SMAP soil moisture drying more rapid than observed in situ following rainfall events

Abstract We examine soil drying rates by comparing surface soil moisture observations from the NASA Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) mission to those from networks of in situ probes upscaled to SMAP's sensing footprint. SMAP and upscaled in situ probes record different soil drying dynamics a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peter J. Shellito, Eric E. Small, Andreas Colliander, Rajat Bindlish, Michael H. Cosh, Aaron A. Berg, David D. Bosch, Todd G. Caldwell, David C. Goodrich, Heather McNairn, John H. Prueger, Patrick J. Starks, Rogier van derVelde, Jeffrey P. Walker
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2016-08-01
Series:Geophysical Research Letters
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069946
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract We examine soil drying rates by comparing surface soil moisture observations from the NASA Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) mission to those from networks of in situ probes upscaled to SMAP's sensing footprint. SMAP and upscaled in situ probes record different soil drying dynamics after rainfall. We modeled this process by fitting an exponential curve to 63 drydown events: the median SMAP drying timescale is 44% shorter and the magnitude of drying is 35% greater than in situ measurements. We also calculated drying rates between consecutive observations from 193 events. For 6 days after rainfall, soil moisture from SMAP dries at twice the rate of in situ measurements. Restricting in situ observations to times of SMAP observations does not change the drying timescale, magnitude, or rate. Therefore, observed differences are likely due to differences in sensing depths: SMAP measures shallower soil moisture than in situ probes, especially after rainfall.
ISSN:0094-8276
1944-8007