Sex differences in the association between repetitive negative thinking and neurofilament light

Abstract Emerging evidence suggests that repetitive negative thinking (RNT; i.e., worry and ruminative brooding) is associated with biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease. Given that women have a greater risk of many neurodegenerative diseases, this study investigated whether worry and brooding are assoc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yolanda Lau, Amit Bansal, Cassandre Palix, Harriet Demnitz-King, Miranka Wirth, Olga Klimecki, Gael Chetelat, Géraldine Poisnel, Natalie L. Marchant, The Medit-Ageing Research Group
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2024-11-01
Series:npj Mental Health Research
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s44184-024-00093-8
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Emerging evidence suggests that repetitive negative thinking (RNT; i.e., worry and ruminative brooding) is associated with biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease. Given that women have a greater risk of many neurodegenerative diseases, this study investigated whether worry and brooding are associated with general neurodegeneration and whether associations differ by sex. Exploratory analyses examined whether allostatic load, a marker of chronic stress, mediates any observed relationships. Baseline data from 134 cognitively healthy older adults in the Age-Well clinical trial were utilised. Worry and brooding were assessed using questionnaires. Plasma neurofilament light chain (NfL), a biomarker of neurodegeneration, was quantified using a Meso Scale Discovery assay. We found a positive interaction between brooding and sex on NfL, with higher brooding associated with greater NfL levels in women. No associations were observed between worry/ruminative brooding and allostatic load. These results offer preliminary support that RNT is associated with worse brain health, specifically in women.
ISSN:2731-4251