Validation and assessment of the arabic psychological first aid scale among physicians, nurses, and counselors in Jordan

Abstract Background Psychological first aid (PFA) involves strategies to tackle problems that occur as a result of disasters. This study aimed to validate the Arabic version of PFA scale through validity (face, content, convergent, discriminant validity, and confirmatory factor analysis) and reliabi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Basma Eid Alshareef, Othman A. Alfuqaha, Ibraheem B. Maali, Khaled Amer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-02-01
Series:BMC Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02428-2
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823861470210818048
author Basma Eid Alshareef
Othman A. Alfuqaha
Ibraheem B. Maali
Khaled Amer
author_facet Basma Eid Alshareef
Othman A. Alfuqaha
Ibraheem B. Maali
Khaled Amer
author_sort Basma Eid Alshareef
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Psychological first aid (PFA) involves strategies to tackle problems that occur as a result of disasters. This study aimed to validate the Arabic version of PFA scale through validity (face, content, convergent, discriminant validity, and confirmatory factor analysis) and reliability (Cronbach’s alpha). Furthermore, it aimed to assess the perceived levels of knowledge, skills, and attitudes of PFA among healthcare providers (HCPs). Moreover, it determined the differences between HCPs based on their knowledge, skills, and attitudes of PFA. Methods A sample size of 389 HCPs (physicians = 68, nurses = 173, and counselors = 148) was conveniently selected to participate during the period of 10 December 2023 to 10 February 2024 after completing the translated PFA scale into the Arabic language. Descriptive, translation, validation process, and reliability were conducted. Results The translation process was satisfied. The content validity index was 0.91, yielding proper clarity of items. Three constructs were loaded with a total variation of 63.43%, indicating a proper model fit. The goodness-of-fit indices for the PFA model revealed that relative chi-square was 1.47, comparative fit index was 0.91, Tucker-Lewis index was 0.89, and the root mean square of error approximation was 0.046. Cronbach alpha values for knowledge, skills, and attitudes of PFA were 0.90, 0.89, 0.87, respectively. We found that counselors have more knowledge (64.4%), skills (73.4%), and attitudes (73.4%) compared to physicians and nurses. There are significant differences (p < 0.001) between the selected HCP groups, particularly for the counselors’ group in terms of knowledge, skills, and attitudes of PFA. Conclusions The Arabic PFA scale is valid and reliable among HCPs. The results highlight the emergent need to provide knowledge, skills, and attitudes of PFA interventions among medical professionals, particularly for physicians and nurses. The Arabic version of PFA helps all HCPs in Arab countries to assess, apply, and implement PFA interventions.
format Article
id doaj-art-60bb4645c8a545239f9c4eb361e214e2
institution Kabale University
issn 2050-7283
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Psychology
spelling doaj-art-60bb4645c8a545239f9c4eb361e214e22025-02-09T13:00:27ZengBMCBMC Psychology2050-72832025-02-011311910.1186/s40359-025-02428-2Validation and assessment of the arabic psychological first aid scale among physicians, nurses, and counselors in JordanBasma Eid Alshareef0Othman A. Alfuqaha1Ibraheem B. Maali2Khaled Amer3Department of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, AL-Ahliyya Amman UniversityCounseling and Mental Health Department, Faculty of Educational Sciences, The World Islamic Sciences & Education UniversityCounseling and Mental Health Department, Faculty of Educational Sciences, The World Islamic Sciences & Education UniversityDepartment of General Surgery, School of Medicine, The University of JordanAbstract Background Psychological first aid (PFA) involves strategies to tackle problems that occur as a result of disasters. This study aimed to validate the Arabic version of PFA scale through validity (face, content, convergent, discriminant validity, and confirmatory factor analysis) and reliability (Cronbach’s alpha). Furthermore, it aimed to assess the perceived levels of knowledge, skills, and attitudes of PFA among healthcare providers (HCPs). Moreover, it determined the differences between HCPs based on their knowledge, skills, and attitudes of PFA. Methods A sample size of 389 HCPs (physicians = 68, nurses = 173, and counselors = 148) was conveniently selected to participate during the period of 10 December 2023 to 10 February 2024 after completing the translated PFA scale into the Arabic language. Descriptive, translation, validation process, and reliability were conducted. Results The translation process was satisfied. The content validity index was 0.91, yielding proper clarity of items. Three constructs were loaded with a total variation of 63.43%, indicating a proper model fit. The goodness-of-fit indices for the PFA model revealed that relative chi-square was 1.47, comparative fit index was 0.91, Tucker-Lewis index was 0.89, and the root mean square of error approximation was 0.046. Cronbach alpha values for knowledge, skills, and attitudes of PFA were 0.90, 0.89, 0.87, respectively. We found that counselors have more knowledge (64.4%), skills (73.4%), and attitudes (73.4%) compared to physicians and nurses. There are significant differences (p < 0.001) between the selected HCP groups, particularly for the counselors’ group in terms of knowledge, skills, and attitudes of PFA. Conclusions The Arabic PFA scale is valid and reliable among HCPs. The results highlight the emergent need to provide knowledge, skills, and attitudes of PFA interventions among medical professionals, particularly for physicians and nurses. The Arabic version of PFA helps all HCPs in Arab countries to assess, apply, and implement PFA interventions.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02428-2Healthcare providersPsychological first aidReliabilityValidity
spellingShingle Basma Eid Alshareef
Othman A. Alfuqaha
Ibraheem B. Maali
Khaled Amer
Validation and assessment of the arabic psychological first aid scale among physicians, nurses, and counselors in Jordan
BMC Psychology
Healthcare providers
Psychological first aid
Reliability
Validity
title Validation and assessment of the arabic psychological first aid scale among physicians, nurses, and counselors in Jordan
title_full Validation and assessment of the arabic psychological first aid scale among physicians, nurses, and counselors in Jordan
title_fullStr Validation and assessment of the arabic psychological first aid scale among physicians, nurses, and counselors in Jordan
title_full_unstemmed Validation and assessment of the arabic psychological first aid scale among physicians, nurses, and counselors in Jordan
title_short Validation and assessment of the arabic psychological first aid scale among physicians, nurses, and counselors in Jordan
title_sort validation and assessment of the arabic psychological first aid scale among physicians nurses and counselors in jordan
topic Healthcare providers
Psychological first aid
Reliability
Validity
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02428-2
work_keys_str_mv AT basmaeidalshareef validationandassessmentofthearabicpsychologicalfirstaidscaleamongphysiciansnursesandcounselorsinjordan
AT othmanaalfuqaha validationandassessmentofthearabicpsychologicalfirstaidscaleamongphysiciansnursesandcounselorsinjordan
AT ibraheembmaali validationandassessmentofthearabicpsychologicalfirstaidscaleamongphysiciansnursesandcounselorsinjordan
AT khaledamer validationandassessmentofthearabicpsychologicalfirstaidscaleamongphysiciansnursesandcounselorsinjordan