Acceptability, feasibility, and factors affecting implementation of a gender-sensitivity training for HIV providers and staff in Uganda: a mixed methods, quasi-experimental controlled pilot trial

Abstract Background Health workers play a critical role in providing gender-sensitive HIV care. However, without adequate training, they may inadvertently reinforce negative gender norms that hinder engagement in care. To improve ART services in sub-Saharan Africa, effective implementation strategie...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: K M. Sileo, R K. Wanyenze, A Anecho, R L. Luttinen, K Weston, B Mukasa, S C. Mukama, S H. Vermund, S L. Dworkin, J F. Dovidio, B S. Taylor, T S. Kershaw
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-05-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-23008-4
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850125756446801920
author K M. Sileo
R K. Wanyenze
A Anecho
R L. Luttinen
K Weston
B Mukasa
S C. Mukama
S H. Vermund
S L. Dworkin
J F. Dovidio
B S. Taylor
T S. Kershaw
author_facet K M. Sileo
R K. Wanyenze
A Anecho
R L. Luttinen
K Weston
B Mukasa
S C. Mukama
S H. Vermund
S L. Dworkin
J F. Dovidio
B S. Taylor
T S. Kershaw
author_sort K M. Sileo
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Health workers play a critical role in providing gender-sensitive HIV care. However, without adequate training, they may inadvertently reinforce negative gender norms that hinder engagement in care. To improve ART services in sub-Saharan Africa, effective implementation strategies, including trainings, are essential. Methods This study evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of a novel 4-session, gender-sensitivity training for HIV health and lay workers in rural and peri-urban Uganda. We conducted a pilot quasi-experimental controlled trial in 2022–23, utilizing data from three sources: process data from 144 providers and 238 clients, qualitative post-intervention focus groups and interviews with 53 training attendees, and stakeholder interviews with 12 community leaders and facilitators. We employed thematic analysis guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Results The training was highly rated by attendees via brief post-session surveys, with 99% of sessions deemed satisfactory. Qualitative feedback indicated that the sessions were perceived as appropriate for addressing providers’ gaps in delivering gender-sensitive care and as beneficial for participants. High feasibility was evidenced by 100% of intervention steps delivered (fidelity checklists), 86% attendance (attendance logs), and 98.6% and 94.8% recruitment of eligible providers and clients (study records), respectively. Through qualitative exit focus groups, factors that positively affected acceptability and feasibility included tactics to gain support from supervisors, the use of experienced facilitators and active learning approaches, and the consideration of the health system context in delivery (e.g., cadre mix, location). Suggested improvements encompassed addressing interpersonal and structural barriers to client-centered care, incorporating community sensitization, streamlining content, and enhancing mentorship follow-ups. Stakeholders recognized the training’s alignment with national health priorities and emphasized the need for clarity regarding its integration with existing training curricula and ongoing stakeholder engagement. Conclusions This study underscores the acceptability and feasibility of a gender-sensitivity training program for HIV providers; further evaluation of the program is warranted. Identified factors influencing implementation can inform enhancements to gender-focused training initiatives to improve the quality of HIV services and enhance client engagement and health outcomes. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT05178979, registered: November 15, 2021.
format Article
id doaj-art-5fae97aba1114e28aab5733c3137e97a
institution OA Journals
issn 1471-2458
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Public Health
spelling doaj-art-5fae97aba1114e28aab5733c3137e97a2025-08-20T02:34:04ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582025-05-0125112010.1186/s12889-025-23008-4Acceptability, feasibility, and factors affecting implementation of a gender-sensitivity training for HIV providers and staff in Uganda: a mixed methods, quasi-experimental controlled pilot trialK M. Sileo0R K. Wanyenze1A Anecho2R L. Luttinen3K Weston4B Mukasa5S C. Mukama6S H. Vermund7S L. Dworkin8J F. Dovidio9B S. Taylor10T S. Kershaw11The Department of Discovery and Implementation for the Common Good, Connell School of Nursing, Boston CollegeDepartment of Disease Control and Environmental Health, Makerere University School of Public HealthDepartment of Disease Control and Environmental Health, Makerere University School of Public HealthDepartment of Sociology and Demography, The University of Texas at San AntonioDepartment of Public Health, The University of Texas at San AntonioMildmay UgandaMildmay UgandaDepartment of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public HealthSchool of Nursing and Health Studies, University of WashingtonDepartment of Psychology, Yale UniversityDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Joe R. & Teresa Lozano Long School of Medicine, UT Health San AntonioDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Yale School of Public HealthAbstract Background Health workers play a critical role in providing gender-sensitive HIV care. However, without adequate training, they may inadvertently reinforce negative gender norms that hinder engagement in care. To improve ART services in sub-Saharan Africa, effective implementation strategies, including trainings, are essential. Methods This study evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of a novel 4-session, gender-sensitivity training for HIV health and lay workers in rural and peri-urban Uganda. We conducted a pilot quasi-experimental controlled trial in 2022–23, utilizing data from three sources: process data from 144 providers and 