Load Forecasting Using BiLSTM with Quantile Granger Causality: Insights from Geographic–Climatic Coupling Mechanisms
In order to explore the correlation between meteorological factors and power load changes, as well as the role of these factors in load forecasting, a hybrid load forecasting modeling framework based on quantile Granger causality test and bidirectional long short-term memory (QGCT-BiLSTM) is propose...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-05-01
|
| Series: | Applied Sciences |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/15/11/5912 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | In order to explore the correlation between meteorological factors and power load changes, as well as the role of these factors in load forecasting, a hybrid load forecasting modeling framework based on quantile Granger causality test and bidirectional long short-term memory (QGCT-BiLSTM) is proposed. The Augmented Dickey–Fuller test (ADF) is used to test the smoothness of the influencing factor series and the load series, and the variables that passed the smoothness test are subjected to QGCT for identification of the characteristic variables with significant causal associations. Furthermore, the BiLSTM model is then constructed using the selected factors to generate load forecasts. Using real data from Fujian, China, we demonstrate that QGCT-based feature screening reduces forecasting errors by an average of 34.96%, where the RMSE, MAE and MAPE are 29.19%, 30.06% and 45.63%, respectively, thereby validating the necessity of causal factor selection. Additionally, single-factor perturbation analysis at seasonal scales quantifies load sensitivity to environmental changes, while geographic–climatic coupling mechanisms explain observed load variation patterns. The results confirm that QGCT-BiLSTM effectively isolates critical meteorological drivers and significantly enhances prediction accuracy compared to conventional approaches, achieving 20.3% lower RMSE and 16.8% lower MAE than LSTM. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2076-3417 |