Visual outcomes with implantable Collamer lens versus small incision lenticule extraction in moderate-high myopia: A pilot study

Purpose: To compare the visual outcomes of implantable Collamer lens (ICL) with small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in cases of moderate-high myopia. Methods: A prospective comparative study was conducted on 60 eyes of 30 patients with moderate-high myopia (−3D to −8D with astigmatism ≤1 D)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rajesh Sinha, Juhi Daga, Pranita Sahay, Vinay Gupta, Tushar Agarwal, Namrata Sharma, Prafulla K Maharana, Sudarshan K Khokhar, Jeewan S Titiyal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2025-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/IJO.IJO_908_24
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841556793174523904
author Rajesh Sinha
Juhi Daga
Pranita Sahay
Vinay Gupta
Tushar Agarwal
Namrata Sharma
Prafulla K Maharana
Sudarshan K Khokhar
Jeewan S Titiyal
author_facet Rajesh Sinha
Juhi Daga
Pranita Sahay
Vinay Gupta
Tushar Agarwal
Namrata Sharma
Prafulla K Maharana
Sudarshan K Khokhar
Jeewan S Titiyal
author_sort Rajesh Sinha
collection DOAJ
description Purpose: To compare the visual outcomes of implantable Collamer lens (ICL) with small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in cases of moderate-high myopia. Methods: A prospective comparative study was conducted on 60 eyes of 30 patients with moderate-high myopia (−3D to −8D with astigmatism ≤1 D) at a tertiary eye care center. Patients underwent either SMILE or ICL in both eyes and had a postoperative follow-up of 1 year. Results: The manifest refractive spherical equivalent was −5.22 ± 1.05 D and −5.4 ± 1.17 D in the SMILE and ICL groups, respectively (P = 0.53). The mean sphere and cylinder were comparable between the groups. The mean uncorrected visual acuity improved from 1.18 ± 0.19 logMAR to 0.03 ± 0.07 logMAR in SMILE and 1.14 ± 0.25 logMAR to 0.011 ± 0.04 logMAR in the ICL group. The efficacy for SMILE was 83.3% and that for ICL was 93.3%. Safety and predictability (±0.5D) for both was 100%. A significant increase was observed in ocular aberration with a decrease in modular transfer function in the eyes that underwent SMILE, whereas no significant change in the eyes that underwent ICL. A significant difference was observed in all parameters of ocular aberration except corneal trefoil, corneal astigmatism, and PSF between the two groups at the final follow-up. The contrast sensitivity at final follow-up was higher in ICL cases when compared to SMILE. The quality of vision (QoV) score suggested a better QoV with ICL; however, the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Both SMILE and ICL are safe in patients with moderate-high myopia. The efficacy, contrast sensitivity, and postoperative ocular aberration profile are better in cases undergoing ICL.
