“Rationality” enhancement through anodal tDCS over the right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex

Abstract Experimental findings challenge classical economic theories by demonstrating that people are not solely self-interested but also have social preferences, such as fairness and reciprocity, that often conflict with self-interest motives. An ongoing debate examines whether social preferences a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jonathan Slater, Michal Lavidor, Eliran Halali
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2025-07-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-12375-y
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849235007910969344
author Jonathan Slater
Michal Lavidor
Eliran Halali
author_facet Jonathan Slater
Michal Lavidor
Eliran Halali
author_sort Jonathan Slater
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Experimental findings challenge classical economic theories by demonstrating that people are not solely self-interested but also have social preferences, such as fairness and reciprocity, that often conflict with self-interest motives. An ongoing debate examines whether social preferences arise automatically (requiring deliberate actions to ensure economic self-interest) or require cognitive control (implying that self-interest is the default motive and must be inhibited). Two distinct cognitive-control brain regions, each with potentially unique inhibitory functions, have been implicated in managing this conflict: the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (rDLPFC) and the right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (rVLPFC). Despite extensive neuromodulation research on the rDLPFC, the role of the rVLPFC remains unexplored. To address this gap, we examined the effect of anodal transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) over the rVLPFC on responders’ behavior in the ultimatum game. Stimulated participants accepted unfair offers significantly more often than those in the control (sham) group. This effect was not influenced by whether offers were made intentionally by a human partner or randomly by a computer but was absent when participants played on behalf of another random individual. These findings establish the causal role of the rVLPFC in promoting “rational” self-interested behavior in social exchange situations. We discuss theoretical implications.
format Article
id doaj-art-60137ce7b69540da83a7162c3175fc84
institution Kabale University
issn 2045-2322
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj-art-60137ce7b69540da83a7162c3175fc842025-08-20T04:02:56ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222025-07-0115111310.1038/s41598-025-12375-y“Rationality” enhancement through anodal tDCS over the right ventrolateral prefrontal cortexJonathan Slater0Michal Lavidor1Eliran Halali2Psychology Department, Bar Ilan UniversityPsychology Department, Bar Ilan UniversityPsychology Department, Bar Ilan UniversityAbstract Experimental findings challenge classical economic theories by demonstrating that people are not solely self-interested but also have social preferences, such as fairness and reciprocity, that often conflict with self-interest motives. An ongoing debate examines whether social preferences arise automatically (requiring deliberate actions to ensure economic self-interest) or require cognitive control (implying that self-interest is the default motive and must be inhibited). Two distinct cognitive-control brain regions, each with potentially unique inhibitory functions, have been implicated in managing this conflict: the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (rDLPFC) and the right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (rVLPFC). Despite extensive neuromodulation research on the rDLPFC, the role of the rVLPFC remains unexplored. To address this gap, we examined the effect of anodal transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) over the rVLPFC on responders’ behavior in the ultimatum game. Stimulated participants accepted unfair offers significantly more often than those in the control (sham) group. This effect was not influenced by whether offers were made intentionally by a human partner or randomly by a computer but was absent when participants played on behalf of another random individual. These findings establish the causal role of the rVLPFC in promoting “rational” self-interested behavior in social exchange situations. We discuss theoretical implications.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-12375-yNeuroeconomicsDecision neuroscienceNeuromodulationSocial preferencesUltimatum game
spellingShingle Jonathan Slater
Michal Lavidor
Eliran Halali
“Rationality” enhancement through anodal tDCS over the right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex
Scientific Reports
Neuroeconomics
Decision neuroscience
Neuromodulation
Social preferences
Ultimatum game
title “Rationality” enhancement through anodal tDCS over the right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex
title_full “Rationality” enhancement through anodal tDCS over the right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex
title_fullStr “Rationality” enhancement through anodal tDCS over the right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex
title_full_unstemmed “Rationality” enhancement through anodal tDCS over the right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex
title_short “Rationality” enhancement through anodal tDCS over the right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex
title_sort rationality enhancement through anodal tdcs over the right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex
topic Neuroeconomics
Decision neuroscience
Neuromodulation
Social preferences
Ultimatum game
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-12375-y
work_keys_str_mv AT jonathanslater rationalityenhancementthroughanodaltdcsovertherightventrolateralprefrontalcortex
AT michallavidor rationalityenhancementthroughanodaltdcsovertherightventrolateralprefrontalcortex
AT eliranhalali rationalityenhancementthroughanodaltdcsovertherightventrolateralprefrontalcortex