Societal preferences for the treatment of impulsive-violent offenders: a discrete choice experiment
Objectives The aim of this study is to quantify societal preferences for, and assess trade-offs between characteristics of treatment programmes for impulsive-violent offenders.Setting The study was conducted in New South Wales, Australia’s largest state.Participants The study participants were incom...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021-06-01
|
| Series: | BMJ Open |
| Online Access: | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/6/e033935.full |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1846162972169207808 |
|---|---|
| author | Marian Shanahan Peter Schofield Tony Butler Georgina M Chambers Stella Settumba |
| author_facet | Marian Shanahan Peter Schofield Tony Butler Georgina M Chambers Stella Settumba |
| author_sort | Marian Shanahan |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Objectives The aim of this study is to quantify societal preferences for, and assess trade-offs between characteristics of treatment programmes for impulsive-violent offenders.Setting The study was conducted in New South Wales, Australia’s largest state.Participants The study participants were income tax payers, aged over 18 and who were able to provide informed consent.Methods A discrete choice experiment was used to assess the preferences for treatment programmes for impulsive violent offenders. The survey presented participants with six choice sets in which they chose between two unlabelled treatment scenarios and a ‘no treatment’ choice. A random parameters logistic (RPL) model and a latent class (LC) model were used to analyse the societal preferences for treatment and estimate willingness to pay values based on marginal rates of substitution. Respondents were asked to self-identify if they ever had experiences with violence and subgroup analysis was done.Results The survey was completed by 1021 highly engaged participants. The RPL model showed that society had a preference for more effective programmes, programmes that provided full as opposed to partial treatment of all co-occurring health conditions, compulsory over voluntary programmes, those with flexibility in appointments and programmes that are provided with continuity of care postprison. Respondents were willing to pay an additional annual tax contribution for all significant attributes, particularly compulsory programmes, continuity of treatment and effectiveness.The LC model identified two classes of respondents with some differences in preferences which could be largely identified by whether they had experiences with violence or not.Conclusion The results are important for future programme design and implementation. Programmes for impulsive violent offenders that are designed to encompass societal preferences are likely to be supported by public and tax payers. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-5f3b7b4fe6fb47038ae1c81c691c6da5 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2044-6055 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2021-06-01 |
| publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMJ Open |
| spelling | doaj-art-5f3b7b4fe6fb47038ae1c81c691c6da52024-11-19T19:50:24ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552021-06-0111610.1136/bmjopen-2019-033935Societal preferences for the treatment of impulsive-violent offenders: a discrete choice experimentMarian Shanahan0Peter Schofield1Tony Butler2Georgina M Chambers3Stella Settumba4National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, AustraliaSchool of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, King’s College London, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine (FOLSM), London, UK2 School of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, AustraliaNational Perinatal Epidemiology and Statistics Unit, School of Women’s and Children’s Health, Centre for Big Data Research in Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, AustraliaNational Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, AustraliaObjectives The aim of this study is to quantify societal preferences for, and assess trade-offs between characteristics of treatment programmes for impulsive-violent offenders.Setting The study was conducted in New South Wales, Australia’s largest state.Participants The study participants were income tax payers, aged over 18 and who were able to provide informed consent.Methods A discrete choice experiment was used to assess the preferences for treatment programmes for impulsive violent offenders. The survey presented participants with six choice sets in which they chose between two unlabelled treatment scenarios and a ‘no treatment’ choice. A random parameters logistic (RPL) model and a latent class (LC) model were used to analyse the societal preferences for treatment and estimate willingness to pay values based on marginal rates of substitution. Respondents were asked to self-identify if they ever had experiences with violence and subgroup analysis was done.Results The survey was completed by 1021 highly engaged participants. The RPL model showed that society had a preference for more effective programmes, programmes that provided full as opposed to partial treatment of all co-occurring health conditions, compulsory over voluntary programmes, those with flexibility in appointments and programmes that are provided with continuity of care postprison. Respondents were willing to pay an additional annual tax contribution for all significant attributes, particularly compulsory programmes, continuity of treatment and effectiveness.The LC model identified two classes of respondents with some differences in preferences which could be largely identified by whether they had experiences with violence or not.Conclusion The results are important for future programme design and implementation. Programmes for impulsive violent offenders that are designed to encompass societal preferences are likely to be supported by public and tax payers.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/6/e033935.full |
| spellingShingle | Marian Shanahan Peter Schofield Tony Butler Georgina M Chambers Stella Settumba Societal preferences for the treatment of impulsive-violent offenders: a discrete choice experiment BMJ Open |
| title | Societal preferences for the treatment of impulsive-violent offenders: a discrete choice experiment |
| title_full | Societal preferences for the treatment of impulsive-violent offenders: a discrete choice experiment |
| title_fullStr | Societal preferences for the treatment of impulsive-violent offenders: a discrete choice experiment |
| title_full_unstemmed | Societal preferences for the treatment of impulsive-violent offenders: a discrete choice experiment |
| title_short | Societal preferences for the treatment of impulsive-violent offenders: a discrete choice experiment |
| title_sort | societal preferences for the treatment of impulsive violent offenders a discrete choice experiment |
| url | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/6/e033935.full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT marianshanahan societalpreferencesforthetreatmentofimpulsiveviolentoffendersadiscretechoiceexperiment AT peterschofield societalpreferencesforthetreatmentofimpulsiveviolentoffendersadiscretechoiceexperiment AT tonybutler societalpreferencesforthetreatmentofimpulsiveviolentoffendersadiscretechoiceexperiment AT georginamchambers societalpreferencesforthetreatmentofimpulsiveviolentoffendersadiscretechoiceexperiment AT stellasettumba societalpreferencesforthetreatmentofimpulsiveviolentoffendersadiscretechoiceexperiment |