HOW CLEAR ALIGNER PERFORMED IN TREATING CLASS I, II, III MALOCLUSION? A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY
Aim of the study: This research aims to evaluate the performance of clear aligners in treating Class I, Class II, and Class III malocclusion. Materials and methods: The study retrospectively assessed healthy adult patients treated orthodontically with clear aligners. Data analysis included descripti...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Romanian Society of Oral Rehabilitation
2025-06-01
|
| Series: | Romanian Journal of Oral Rehabilitation |
| Online Access: | https://rjor.ro/how-clear-aligner-performed-in-treating-class-i-ii-iii-maloclusion-a-retrospective-study/ |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849390256896344064 |
|---|---|
| author | Mohammed Barashi |
| author_facet | Mohammed Barashi |
| author_sort | Mohammed Barashi |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Aim of the study: This research aims to evaluate the performance of clear aligners in treating Class I, Class II, and Class III malocclusion. Materials and methods: The study retrospectively assessed healthy adult patients treated orthodontically with clear aligners. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and regression analyses to assess the relationships between Angle's classifications, spacing or crowding measurements, and the need for treatment refinement. Results: Participants comprised a total of 115 individuals, including a female majority (87.0%; n=100). The data presents the distribution of cases according to the Angle classification among the participants. Class I cases comprise the majority at 57.4% (n=66), followed by Class II at 27.8% (n=32), and Class III at 14.8% (n=17). The coefficient is 0.64, suggesting that individuals in Class III have a mean spacing or crowding at the end of treatment that is significantly greater than those in Class I, with a statistically significant p-value (<0.01; 95% CI: 0.29, 0.99). Conclusions: This study indicates that clear aligners might be more effective for treating Class I malocclusion, while Class II and III cases require more adjustments. Further research is necessary to understand the long-term effects of clear aligners and to optimize treatment strategies for different types of malocclusions.
|
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-6074f07d308d43d1bba05f963bb31138 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2066-7000 2601-4661 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-06-01 |
| publisher | Romanian Society of Oral Rehabilitation |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Romanian Journal of Oral Rehabilitation |
| spelling | doaj-art-6074f07d308d43d1bba05f963bb311382025-08-20T03:41:43ZengRomanian Society of Oral RehabilitationRomanian Journal of Oral Rehabilitation2066-70002601-46612025-06-0117260461010.62610/RJOR.2025.2.17.54HOW CLEAR ALIGNER PERFORMED IN TREATING CLASS I, II, III MALOCLUSION? A RETROSPECTIVE STUDYMohammed Barashi 0Orthodontic Division, Preventive Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi ArabiaAim of the study: This research aims to evaluate the performance of clear aligners in treating Class I, Class II, and Class III malocclusion. Materials and methods: The study retrospectively assessed healthy adult patients treated orthodontically with clear aligners. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and regression analyses to assess the relationships between Angle's classifications, spacing or crowding measurements, and the need for treatment refinement. Results: Participants comprised a total of 115 individuals, including a female majority (87.0%; n=100). The data presents the distribution of cases according to the Angle classification among the participants. Class I cases comprise the majority at 57.4% (n=66), followed by Class II at 27.8% (n=32), and Class III at 14.8% (n=17). The coefficient is 0.64, suggesting that individuals in Class III have a mean spacing or crowding at the end of treatment that is significantly greater than those in Class I, with a statistically significant p-value (<0.01; 95% CI: 0.29, 0.99). Conclusions: This study indicates that clear aligners might be more effective for treating Class I malocclusion, while Class II and III cases require more adjustments. Further research is necessary to understand the long-term effects of clear aligners and to optimize treatment strategies for different types of malocclusions. https://rjor.ro/how-clear-aligner-performed-in-treating-class-i-ii-iii-maloclusion-a-retrospective-study/ |
| spellingShingle | Mohammed Barashi HOW CLEAR ALIGNER PERFORMED IN TREATING CLASS I, II, III MALOCLUSION? A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY Romanian Journal of Oral Rehabilitation |
| title | HOW CLEAR ALIGNER PERFORMED IN TREATING CLASS I, II, III MALOCLUSION? A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY |
| title_full | HOW CLEAR ALIGNER PERFORMED IN TREATING CLASS I, II, III MALOCLUSION? A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY |
| title_fullStr | HOW CLEAR ALIGNER PERFORMED IN TREATING CLASS I, II, III MALOCLUSION? A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY |
| title_full_unstemmed | HOW CLEAR ALIGNER PERFORMED IN TREATING CLASS I, II, III MALOCLUSION? A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY |
| title_short | HOW CLEAR ALIGNER PERFORMED IN TREATING CLASS I, II, III MALOCLUSION? A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY |
| title_sort | how clear aligner performed in treating class i ii iii maloclusion a retrospective study |
| url | https://rjor.ro/how-clear-aligner-performed-in-treating-class-i-ii-iii-maloclusion-a-retrospective-study/ |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mohammedbarashi howclearalignerperformedintreatingclassiiiiiimaloclusionaretrospectivestudy |