format Article
id doaj-art-602489a3cdf94e3c8c5877d9aea35486
institution Kabale University
issn 0301-4738
1998-3689
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
spelling doaj-art-602489a3cdf94e3c8c5877d9aea354862025-01-07T06:27:42ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Ophthalmology0301-47381998-36892025-01-0173111512110.4103/IJO.IJO_908_24Visual outcomes with implantable Collamer lens versus small incision lenticule extraction in moderate-high myopia: A pilot studyRajesh SinhaJuhi DagaPranita SahayVinay GuptaTushar AgarwalNamrata SharmaPrafulla K MaharanaSudarshan K KhokharJeewan S TitiyalPurpose: To compare the visual outcomes of implantable Collamer lens (ICL) with small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in cases of moderate-high myopia. Methods: A prospective comparative study was conducted on 60 eyes of 30 patients with moderate-high myopia (−3D to −8D with astigmatism ≤1 D) at a tertiary eye care center. Patients underwent either SMILE or ICL in both eyes and had a postoperative follow-up of 1 year. Results: The manifest refractive spherical equivalent was −5.22 ± 1.05 D and −5.4 ± 1.17 D in the SMILE and ICL groups, respectively (P = 0.53). The mean sphere and cylinder were comparable between the groups. The mean uncorrected visual acuity improved from 1.18 ± 0.19 logMAR to 0.03 ± 0.07 logMAR in SMILE and 1.14 ± 0.25 logMAR to 0.011 ± 0.04 logMAR in the ICL group. The efficacy for SMILE was 83.3% and that for ICL was 93.3%. Safety and predictability (±0.5D) for both was 100%. A significant increase was observed in ocular aberration with a decrease in modular transfer function in the eyes that underwent SMILE, whereas no significant change in the eyes that underwent ICL. A significant difference was observed in all parameters of ocular aberration except corneal trefoil, corneal astigmatism, and PSF between the two groups at the final follow-up. The contrast sensitivity at final follow-up was higher in ICL cases when compared to SMILE. The quality of vision (QoV) score suggested a better QoV with ICL; however, the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Both SMILE and ICL are safe in patients with moderate-high myopia. The efficacy, contrast sensitivity, and postoperative ocular aberration profile are better in cases undergoing ICL.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/IJO.IJO_908_24higher order aberrationsiclimplantable collamer lensmoderate myopiarefractive surgerysmall incision lenticule extractionsmile
spellingShingle Rajesh Sinha
Juhi Daga
Pranita Sahay
Vinay Gupta
Tushar Agarwal
Namrata Sharma
Prafulla K Maharana
Sudarshan K Khokhar
Jeewan S Titiyal
Visual outcomes with implantable Collamer lens versus small incision lenticule extraction in moderate-high myopia: A pilot study
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
higher order aberrations
icl
implantable collamer lens
moderate myopia
refractive surgery
small incision lenticule extraction
smile
title Visual outcomes with implantable Collamer lens versus small incision lenticule extraction in moderate-high myopia: A pilot study
title_full Visual outcomes with implantable Collamer lens versus small incision lenticule extraction in moderate-high myopia: A pilot study
title_fullStr Visual outcomes with implantable Collamer lens versus small incision lenticule extraction in moderate-high myopia: A pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Visual outcomes with implantable Collamer lens versus small incision lenticule extraction in moderate-high myopia: A pilot study
title_short Visual outcomes with implantable Collamer lens versus small incision lenticule extraction in moderate-high myopia: A pilot study
title_sort visual outcomes with implantable collamer lens versus small incision lenticule extraction in moderate high myopia a pilot study
topic higher order aberrations
icl
implantable collamer lens
moderate myopia
refractive surgery
small incision lenticule extraction
smile
url https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/IJO.IJO_908_24
work_keys_str_mv AT rajeshsinha visualoutcomeswithimplantablecollamerlensversussmallincisionlenticuleextractioninmoderatehighmyopiaapilotstudy
AT juhidaga visualoutcomeswithimplantablecollamerlensversussmallincisionlenticuleextractioninmoderatehighmyopiaapilotstudy
AT pranitasahay visualoutcomeswithimplantablecollamerlensversussmallincisionlenticuleextractioninmoderatehighmyopiaapilotstudy
AT vinaygupta visualoutcomeswithimplantablecollamerlensversussmallincisionlenticuleextractioninmoderatehighmyopiaapilotstudy
AT tusharagarwal visualoutcomeswithimplantablecollamerlensversussmallincisionlenticuleextractioninmoderatehighmyopiaapilotstudy
AT namratasharma visualoutcomeswithimplantablecollamerlensversussmallincisionlenticuleextractioninmoderatehighmyopiaapilotstudy
AT prafullakmaharana visualoutcomeswithimplantablecollamerlensversussmallincisionlenticuleextractioninmoderatehighmyopiaapilotstudy
AT sudarshankkhokhar visualoutcomeswithimplantablecollamerlensversussmallincisionlenticuleextractioninmoderatehighmyopiaapilotstudy
AT jeewanstitiyal visualoutcomeswithimplantablecollamerlensversussmallincisionlenticuleextractioninmoderatehighmyopiaapilotstudy