Complex Structures of Intermetallic Compounds Interpreted as Intergrowth of Segments of Simple Structures

By the end of 1982 more than 2000 structure types were known for intermetallic compounds (elements, binary and multicomponent alloys) according to «Pearson’s Handbook of Crystallographic Data for Intermetallic Phases». Restricting ourselves to the ternary lanthanoid-transition metal-silicides, germ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Erwin Parthé, Bernard A. Chabot, Karin Cenzual
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Swiss Chemical Society 1985-06-01
Series:CHIMIA
Online Access:https://www.chimia.ch/chimia/article/view/9662
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850170615127867392
author Erwin Parthé
Bernard A. Chabot
Karin Cenzual
author_facet Erwin Parthé
Bernard A. Chabot
Karin Cenzual
author_sort Erwin Parthé
collection DOAJ
description By the end of 1982 more than 2000 structure types were known for intermetallic compounds (elements, binary and multicomponent alloys) according to «Pearson’s Handbook of Crystallographic Data for Intermetallic Phases». Restricting ourselves to the ternary lanthanoid-transition metal-silicides, germanides, stannides, borides, aluminides, and gallides, we are still confronted with about 150 types, of which at least two thirds form new atom arrangements which cannot be considered ternary ordered derivatives of binary structure types. – There is always arbitrariness in attempting to describe any crystal structure for the reason that one should take into account the chemistry of the compound, its physical properties, and its geometrical relationships to other structures. This challenge is particularly difficult to overcome with intermetallic compounds because in this case the lack of information on the nature of the chemical bonding does not allow an easy understanding of their physical properties and leaves also a (too) large degree of freedom in their crystal-chemical interpretation. If, with particularly well-chosen compounds, we can improve our vision by wearing, for example, «von Schnering’s spectacles» which allow to discover clusters in any structure..., belonging to the category of cluster compounds, these do not provide a satisfactory view of the structures of pure intermetallics. For this class of compounds we need another kind of spectacles! – One of the most successful approaches to the problem consists in interpreting complex structures of intermetallic compounds as being built up from «building units», such as slabs, columns, or blocks, characteristic of simple structure types. As an example we shall show that some 30 of the structure types found with ternary lanthanoid alloys can be described as linear combinations of slabs derived from 6 simple structure types. On the whole, more than one third of all 150 structure types can be interpreted as an intergrowth of various simple structure segments. Structure series, which group structures containing segments derived from the same parent structures, can then be considered, and new structure types can be predicted, by imagining different combinations of segments. This provides a useful guideline for material scientists who are searching for new compounds with interesting physical properties such as superconductivity or magnetism.
format Article
id doaj-art-60ef464ce6a4494389ec09d5cae2830a
institution OA Journals
issn 0009-4293
2673-2424
language deu
publishDate 1985-06-01
publisher Swiss Chemical Society
record_format Article
series CHIMIA
spelling doaj-art-60ef464ce6a4494389ec09d5cae2830a2025-08-20T02:20:26ZdeuSwiss Chemical SocietyCHIMIA0009-42932673-24241985-06-0139610.2533/chimia.1985.164Complex Structures of Intermetallic Compounds Interpreted as Intergrowth of Segments of Simple StructuresErwin Parthé0Bernard A. Chabot1Karin Cenzual2Laboratoire de Cristallographie aux Rayons X, Université de Genève, 24 quai Ernest Ansermet, CH-1211 Genève 4Laboratoire de Cristallographie aux Rayons X, Université de Genève, 24 quai Ernest Ansermet, CH-1211 Genève 4Laboratoire de Cristallographie aux Rayons X, Université de Genève, 24 quai Ernest Ansermet, CH-1211 Genève 4 By the end of 1982 more than 2000 structure types were known for intermetallic compounds (elements, binary and multicomponent alloys) according to «Pearson’s Handbook of Crystallographic Data for Intermetallic Phases». Restricting ourselves to the ternary lanthanoid-transition metal-silicides, germanides, stannides, borides, aluminides, and gallides, we are still confronted with about 150 types, of which at least two thirds form new atom arrangements which cannot be considered ternary ordered derivatives of binary structure types. – There is always arbitrariness in attempting to describe any crystal structure for the reason that one should take into account the chemistry of the compound, its physical properties, and its geometrical relationships to other structures. This challenge is particularly difficult to overcome with intermetallic compounds because in this case the lack of information on the nature of the chemical bonding does not allow an easy understanding of their physical properties and leaves also a (too) large degree of freedom in their crystal-chemical interpretation. If, with particularly well-chosen compounds, we can improve our vision by wearing, for example, «von Schnering’s spectacles» which allow to discover clusters in any structure..., belonging to the category of cluster compounds, these do not provide a satisfactory view of the structures of pure intermetallics. For this class of compounds we need another kind of spectacles! – One of the most successful approaches to the problem consists in interpreting complex structures of intermetallic compounds as being built up from «building units», such as slabs, columns, or blocks, characteristic of simple structure types. As an example we shall show that some 30 of the structure types found with ternary lanthanoid alloys can be described as linear combinations of slabs derived from 6 simple structure types. On the whole, more than one third of all 150 structure types can be interpreted as an intergrowth of various simple structure segments. Structure series, which group structures containing segments derived from the same parent structures, can then be considered, and new structure types can be predicted, by imagining different combinations of segments. This provides a useful guideline for material scientists who are searching for new compounds with interesting physical properties such as superconductivity or magnetism. https://www.chimia.ch/chimia/article/view/9662
spellingShingle Erwin Parthé
Bernard A. Chabot
Karin Cenzual
Complex Structures of Intermetallic Compounds Interpreted as Intergrowth of Segments of Simple Structures
CHIMIA
title Complex Structures of Intermetallic Compounds Interpreted as Intergrowth of Segments of Simple Structures
title_full Complex Structures of Intermetallic Compounds Interpreted as Intergrowth of Segments of Simple Structures
title_fullStr Complex Structures of Intermetallic Compounds Interpreted as Intergrowth of Segments of Simple Structures
title_full_unstemmed Complex Structures of Intermetallic Compounds Interpreted as Intergrowth of Segments of Simple Structures
title_short Complex Structures of Intermetallic Compounds Interpreted as Intergrowth of Segments of Simple Structures
title_sort complex structures of intermetallic compounds interpreted as intergrowth of segments of simple structures
url https://www.chimia.ch/chimia/article/view/9662
work_keys_str_mv AT erwinparthe complexstructuresofintermetalliccompoundsinterpretedasintergrowthofsegmentsofsimplestructures
AT bernardachabot complexstructuresofintermetalliccompoundsinterpretedasintergrowthofsegmentsofsimplestructures
AT karincenzual complexstructuresofintermetalliccompoundsinterpretedasintergrowthofsegmentsofsimplestructures