Response of Two Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Varieties to Rates of Blended Fertilizer and Row Spacing at Tselemti District, Northern Ethiopia

Effects of row spacing, blended fertilizer rates, and varieties on some agronomic traits of chickpea were evaluated with the objective of investigating response of Kabuli and Desi type chick pea varieties to blended fertilizers rates and interrow spacing. The study was done using split plot design i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tesfahun Mekuanint, Yemane Tsehaye, Yemane G. Egziabher
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2018-01-01
Series:Advances in Agriculture
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5085163
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832561284561764352
author Tesfahun Mekuanint
Yemane Tsehaye
Yemane G. Egziabher
author_facet Tesfahun Mekuanint
Yemane Tsehaye
Yemane G. Egziabher
author_sort Tesfahun Mekuanint
collection DOAJ
description Effects of row spacing, blended fertilizer rates, and varieties on some agronomic traits of chickpea were evaluated with the objective of investigating response of Kabuli and Desi type chick pea varieties to blended fertilizers rates and interrow spacing. The study was done using split plot design interrow spacing as a main plot, and fertilizer and variety as a subplot, where three row spacings (20 cm, 30 cm, and 40 cm) were assigned to the main plot while the factorial combination of four blended (NPSB) fertilizer rates (0 kg/ha, 50 kg/ha, 100 kg/ha, and 150 kg/ha) and representative of Kabuli and Desi type chickpea varieties such as Arerti and Mariye, respectively, were assigned to the subplot. Main effect of interrow spacing did not show significant difference on many studied agronomic parameters. Similarly, main effect of blended fertilizer rates and varieties did not reveal a significant difference for the studied parameters. However, significant differences were obtained on phenology, yield components, and yield for the varieties. Blended fertilizer rates utilized in Tselemti District did not show differences in most of studied traits. Reasonable row spacing of 20 cm for both types of chickpea could be used for the studied area.
format Article
id doaj-art-6050e3e61753485c8b7f24ee731a4343
institution Kabale University
issn 2356-654X
2314-7539
language English
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Advances in Agriculture
spelling doaj-art-6050e3e61753485c8b7f24ee731a43432025-02-03T01:25:22ZengWileyAdvances in Agriculture2356-654X2314-75392018-01-01201810.1155/2018/50851635085163Response of Two Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Varieties to Rates of Blended Fertilizer and Row Spacing at Tselemti District, Northern EthiopiaTesfahun Mekuanint0Yemane Tsehaye1Yemane G. Egziabher2Shire-Maytsebri Agricultural Research Center, Shire-Endasilase, Tigray, EthiopiaMekelle University, Department of Dry Land Crop and Horticultural Sciences, Mekelle, Tigray, EthiopiaMekelle University, Department of Dry Land Crop and Horticultural Sciences, Mekelle, Tigray, EthiopiaEffects of row spacing, blended fertilizer rates, and varieties on some agronomic traits of chickpea were evaluated with the objective of investigating response of Kabuli and Desi type chick pea varieties to blended fertilizers rates and interrow spacing. The study was done using split plot design interrow spacing as a main plot, and fertilizer and variety as a subplot, where three row spacings (20 cm, 30 cm, and 40 cm) were assigned to the main plot while the factorial combination of four blended (NPSB) fertilizer rates (0 kg/ha, 50 kg/ha, 100 kg/ha, and 150 kg/ha) and representative of Kabuli and Desi type chickpea varieties such as Arerti and Mariye, respectively, were assigned to the subplot. Main effect of interrow spacing did not show significant difference on many studied agronomic parameters. Similarly, main effect of blended fertilizer rates and varieties did not reveal a significant difference for the studied parameters. However, significant differences were obtained on phenology, yield components, and yield for the varieties. Blended fertilizer rates utilized in Tselemti District did not show differences in most of studied traits. Reasonable row spacing of 20 cm for both types of chickpea could be used for the studied area.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5085163
spellingShingle Tesfahun Mekuanint
Yemane Tsehaye
Yemane G. Egziabher
Response of Two Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Varieties to Rates of Blended Fertilizer and Row Spacing at Tselemti District, Northern Ethiopia
Advances in Agriculture
title Response of Two Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Varieties to Rates of Blended Fertilizer and Row Spacing at Tselemti District, Northern Ethiopia
title_full Response of Two Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Varieties to Rates of Blended Fertilizer and Row Spacing at Tselemti District, Northern Ethiopia
title_fullStr Response of Two Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Varieties to Rates of Blended Fertilizer and Row Spacing at Tselemti District, Northern Ethiopia
title_full_unstemmed Response of Two Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Varieties to Rates of Blended Fertilizer and Row Spacing at Tselemti District, Northern Ethiopia
title_short Response of Two Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Varieties to Rates of Blended Fertilizer and Row Spacing at Tselemti District, Northern Ethiopia
title_sort response of two chickpea cicer arietinum l varieties to rates of blended fertilizer and row spacing at tselemti district northern ethiopia
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5085163
work_keys_str_mv AT tesfahunmekuanint responseoftwochickpeacicerarietinumlvarietiestoratesofblendedfertilizerandrowspacingattselemtidistrictnorthernethiopia
AT yemanetsehaye responseoftwochickpeacicerarietinumlvarietiestoratesofblendedfertilizerandrowspacingattselemtidistrictnorthernethiopia
AT yemanegegziabher responseoftwochickpeacicerarietinumlvarietiestoratesofblendedfertilizerandrowspacingattselemtidistrictnorthernethiopia