for genetic variation showed a more robust alignment with biogeographical units, such as elevation and known habitats. We demonstrate that the applicability of unsupervised classification of species assemblages to large‐scale forest inventory data strongly depends on the underlying quantification of dissimilarity. Our results indicate that by incorporating phylogenetic variation, a more precise classification aligned with biogeographic units is attained. This supports the concept that the genetic signal of species assemblages reflects biogeographical patterns and facilitates more precise analyses for mapping, monitoring, and management of forest diversity.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.11569beta diversitycommunity discriminationdissimilaritydiversity monitoringNational Forest Inventoryphylogeny
spellingShingle Alexander Wellenbeck
Lutz Fehrmann
Hannes Feilhauer
Sebastian Schmidtlein
Bernhard Misof
Nils Hein
Discriminating woody species assemblages from National Forest Inventory data based on phylogeny in Georgia
Ecology and Evolution
beta diversity
community discrimination
dissimilarity
diversity monitoring
National Forest Inventory
phylogeny
title Discriminating woody species assemblages from National Forest Inventory data based on phylogeny in Georgia
title_full Discriminating woody species assemblages from National Forest Inventory data based on phylogeny in Georgia
title_fullStr Discriminating woody species assemblages from National Forest Inventory data based on phylogeny in Georgia
title_full_unstemmed Discriminating woody species assemblages from National Forest Inventory data based on phylogeny in Georgia
title_short Discriminating woody species assemblages from National Forest Inventory data based on phylogeny in Georgia
title_sort discriminating woody species assemblages from national forest inventory data based on phylogeny in georgia
topic beta diversity
community discrimination
dissimilarity
diversity monitoring
National Forest Inventory
phylogeny
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.11569
work_keys_str_mv AT alexanderwellenbeck discriminatingwoodyspeciesassemblagesfromnationalforestinventorydatabasedonphylogenyingeorgia
AT lutzfehrmann discriminatingwoodyspeciesassemblagesfromnationalforestinventorydatabasedonphylogenyingeorgia
AT hannesfeilhauer discriminatingwoodyspeciesassemblagesfromnationalforestinventorydatabasedonphylogenyingeorgia
AT sebastianschmidtlein discriminatingwoodyspeciesassemblagesfromnationalforestinventorydatabasedonphylogenyingeorgia
AT bernhardmisof discriminatingwoodyspeciesassemblagesfromnationalforestinventorydatabasedonphylogenyingeorgia
AT nilshein discriminatingwoodyspeciesassemblagesfromnationalforestinventorydatabasedonphylogenyingeorgia