238 clients, qualitative post-intervention focus groups and interviews with 53 training attendees, and stakeholder interviews with 12 community leaders and facilitators. We employed thematic analysis guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Results The training was highly rated by attendees via brief post-session surveys, with 99% of sessions deemed satisfactory. Qualitative feedback indicated that the sessions were perceived as appropriate for addressing providers’ gaps in delivering gender-sensitive care and as beneficial for participants. High feasibility was evidenced by 100% of intervention steps delivered (fidelity checklists), 86% attendance (attendance logs), and 98.6% and 94.8% recruitment of eligible providers and clients (study records), respectively. Through qualitative exit focus groups, factors that positively affected acceptability and feasibility included tactics to gain support from supervisors, the use of experienced facilitators and active learning approaches, and the consideration of the health system context in delivery (e.g., cadre mix, location). Suggested improvements encompassed addressing interpersonal and structural barriers to client-centered care, incorporating community sensitization, streamlining content, and enhancing mentorship follow-ups. Stakeholders recognized the training’s alignment with national health priorities and emphasized the need for clarity regarding its integration with existing training curricula and ongoing stakeholder engagement. Conclusions This study underscores the acceptability and feasibility of a gender-sensitivity training program for HIV providers; further evaluation of the program is warranted. Identified factors influencing implementation can inform enhancements to gender-focused training initiatives to improve the quality of HIV services and enhance client engagement and health outcomes. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT05178979, registered: November 15, 2021.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-23008-4HIV/AIDSGenderInterventionTrialMixed MethodsImplementation Science
spellingShingle K M. Sileo
R K. Wanyenze
A Anecho
R L. Luttinen
K Weston
B Mukasa
S C. Mukama
S H. Vermund
S L. Dworkin
J F. Dovidio
B S. Taylor
T S. Kershaw
Acceptability, feasibility, and factors affecting implementation of a gender-sensitivity training for HIV providers and staff in Uganda: a mixed methods, quasi-experimental controlled pilot trial
BMC Public Health
HIV/AIDS
Gender
Intervention
Trial
Mixed Methods
Implementation Science
title Acceptability, feasibility, and factors affecting implementation of a gender-sensitivity training for HIV providers and staff in Uganda: a mixed methods, quasi-experimental controlled pilot trial
title_full Acceptability, feasibility, and factors affecting implementation of a gender-sensitivity training for HIV providers and staff in Uganda: a mixed methods, quasi-experimental controlled pilot trial
title_fullStr Acceptability, feasibility, and factors affecting implementation of a gender-sensitivity training for HIV providers and staff in Uganda: a mixed methods, quasi-experimental controlled pilot trial
title_full_unstemmed Acceptability, feasibility, and factors affecting implementation of a gender-sensitivity training for HIV providers and staff in Uganda: a mixed methods, quasi-experimental controlled pilot trial
title_short Acceptability, feasibility, and factors affecting implementation of a gender-sensitivity training for HIV providers and staff in Uganda: a mixed methods, quasi-experimental controlled pilot trial
title_sort acceptability feasibility and factors affecting implementation of a gender sensitivity training for hiv providers and staff in uganda a mixed methods quasi experimental controlled pilot trial
topic HIV/AIDS
Gender
Intervention
Trial
Mixed Methods
Implementation Science
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-23008-4
work_keys_str_mv AT kmsileo acceptabilityfeasibilityandfactorsaffectingimplementationofagendersensitivitytrainingforhivprovidersandstaffinugandaamixedmethodsquasiexperimentalcontrolledpilottrial
AT rkwanyenze acceptabilityfeasibilityandfactorsaffectingimplementationofagendersensitivitytrainingforhivprovidersandstaffinugandaamixedmethodsquasiexperimentalcontrolledpilottrial
AT aanecho acceptabilityfeasibilityandfactorsaffectingimplementationofagendersensitivitytrainingforhivprovidersandstaffinugandaamixedmethodsquasiexperimentalcontrolledpilottrial
AT rlluttinen acceptabilityfeasibilityandfactorsaffectingimplementationofagendersensitivitytrainingforhivprovidersandstaffinugandaamixedmethodsquasiexperimentalcontrolledpilottrial
AT kweston acceptabilityfeasibilityandfactorsaffectingimplementationofagendersensitivitytrainingforhivprovidersandstaffinugandaamixedmethodsquasiexperimentalcontrolledpilottrial
AT bmukasa acceptabilityfeasibilityandfactorsaffectingimplementationofagendersensitivitytrainingforhivprovidersandstaffinugandaamixedmethodsquasiexperimentalcontrolledpilottrial
AT scmukama acceptabilityfeasibilityandfactorsaffectingimplementationofagendersensitivitytrainingforhivprovidersandstaffinugandaamixedmethodsquasiexperimentalcontrolledpilottrial
AT shvermund acceptabilityfeasibilityandfactorsaffectingimplementationofagendersensitivitytrainingforhivprovidersandstaffinugandaamixedmethodsquasiexperimentalcontrolledpilottrial
AT sldworkin acceptabilityfeasibilityandfactorsaffectingimplementationofagendersensitivitytrainingforhivprovidersandstaffinugandaamixedmethodsquasiexperimentalcontrolledpilottrial
AT jfdovidio acceptabilityfeasibilityandfactorsaffectingimplementationofagendersensitivitytrainingforhivprovidersandstaffinugandaamixedmethodsquasiexperimentalcontrolledpilottrial
AT bstaylor acceptabilityfeasibilityandfactorsaffectingimplementationofagendersensitivitytrainingforhivprovidersandstaffinugandaamixedmethodsquasiexperimentalcontrolledpilottrial
AT tskershaw acceptabilityfeasibilityandfactorsaffectingimplementationofagendersensitivitytrainingforhivprovidersandstaffinugandaamixedmethodsquasiexperimentalcontrolledpilottrial