Semiempirical versus Theoretical Stellar Population Models: A Comparison with Star Clusters

Stellar population synthesis (SPS) models are a key tool for deriving the age, metallicity, radial velocity, and reddening of star clusters from their integrated spectra. Using a sample of 129 star clusters with high-quality spectra, we analyze the uncertainties associated with selecting an empirica...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Randa Asa’d, Paula R. T. Coelho, Johina M. John, Igor V. Chilingarian, Gustavo Bruzual, Stephane Charlot
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2025-01-01
Series:The Astronomical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/addaad
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850103960170397696
author Randa Asa’d
Paula R. T. Coelho
Johina M. John
Igor V. Chilingarian
Gustavo Bruzual
Stephane Charlot
author_facet Randa Asa’d
Paula R. T. Coelho
Johina M. John
Igor V. Chilingarian
Gustavo Bruzual
Stephane Charlot
author_sort Randa Asa’d
collection DOAJ
description Stellar population synthesis (SPS) models are a key tool for deriving the age, metallicity, radial velocity, and reddening of star clusters from their integrated spectra. Using a sample of 129 star clusters with high-quality spectra, we analyze the uncertainties associated with selecting an empirical versus a theoretical stellar spectral library in the SPS models. We find that the fits from the different models agree on the goodness-of-fit metrics and inferred reddening. However, the derived age and metallicity can be affected by the choice of the stellar library, with synthetic libraries tending to give lower age and metallicity, especially for spectra with low signal-to-noise ratio. Ages and reddening values from SSP-equivalent fits are consistent with the multipopulation fits; however, SSP-equivalent metallicities are affected by the coarse coverage of the SPS grid in [Fe/H]. When comparing the spectral fitting results with the literature, we find that (1) all models underestimate age for old and metal-poor systems, and (2) on average, SPS models based on synthetic stellar libraries better match the isochrone ages and metallicities from high-resolution stellar spectroscopy.
format Article
id doaj-art-5fa2d8425b9f453694cb58a4335a4ab6
institution DOAJ
issn 1538-3881
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format Article
series The Astronomical Journal
spelling doaj-art-5fa2d8425b9f453694cb58a4335a4ab62025-08-20T02:39:25ZengIOP PublishingThe Astronomical Journal1538-38812025-01-0117028510.3847/1538-3881/addaadSemiempirical versus Theoretical Stellar Population Models: A Comparison with Star ClustersRanda Asa’d0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4861-6624Paula R. T. Coelho1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1846-4826Johina M. John2Igor V. Chilingarian3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7924-3253Gustavo Bruzual4Stephane Charlot5American University of Sharjah , Physics Department, P.O. Box 26666, Sharjah, UAE ; raasad@aus.eduUniversidade de São Paulo , Instituto de Astronomia, Geofísica e Ciencias Atmosféricas, Rua do Matão 1226, 05508-090 São Paulo, BrazilAmerican University of Sharjah , Physics Department, P.O. Box 26666, Sharjah, UAE ; raasad@aus.eduCenter for Astrophysics—Harvard and Smithsonian , 60 Garden St. MS09, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA; Sternberg Astronomical Institute, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University , 13 Universitetsky prospect, Moscow, 119991, RussiaInstituto de Radioastronomía y Astrofísica , UNAM, Campus Morelia, Michoacán, C.P. 58089, MéxicoSorbonne Université , CNRS, UMR7095, Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris, F-75014 Paris, FranceStellar population synthesis (SPS) models are a key tool for deriving the age, metallicity, radial velocity, and reddening of star clusters from their integrated spectra. Using a sample of 129 star clusters with high-quality spectra, we analyze the uncertainties associated with selecting an empirical versus a theoretical stellar spectral library in the SPS models. We find that the fits from the different models agree on the goodness-of-fit metrics and inferred reddening. However, the derived age and metallicity can be affected by the choice of the stellar library, with synthetic libraries tending to give lower age and metallicity, especially for spectra with low signal-to-noise ratio. Ages and reddening values from SSP-equivalent fits are consistent with the multipopulation fits; however, SSP-equivalent metallicities are affected by the coarse coverage of the SPS grid in [Fe/H]. When comparing the spectral fitting results with the literature, we find that (1) all models underestimate age for old and metal-poor systems, and (2) on average, SPS models based on synthetic stellar libraries better match the isochrone ages and metallicities from high-resolution stellar spectroscopy.https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/addaadStar clusters
spellingShingle Randa Asa’d
Paula R. T. Coelho
Johina M. John
Igor V. Chilingarian
Gustavo Bruzual
Stephane Charlot
Semiempirical versus Theoretical Stellar Population Models: A Comparison with Star Clusters
The Astronomical Journal
Star clusters
title Semiempirical versus Theoretical Stellar Population Models: A Comparison with Star Clusters
title_full Semiempirical versus Theoretical Stellar Population Models: A Comparison with Star Clusters
title_fullStr Semiempirical versus Theoretical Stellar Population Models: A Comparison with Star Clusters
title_full_unstemmed Semiempirical versus Theoretical Stellar Population Models: A Comparison with Star Clusters
title_short Semiempirical versus Theoretical Stellar Population Models: A Comparison with Star Clusters
title_sort semiempirical versus theoretical stellar population models a comparison with star clusters
topic Star clusters
url https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/addaad
work_keys_str_mv AT randaasad semiempiricalversustheoreticalstellarpopulationmodelsacomparisonwithstarclusters
AT paulartcoelho semiempiricalversustheoreticalstellarpopulationmodelsacomparisonwithstarclusters
AT johinamjohn semiempiricalversustheoreticalstellarpopulationmodelsacomparisonwithstarclusters
AT igorvchilingarian semiempiricalversustheoreticalstellarpopulationmodelsacomparisonwithstarclusters
AT gustavobruzual semiempiricalversustheoreticalstellarpopulationmodelsacomparisonwithstarclusters
AT stephanecharlot semiempiricalversustheoreticalstellarpopulationmodelsacomparisonwithstarclusters