Methodology for Wildland–Urban Interface Mapping in Anning City Using High-Resolution Remote Sensing

The wildland–urban interface (WUI) has been a global phenomenon, yet parameter threshold determination remains a persistent challenge in this field. In China, a significant research gap exists in the development of WUI mapping methodology. This study proposes a novel mapping approach that delineates...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Feng Jiang, Xinyu Hu, Xianlin Qin, Shuisheng Huang, Fangxin Meng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-05-01
Series:Land
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/6/1141
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849431923839991808
author Feng Jiang
Xinyu Hu
Xianlin Qin
Shuisheng Huang
Fangxin Meng
author_facet Feng Jiang
Xinyu Hu
Xianlin Qin
Shuisheng Huang
Fangxin Meng
author_sort Feng Jiang
collection DOAJ
description The wildland–urban interface (WUI) has been a global phenomenon, yet parameter threshold determination remains a persistent challenge in this field. In China, a significant research gap exists in the development of WUI mapping methodology. This study proposes a novel mapping approach that delineates the WUI by integrating both vegetation and building environment perspectives. GaoFen 1 Panchromatic Multi-spectral Sensor (GF1-PMS) imagery was leveraged as the data source. Building location was extracted using object-oriented and hierarchical classification techniques, and the pixel dichotomy method was employed to estimate fractional vegetation coverage (FVC). Building location and FVC were used as input for the WUI mapping. In this methodology, the threshold of FVC was determined by incorporating the remote sensing characteristics of the WUI types, whereas the buffer range of vegetation was refined through sensitivity analysis. The proposed method demonstrated high applicability in Anning City, achieving an overall accuracy of 88.56%. The total WUI area amounted to 49,578.05 ha, accounting for 38.08% of Anning City’s entire area. Spatially, the intermix WUI was predominantly distributed in the Taiping sub-district of Anning City, while the interface WUI was mainly concentrated in the Bajie sub-district of Anning City. MODIS fire spots from 2003 to 2022 were primarily clustered in the Qinglong sub-district, Wenquan sub-district, and Caopu sub-district of Anning City. Our findings indicated a spatial overlap between the WUI and fire-prone areas in Anning City. This study presents an effective methodology for threshold determination and WUI mapping, making up for the scarcity of mapping methodologies in China. Moreover, our approach offers valuable insights for a wise decision in fire risk.
format Article
id doaj-art-5ffac689eaa940c0b55ede046f8aabb9
institution Kabale University
issn 2073-445X
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Land
spelling doaj-art-5ffac689eaa940c0b55ede046f8aabb92025-08-20T03:27:29ZengMDPI AGLand2073-445X2025-05-01146114110.3390/land14061141Methodology for Wildland–Urban Interface Mapping in Anning City Using High-Resolution Remote SensingFeng Jiang0Xinyu Hu1Xianlin Qin2Shuisheng Huang3Fangxin Meng4Research Institute of Forest Resource Information Techniques, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, ChinaResearch Institute of Forest Resource Information Techniques, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, ChinaResearch Institute of Forest Resource Information Techniques, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, ChinaResearch Institute of Forest Resource Information Techniques, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, ChinaResearch Institute of Forest Resource Information Techniques, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, ChinaThe wildland–urban interface (WUI) has been a global phenomenon, yet parameter threshold determination remains a persistent challenge in this field. In China, a significant research gap exists in the development of WUI mapping methodology. This study proposes a novel mapping approach that delineates the WUI by integrating both vegetation and building environment perspectives. GaoFen 1 Panchromatic Multi-spectral Sensor (GF1-PMS) imagery was leveraged as the data source. Building location was extracted using object-oriented and hierarchical classification techniques, and the pixel dichotomy method was employed to estimate fractional vegetation coverage (FVC). Building location and FVC were used as input for the WUI mapping. In this methodology, the threshold of FVC was determined by incorporating the remote sensing characteristics of the WUI types, whereas the buffer range of vegetation was refined through sensitivity analysis. The proposed method demonstrated high applicability in Anning City, achieving an overall accuracy of 88.56%. The total WUI area amounted to 49,578.05 ha, accounting for 38.08% of Anning City’s entire area. Spatially, the intermix WUI was predominantly distributed in the Taiping sub-district of Anning City, while the interface WUI was mainly concentrated in the Bajie sub-district of Anning City. MODIS fire spots from 2003 to 2022 were primarily clustered in the Qinglong sub-district, Wenquan sub-district, and Caopu sub-district of Anning City. Our findings indicated a spatial overlap between the WUI and fire-prone areas in Anning City. This study presents an effective methodology for threshold determination and WUI mapping, making up for the scarcity of mapping methodologies in China. Moreover, our approach offers valuable insights for a wise decision in fire risk.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/6/1141GF1-PMSmapping methodologysensitivity analysisWUIwildfire risk
spellingShingle Feng Jiang
Xinyu Hu
Xianlin Qin
Shuisheng Huang
Fangxin Meng
Methodology for Wildland–Urban Interface Mapping in Anning City Using High-Resolution Remote Sensing
Land
GF1-PMS
mapping methodology
sensitivity analysis
WUI
wildfire risk
title Methodology for Wildland–Urban Interface Mapping in Anning City Using High-Resolution Remote Sensing
title_full Methodology for Wildland–Urban Interface Mapping in Anning City Using High-Resolution Remote Sensing
title_fullStr Methodology for Wildland–Urban Interface Mapping in Anning City Using High-Resolution Remote Sensing
title_full_unstemmed Methodology for Wildland–Urban Interface Mapping in Anning City Using High-Resolution Remote Sensing
title_short Methodology for Wildland–Urban Interface Mapping in Anning City Using High-Resolution Remote Sensing
title_sort methodology for wildland urban interface mapping in anning city using high resolution remote sensing
topic GF1-PMS
mapping methodology
sensitivity analysis
WUI
wildfire risk
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/6/1141
work_keys_str_mv AT fengjiang methodologyforwildlandurbaninterfacemappinginanningcityusinghighresolutionremotesensing
AT xinyuhu methodologyforwildlandurbaninterfacemappinginanningcityusinghighresolutionremotesensing
AT xianlinqin methodologyforwildlandurbaninterfacemappinginanningcityusinghighresolutionremotesensing
AT shuishenghuang methodologyforwildlandurbaninterfacemappinginanningcityusinghighresolutionremotesensing
AT fangxinmeng methodologyforwildlandurbaninterfacemappinginanningcityusinghighresolutionremotesensing