EVALUATION OF KIDNEY DRAINAGE OF THE IN ACUTE OBSTRUCTIVE PYELONEPHRITIS

Introduction. Currently, there are no generally recognized indications for the choice of methods of drainage of the upper urinary tract in obstructive uropathy. Both external and internal drainage involve a number of shortcomings affecting the quality of life of the patient.Purpose of research. To e...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S. V. Shkodkin, Y. B. Idashkin, V. V. Fentisov, A. V. Lubushkin, A. A. Nevskyi
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, Rostov State Medical University, State Budget Educational Institute of Higher Professional Education 2018-03-01
Series:Вестник урологии
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/189
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849250313471524864
author S. V. Shkodkin
Y. B. Idashkin
V. V. Fentisov
A. V. Lubushkin
A. A. Nevskyi
author_facet S. V. Shkodkin
Y. B. Idashkin
V. V. Fentisov
A. V. Lubushkin
A. A. Nevskyi
author_sort S. V. Shkodkin
collection DOAJ
description Introduction. Currently, there are no generally recognized indications for the choice of methods of drainage of the upper urinary tract in obstructive uropathy. Both external and internal drainage involve a number of shortcomings affecting the quality of life of the patient.Purpose of research. To evaluate the effectiveness of internal stenting (IC) and puncture nephrostomy (PN) as a method of temporary drainage of the upper urinary tract in acute obstructive pyelonephritis.Materials and methods. During 2012-2017 we observed 156 patients of both sexes aged from 25 to 74 years with the clinic of acute obstructive pyelonephritis against the background of urolithiasis. To restore the passage of urine is made stenting jj-stent or puncture nephrostomy. Materials and methods. During 2012-2017, we observed 156 patients of both sexes aged 25 to 74 years with a clinical picture of acute obstructive pyelonephritis on the background of urolithiasis. To restore the passage of urine is made stenting jj-stent or puncture nephrostomy.Results. Clinically, fever in the PN group was stopped for 1.8±0.5 days, and in the IC group this indicator was 5.5±2.8. In the IC group, 18 (58.1%) patients complained of irritative symptoms of varying severity, and in 9 (29.0%) patients pain syndrome in the lower back associated with myction was noted. No similar complications were observed in the PN group. The inability to install and inadequate function of the IC group in 45.5% of cases required conversion in the PN group. The need for revision of the kidney after the PN group was noted in 0.8% of cases (p<0.01).Conclusion. Subject to adequate techniques of puncture of the kidney and the combined (ultrasonic and radiographic) control the conduct of puncture nephrostomy is a safe method of drainage of the kidney in acute obstructive pyelonephritis, ensuring laying of drainage is of adequate diameter that allows you to get the best results for the relief of pyelonephritis in comparison with the inner stent.
format Article
id doaj-art-602ad92b542a47a09eae86165e79d2c5
institution Kabale University
issn 2308-6424
language Russian
publishDate 2018-03-01
publisher Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, Rostov State Medical University, State Budget Educational Institute of Higher Professional Education
record_format Article
series Вестник урологии
spelling doaj-art-602ad92b542a47a09eae86165e79d2c52025-08-20T03:57:18ZrusMinistry of Health of Russian Federation, Rostov State Medical University, State Budget Educational Institute of Higher Professional EducationВестник урологии2308-64242018-03-0161273510.21886/2308-6424-2018-6-1-27-35147EVALUATION OF KIDNEY DRAINAGE OF THE IN ACUTE OBSTRUCTIVE PYELONEPHRITISS. V. Shkodkin0Y. B. Idashkin1V. V. Fentisov2A. V. Lubushkin3A. A. Nevskyi4Belgorod regional clinical hospital Svyatitelya Ioasafa; Belgorod National Research UniversityBelgorod regional clinical hospital Svyatitelya IoasafaBelgorod National Research UniversityBelgorod National Research UniversityBelgorod National Research UniversityIntroduction. Currently, there are no generally recognized indications for the choice of methods of drainage of the upper urinary tract in obstructive uropathy. Both external and internal drainage involve a number of shortcomings affecting the quality of life of the patient.Purpose of research. To evaluate the effectiveness of internal stenting (IC) and puncture nephrostomy (PN) as a method of temporary drainage of the upper urinary tract in acute obstructive pyelonephritis.Materials and methods. During 2012-2017 we observed 156 patients of both sexes aged from 25 to 74 years with the clinic of acute obstructive pyelonephritis against the background of urolithiasis. To restore the passage of urine is made stenting jj-stent or puncture nephrostomy. Materials and methods. During 2012-2017, we observed 156 patients of both sexes aged 25 to 74 years with a clinical picture of acute obstructive pyelonephritis on the background of urolithiasis. To restore the passage of urine is made stenting jj-stent or puncture nephrostomy.Results. Clinically, fever in the PN group was stopped for 1.8±0.5 days, and in the IC group this indicator was 5.5±2.8. In the IC group, 18 (58.1%) patients complained of irritative symptoms of varying severity, and in 9 (29.0%) patients pain syndrome in the lower back associated with myction was noted. No similar complications were observed in the PN group. The inability to install and inadequate function of the IC group in 45.5% of cases required conversion in the PN group. The need for revision of the kidney after the PN group was noted in 0.8% of cases (p<0.01).Conclusion. Subject to adequate techniques of puncture of the kidney and the combined (ultrasonic and radiographic) control the conduct of puncture nephrostomy is a safe method of drainage of the kidney in acute obstructive pyelonephritis, ensuring laying of drainage is of adequate diameter that allows you to get the best results for the relief of pyelonephritis in comparison with the inner stent.https://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/189pyelonephritisnephrostomystentdrainageupper urinary tract
spellingShingle S. V. Shkodkin
Y. B. Idashkin
V. V. Fentisov
A. V. Lubushkin
A. A. Nevskyi
EVALUATION OF KIDNEY DRAINAGE OF THE IN ACUTE OBSTRUCTIVE PYELONEPHRITIS
Вестник урологии
pyelonephritis
nephrostomy
stent
drainage
upper urinary tract
title EVALUATION OF KIDNEY DRAINAGE OF THE IN ACUTE OBSTRUCTIVE PYELONEPHRITIS
title_full EVALUATION OF KIDNEY DRAINAGE OF THE IN ACUTE OBSTRUCTIVE PYELONEPHRITIS
title_fullStr EVALUATION OF KIDNEY DRAINAGE OF THE IN ACUTE OBSTRUCTIVE PYELONEPHRITIS
title_full_unstemmed EVALUATION OF KIDNEY DRAINAGE OF THE IN ACUTE OBSTRUCTIVE PYELONEPHRITIS
title_short EVALUATION OF KIDNEY DRAINAGE OF THE IN ACUTE OBSTRUCTIVE PYELONEPHRITIS
title_sort evaluation of kidney drainage of the in acute obstructive pyelonephritis
topic pyelonephritis
nephrostomy
stent
drainage
upper urinary tract
url https://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/189
work_keys_str_mv AT svshkodkin evaluationofkidneydrainageoftheinacuteobstructivepyelonephritis
AT ybidashkin evaluationofkidneydrainageoftheinacuteobstructivepyelonephritis
AT vvfentisov evaluationofkidneydrainageoftheinacuteobstructivepyelonephritis
AT avlubushkin evaluationofkidneydrainageoftheinacuteobstructivepyelonephritis
AT aanevskyi evaluationofkidneydrainageoftheinacuteobstructivepyelonephritis