Neurovascular bundle sparing in hypofractionated radiotherapy maintained with realistic treatment uncertainties

Background and purpose: Erectile dysfunction is a common side effect of radiotherapy for prostate cancer. To mitigate this toxicity, it has been suggested to limit the dose to critical nerves and vessels. We investigated the feasibility of sparing the neuro-vascular bundles (NVBs) in stereotactic bo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Roel C. Kwakernaak, Victor J. Brand, Jesús Rojo-Santiago, Femke E. Froklage, Mischa S. Hoogeman, Steven J.M. Habraken, Maaike T.W. Milder
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-01-01
Series:Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631625000193
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832542445869465600
author Roel C. Kwakernaak
Victor J. Brand
Jesús Rojo-Santiago
Femke E. Froklage
Mischa S. Hoogeman
Steven J.M. Habraken
Maaike T.W. Milder
author_facet Roel C. Kwakernaak
Victor J. Brand
Jesús Rojo-Santiago
Femke E. Froklage
Mischa S. Hoogeman
Steven J.M. Habraken
Maaike T.W. Milder
author_sort Roel C. Kwakernaak
collection DOAJ
description Background and purpose: Erectile dysfunction is a common side effect of radiotherapy for prostate cancer. To mitigate this toxicity, it has been suggested to limit the dose to critical nerves and vessels. We investigated the feasibility of sparing the neuro-vascular bundles (NVBs) in stereotactic body radiotherapy under the impact of realistic treatment uncertainties. Materials and methods: Non-sparing and sparing NVB treatment plans, delivered in 5 × 7.25 Gy, were automatically generated for 20 patients. Polynomial Chaos Expansion (PCE) was used to fast and accurately model the dose against treatment errors. PCE enabled a robustness evaluation of 100.000 treatment scenarios per plan, allowing to derive scenario distributions of clinically relevant dose volume histogram parameters and population dose histograms. Results: An average decrease of 3.7 Gy and 4.4 Gy in the median D0.1cm3 of the NVB was achieved in the patient population in the presence of realistic treatment uncertainties for non-coplanar (NC) and coplanar (C) plans respectively. Sparing NVBs decreased planning target volume coverage by 2.1 % in V36.25Gy on average, however clinical target volume (CTV) dose remained adequate. Population dose histograms showed that, while sparing does impact dose volume histogram parameters of organs at risk (OARs), the probability of a scenario exceeding planning constraints was limited. Conclusion: NVB sparing was maintained in the presence of treatment uncertainties without compromising CTV coverage or OAR dose. There was no significant difference in the achieved NVB dose between NC and C plans. The clinical impact of the achieved sparing is subject of ongoing clinical trials.
format Article
id doaj-art-605f63068ddb4755b1d30ced24eea8db
institution Kabale University
issn 2405-6316
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
spelling doaj-art-605f63068ddb4755b1d30ced24eea8db2025-02-04T04:10:29ZengElsevierPhysics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology2405-63162025-01-0133100714Neurovascular bundle sparing in hypofractionated radiotherapy maintained with realistic treatment uncertaintiesRoel C. Kwakernaak0Victor J. Brand1Jesús Rojo-Santiago2Femke E. Froklage3Mischa S. Hoogeman4Steven J.M. Habraken5Maaike T.W. Milder6Erasmus MC Cancer Institute University Medical Center Rotterdam Department of Radiotherapy the NetherlandsErasmus MC Cancer Institute University Medical Center Rotterdam Department of Radiotherapy the NetherlandsErasmus MC Cancer Institute University Medical Center Rotterdam Department of Radiotherapy the NetherlandsErasmus MC Cancer Institute University Medical Center Rotterdam Department of Radiotherapy the NetherlandsErasmus MC Cancer Institute University Medical Center Rotterdam Department of Radiotherapy the NetherlandsErasmus MC Cancer Institute University Medical Center Rotterdam Department of Radiotherapy the NetherlandsCorresponding author.; Erasmus MC Cancer Institute University Medical Center Rotterdam Department of Radiotherapy the NetherlandsBackground and purpose: Erectile dysfunction is a common side effect of radiotherapy for prostate cancer. To mitigate this toxicity, it has been suggested to limit the dose to critical nerves and vessels. We investigated the feasibility of sparing the neuro-vascular bundles (NVBs) in stereotactic body radiotherapy under the impact of realistic treatment uncertainties. Materials and methods: Non-sparing and sparing NVB treatment plans, delivered in 5 × 7.25 Gy, were automatically generated for 20 patients. Polynomial Chaos Expansion (PCE) was used to fast and accurately model the dose against treatment errors. PCE enabled a robustness evaluation of 100.000 treatment scenarios per plan, allowing to derive scenario distributions of clinically relevant dose volume histogram parameters and population dose histograms. Results: An average decrease of 3.7 Gy and 4.4 Gy in the median D0.1cm3 of the NVB was achieved in the patient population in the presence of realistic treatment uncertainties for non-coplanar (NC) and coplanar (C) plans respectively. Sparing NVBs decreased planning target volume coverage by 2.1 % in V36.25Gy on average, however clinical target volume (CTV) dose remained adequate. Population dose histograms showed that, while sparing does impact dose volume histogram parameters of organs at risk (OARs), the probability of a scenario exceeding planning constraints was limited. Conclusion: NVB sparing was maintained in the presence of treatment uncertainties without compromising CTV coverage or OAR dose. There was no significant difference in the achieved NVB dose between NC and C plans. The clinical impact of the achieved sparing is subject of ongoing clinical trials.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631625000193
spellingShingle Roel C. Kwakernaak
Victor J. Brand
Jesús Rojo-Santiago
Femke E. Froklage
Mischa S. Hoogeman
Steven J.M. Habraken
Maaike T.W. Milder
Neurovascular bundle sparing in hypofractionated radiotherapy maintained with realistic treatment uncertainties
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
title Neurovascular bundle sparing in hypofractionated radiotherapy maintained with realistic treatment uncertainties
title_full Neurovascular bundle sparing in hypofractionated radiotherapy maintained with realistic treatment uncertainties
title_fullStr Neurovascular bundle sparing in hypofractionated radiotherapy maintained with realistic treatment uncertainties
title_full_unstemmed Neurovascular bundle sparing in hypofractionated radiotherapy maintained with realistic treatment uncertainties
title_short Neurovascular bundle sparing in hypofractionated radiotherapy maintained with realistic treatment uncertainties
title_sort neurovascular bundle sparing in hypofractionated radiotherapy maintained with realistic treatment uncertainties
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631625000193
work_keys_str_mv AT roelckwakernaak neurovascularbundlesparinginhypofractionatedradiotherapymaintainedwithrealistictreatmentuncertainties
AT victorjbrand neurovascularbundlesparinginhypofractionatedradiotherapymaintainedwithrealistictreatmentuncertainties
AT jesusrojosantiago neurovascularbundlesparinginhypofractionatedradiotherapymaintainedwithrealistictreatmentuncertainties
AT femkeefroklage neurovascularbundlesparinginhypofractionatedradiotherapymaintainedwithrealistictreatmentuncertainties
AT mischashoogeman neurovascularbundlesparinginhypofractionatedradiotherapymaintainedwithrealistictreatmentuncertainties
AT stevenjmhabraken neurovascularbundlesparinginhypofractionatedradiotherapymaintainedwithrealistictreatmentuncertainties
AT maaiketwmilder neurovascularbundlesparinginhypofractionatedradiotherapymaintainedwithrealistictreatmentuncertainties